Diversidad taxonómica y funcional de aves: Diferencias entre hábitats antrópicos en un bosque subtropical

Autores/as

  • Anahí S. Vaccaro Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, IEGEBA (CONICET-UBA), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • M. Isabel Bellocq Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, IEGEBA (CONICET-UBA), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.19.29.3.0.873

Resumen

Una de las amenazas principales para la biodiversidad es el avance de las actividades humanas que implican usos extensivos de la tierra. En este estudio buscamos identificar los usos de la tierra que mejor preservan el ensamble de especies de aves y sus rasgos funcionales en un bosque subtropical. Para ello comparamos simultáneamente la diversidad taxonómica (riqueza específica y similitud en la composición de especies) y la funcional (diversidad de rasgos funcionales y similitud en la composición de rasgos) de aves entre el bosque nativo y los hábitats antrópicos que resultan de actividades como las forestaciones, la urbanización, la ganadería y la agricultura, en uno de los bosques subtropicales más diversos y amenazados del mundo: el Bosque Atlántico del Alto Paraná. Relevamos aves y variables ambientales en los cinco tipos de hábitat, y seleccionamos 11 rasgos para estimar la diversidad funcional. Estimamos el “1-índice de disimilitud de Gower” para explorar las similitudes entre el bosque nativo y los hábitats antrópicos. Pusimos a prueba modelos de cuadrados mínimos generalizados para comparar la similitud ambiental y las diversidades taxonómica y funcional entre los tipos de hábitat. Estudiamos la asociación de los rasgos funcionales en cada tipo de hábitat mediante un fourth corner analysis. Como esperábamos, las forestaciones fueron el hábitat que mejor preservó el ensamble de aves y de rasgos funcionales del bosque nativo, y los usos de la tierra que resultan en hábitats abiertos fueron los más diferentes al bosque nativo en diversidad taxonómica y funcional. La similitud ambiental entre los hábitats antrópicos y el hábitat nativo es clave para conservar las aves y sus rasgos funcionales. Estudiar la diversidad taxonómica y funcional en estos hábitats es esencial para predecir las respuestas de las comunidades a los usos de la tierra y permite tomar decisiones de manejo adecuadas.

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.19.29.3.0.873

Citas

Askins, R. A., F. Chávez-Ramírez, B. C. Dale, C. A. Haas, J. R. Herkert, F. L. Knopf, and P. D. Vickery. 2007. Conservation of grassland birds in North America: Understanding ecological processes in different Regions. Ornithological Monographs 64:1-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/40166905.

Azpiroz, A. B., J. P. Isacch, R. A. Dias, A. S. Di Giacomo, C. S. Fontana, and C. M. Palarea. 2012. Ecology and conservation of grassland birds in southeastern South America: a review. Journal of Field Ornithology 83:217-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2012.00372.x.

Baselga, A., and C. D. L. Orme. 2012. Betapart: An R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3:808-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00224.x.

Bibby, C., M. Jones, and S. Marsden. 1998. Expedition field techniques: bird surveys. Expedition Advisory Centre, Royal Geographical Society, London, UK.

BirdLife International. 2019. BirdLife International Data Zone. URL: datazone.birdlife.org.

Birkhofer, K., M. M. Gossner, T. Diekötter, C. Drees, O. Ferlian, M. Maraun, S. Scheu, W. W. Weisser, V. Wolters, S. Wurst, A. S. Zaitsev, and H. G. Smith. 2017. Land-use type and intensity differentially filter traits in above- and below-ground arthropod communities. Journal of Animal Ecology 86:511-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12641.

Bregman, T. P., C. H. Sekercioglu, and J. A. Tobias. 2014. Global patterns and predictors of bird species responses to forest fragmentation: Implications for ecosystem function and conservation. Biological Conservation 169:372-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.024.

Brown, A. M., D. I. Warton, N. R. Andrew, M. Binns, G. Cassis, and H. Gibb. 2014. The fourth-corner solution - using predictive models to understand how species traits interact with the environment. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5:344-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12163.

Bryant, J. A., C. Lamanna, H. Morlon, A. J. Kerkhoff, B. J. Enquist, and J. L. Green. 2008. Microbes on mountainsides: contrasting elevational patterns of bacterial and plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105:11505-11511. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801920105.

Cadotte, M. W., K. Carscadden, and N. Mirotchnick. 2011. Beyond species: Functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. Journal of Applied Ecology 48:1079-1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x.

Casanoves, F., L. Pla, and J. A. Di Rienzo. 2011. Valoración y análisis de la diversidad funcional y su relación con los servicios ecosistémicos. Informe técnico 384. Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, CATIE Turrialba, Costa Rica.

Chapman, P. M., J. A. Tobias, D. P. Edwards, and R. G. Davies. 2018. Contrasting impacts of land-use change on phylogenetic and functional diversity of tropical forest birds. Journal of Applied Ecology 55:1604-1614. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13073.

Cofre, H. L., K. Böhning-Gaese, and P. A. Marquet. 2007. Rarity in Chilean forest birds: Which ecological and life-history traits matter? Diversity and Distributions 13:203-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2006.00312.x.

Corbelli, J. M., G. A. Zurita, J. Filloy, J. P. Galvis, N. I. Vespa, and I. Bellocq. 2015. Integrating taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic beta diversities: Interactive effects with the biome and land use across taxa. PLoS ONE 10:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126854.

Cornwell, W. K., and D. D. Ackerly. 2009. Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecological Monographs 79:109-126. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1134.1.

Croci, S., A. Butet, and P. Clergeau. 2008. Does urbanization filter birds on the basis of their biological traits? The Condor 110:223-240. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2008.8409.

de la Peña, M. R. 2013. Nidos y reproducción de las Aves Argentinas. Ediciones Biológica. Serie Naturaleza, Conservación y Sociedad N°8. Santa Fe, Argentina.

de la Peña, M. R. 2016. Aves argentinas: descripción, comportamiento, reproducción y distribución. Comunicaciones del Museo Provincial de Ciencias Naturales “Florentino Ameghino” (Nueva Serie) 20:1-620.

del Hoyo, J., A. Elliott, J. Sargatal, D. A. Christie, and E. de Juana. 2016. Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Lynx Editions. Barcelona, Spain.

Di Bitetti, M. S., G. Placci, and L. A. Dietz. 2003. A biodiversity vision for the Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest ecoregion: Designing a biodiversity conservation landscape and setting priorities for conservation. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, World Wildlife Foundation. Washington, D.C., USA.

Díaz, S., and M. Cabido. 2001. Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:646-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2.

Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., M. V. Cianciaruso, T. F. Rangel, and L. M. Bini. 2011. Eigenvector estimation of phylogenetic and functional diversity. Functional Ecology 25:735-744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01836.x.

Farwig, N., N. Sajita, and K. Böhning-Gaese. 2008. Conservation value of forest plantations for bird communities in western Kenya. Forest Ecology and Management 255:3885-3892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.042.

Filloy, J., G. A. Zurita, and M. I. Bellocq. 2018. Bird diversity in urban ecosystems: The role of the biome and land use along urbanization gradients. Ecosystems 22:213-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-018-0264-y.

Filloy, J., G. A. Zurita, J. M. Corbelli, and M. I. Bellocq. 2010. On the similarity among bird communities: Testing the influence of distance and land use. Acta Oecologica 36:333-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2010.02.007.

Flynn, D. F. B., M. Gogol-Prokurat, T. Nogeire, N. Molinari, B. T. Richers, B. B. Lin, N. Simpson, M. M. Mayfield, and F. DeClerck. 2009. Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecology Letters 12:22-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01255.x.

Galindo Leal, C., and I. de Gusmão Câmara. 2003. The Atlantic Forest of South America: biodiversity status, threats, and outlook. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.

Garaffa, P. I., J. Filloy, and M. I. Bellocq. 2009. Bird community responses along urban-rural gradients: Does the size of the urbanized area matter? Landscape and Urban Planning 90:33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.004.

Gascon, C., T. E. Lovejoy, R. O. Bierregaard, J. R. Malcolm, P. C. Stouffer, H. L. Vasconcelos, W. F. Laurance, B. Zimmerman, M. Tocher, and S. Borges. 1999. Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants. Biological Conservation 91:223-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00080-4.

Hausner, V. H., N. G. Yoccoz, and R. A. Ims. 2003. Selecting indicator traits for monitoring land use impacts: Birds in Northern Coastal Birch Forests. Ecological Applications 13:999-1012. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)13[999:SITFML]2.0.CO;2.

Hothorn, T., F. Bretz, and P. Westfall. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50:346-363. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425.

INBIO. 2008. Superficie Cultivada con Soja. URL: www.inbio.org.py.

Instituto Forestal Nacional. 2013. Programa de apoyo a las exportaciones paraguayas. Proyecto “Promoción de las plantaciones forestales”. Informe Final. Instituto Forestal Nacional, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Asociación Rural del Paraguay. San Lorenzo, Paraguay.

Jaccard, P. 1912. The distribution of the flora in the Alpine zone. New Phytologist 11:37-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x.

Kindt, R., and R. Coe. 2005. Tree diversity analysis: a manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies. World Agroforestry Centre. Nairobi, Kenia.

Kraft, N. J. B., P. B. Adler, O. Godoy, E. C. James, S. Fuller, and J. M. Levine. 2015. Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor. Functional Ecology 29:592-599. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12345.

Laliberté, E., and P. Legendre. 2010. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91:299-305. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2244.1.

Lawton, J. H., D. E. Bignell, B. Bolton, G. F. Bloemers, P. Eggleton, H. P. M, M. Hodda, R. D. Holt, T. B. Larsen, N. A. Mawdsley, N. E. Stork, D. S. Srivastava, and A. D. Watt. 1998. Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391:72-76. https://doi.org/10.1038/34166.

López-Lanús, B., P. Grilli, A. S. Di Giacomo, E. E. Coconier, and R. Banchs. 2008. Categorización de las aves de la Argentina según su estado de conservación. Informe. Aves Argentinas/Asociación Ornitológica del Plata y Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Loyn, R. H., E. G. McNabb, P. Macak, and P. Noble. 2007. Eucalypt plantations as habitat for birds on previously cleared farmland in south-eastern Australia. Biological Conservation 137:533-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.03.012.

Luck, G. W., A. Carter, and L. Smallbone. 2013. Changes in bird functional diversity across multiple land uses: Interpretations of functional redundancy depend on functional group identity. PLoS ONE 8:e63671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01974.x.

Luck, G. W., S. Lavorel, S. Mcintyre, and K. Lumb. 2012. Improving the application of vertebrate trait-based frameworks to the study of ecosystem services. Journal of Animal Ecology 81:1065-1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01974.x.

Lundberg, J., and F. Moberg. 2003. Mobile link organisms and ecosystem functioning: Implications for ecosystem resilience and management. Ecosystems 6:87-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0150-4.

MacArthur, R. H., and J. W. MacArthur. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42:594-598. https://doi.org/10.2307/1932254.

Magurran, A. E. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

Mason, N. W. H., D. Mouillot, W. G. Lee, and J. B. Wilson. 2005. Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: The primary components of functional diversity. Oikos 111:112-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13886.x.

Mayfield, M. M., S. P. Bonser, J. W. Morgan, I. Aubin, S. McNamara, and P. A. Vesk. 2010. What does species richness tell us about functional trait diversity? Predictions and evidence for responses of species and functional trait diversity to land-use change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19:423-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00532.x.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C. USA.

Morse, N. B., P. A. Pellissier, E. N. Cianciola, R. L. Brereton, M. M. Sullivan, and K. Nicholas. 2014. Novel ecosystems in the Anthropocene: a revision of the novel ecosystem concept for pragmatic applications. Ecology and Society 19:12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06192-190212.

Mueller-Dombois, D., and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley, New York, USA.

Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. da Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501.

Narosky, S., D. Yzurieta, and H. Matarasso. 2010. Aves de Argentina y Uruguay: guía de identificación. Birds of Argentina and Uruguay: a field guide. Vazquez Mazzini. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Newbold, T., J. P. W. Scharlemann, S. H. M. Butchart, Ç. H. Şekercioğlu, L. Joppa, R. Alkemade, and D. W. Purves. 2014. Functional traits, land-use change and the structure of present and future bird communities in tropical forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography 23:1073-1084. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12186.

Oksanen, J., F. G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P. R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. H. H. Stevens, and H. Wagner. 2016. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-7. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

Oliveira-Filho, A. T., and M. A. L. Fontes. 2000. Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic Forests in Southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica 32:793-810. https://doi.org/10.1646/0006-3606(2000)032[0793:POFDAA]2.0.CO;2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00619.x.

Palacio, F. X., L. M. Ibañez, R. E. Maragliano, and D. Montalti. 2018. Urbanization as a driver of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity losses in bird communities. Canadian Journal of Zoology 96:1114-1121. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2018-0008.

Peh, K. S. H., N. S. Sodhi, J. de Jong, C. H. Sekercioglu, C. A. M. Yap, and S. L. H. Lim. 2006. Conservation value of degraded habitats for forest birds in southern Peninsular Malaysia. Diversity and Distributions 12:572-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00257.x.

Petchey, O. L., A. Hector, and K. J. G. Gaston. 2004. How do different measures of functional diversity perform? Ecology 85:847-857. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0226.

Petchey, O. L., and K. J. Gaston. 2007. Dendrograms and measuring functional diversity. Oikos 116:1422-1426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15894.x.

Petit, L. J., and D. R. Petit. 2003. Evaluating the importance of human‐modified lands for neotropical bird conservation. Conservation Biology 17:687-694. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.00124.x.

Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, S. DebRoy, and D. Sarkar. 2014. R Core Team. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-117. URL: CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme

R Core Team. 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL: www.r-project.org.

Rakotoarisoa, J.-E., and A. P. Capparella. 2013. Forest-bird species assemblages in the lowland rainforest of Madagascar: The effects of forest fragmentation revisited. The Open Conservation Biology Journal 7:27-41. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874839201307010027.

Ralph, C. J., G. R. Geupel, P. Pyle, T. E. Martin, D. F. DeSante, B. Milá, C. John, R. Geoffrey, E. Thomas, and F. David. 1996. Manual de métodos de campo para el monitoreo de aves terrestres. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, CA. https://doi.org/10.2737/PSW-GTR-159.

Ribeiro, M. C., J. P. Metzger, A. C. Martensen, F. J. Ponzoni, and M. M. Hirota. 2009. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 142:1141-1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021.

Sayer, C. A., J. M. Bullock, and P. A. Martin. 2017. Dynamics of avian species and functional diversity in secondary tropical forests. Biological Conservation 211:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.004.

Schleuter, D., M. Daufresne, F. Massol, and C. Argillier. 2010. A user’s guide to functional diversity indices. Ecological Monographs 80:469-484. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2225.1.

Sekercioglu, C. H. 2006. Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:464-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.007.

Sekercioglu, C. H. 2012. Bird functional diversity and ecosystem services in tropical forests, agroforests and agricultural areas. Journal of Ornithology 153:153-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-012-0869-4.

Sekercioglu, C. H., G. C. Daily, and P. R. Ehrlich. 2004. Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101:18042-18047. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408049101.

Sekercioglu, C. H., S. R. Loarie, F. Oviedo Brenes, P. R. Ehrlich, and G. C. Daily. 2007. Persistence of forest birds in the Costa Rican agricultural countryside. Conservation Biology 21:482-494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00655.x.

Seress, G., and A. Liker. 2015. Habitat urbanization and its effects on birds. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 61:373-408. https://doi.org/10.17109/AZH.61.4.373.2015.

Stein, A., K. Gerstner, and H. Kreft. 2014. Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecology Letters 17:866-880. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12277.

Swenson, N. G. 2011. Phylogenetic beta diversity metrics, trait evolution and inferring the functional beta diversity of communities. PLoS ONE 6:e21264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021264.

Swenson, N. G., P. Anglada-Cordero, and J. A. Barone. 2011. Deterministic tropical tree community turnover: evidence from patterns of functional beta diversity along an elevational gradient. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278:877-884. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1369.

Tabarelli, M., A. V. Aguiar, M. C. Ribeiro, and J. P. Metzger. 2010. Prospects for biodiversity conservation in the Atlantic Forest: Lessons from aging human-modified landscapes. Biological Conservation 143:2328-2340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.005.

Temperton, V. M. 2004. Assembly rules and restoration ecology: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. Island Press. Washington, D.C., USA.

Tilman, D. 2001. Functional diversity. In Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384719-5.00061-7.

Tinoco, B. A., V. E. Santillán, and C. H. Graham. 2018. Land use change has stronger effects on functional diversity than taxonomic diversity in tropical Andean hummingbirds. Ecology and Evolution 8:3478-3490. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3813.

Tscharntke, T., C. H. Sekercioglu, T. V. Dietsch, N. S. Sodhi, P. Hoehn, and J. M. Tylianakis. 2008. Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems. Ecology 89:944-951. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0455.1.

Vaccaro, A., J. Filloy, and M. Bellocq. 2019. What land use better preserves the functional and taxonomic diversity of birds in a grassland biome? Avian Conservation and Ecology 14:1. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-01293-140101.

Van Bael, S. A., J. D. Brawn, and S. K. Robinson. 2003. Birds defend trees from herbivores in a Neotropical forest canopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100:8304-7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1431621100.

Vandewalle, M., F. de Bello, M. P. Berg, T. Bolger, S. Dolédec, F. Dubs, C. K. Feld, R. Harrington, P. A. Harrison, S. Lavorel, P. M. da Silva, M. Moretti, J. Niemelä, P. Santos, T. Sattler, J. P. Sousa, M. T. Sykes, A. J. Vanbergen, and B. A. Woodcock. 2010. Functional traits as indicators of biodiversity response to land use changes across ecosystems and organisms. Biodiversity and Conservation 19:2921-2947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9798-9.

Villéger, S., N. W. H. Mason, and D. Mouillot. 2008. New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 89:2290-2301. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1206.1.

Violle, C., M. L. Navas, D. Vile, E. Kazakou, C. Fortunel, I. Hummel, and E. Garnier. 2007. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116:882-892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15559.x.

Waltert, M., A. Mardiastuti, and M. Mühlenberg. 2004. Effects of land use on bird species richness in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Conservation Biology 18:1339-1346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00127.x.

Wotton, D. M., and D. Kelly. 2011. Frugivore loss limits recruitment of large-seeded trees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278:3345-3354. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.0185.

Xeno-canto-Foundation. 2018. Xeno-canto website. URL: www.xeno-canto.org.

Zipperer, W. C., S. S. Sisinni, R. R. Pouyat, and T. T. Foresman. 1997. Urban tree cover: an ecological perspective. Urban Ecosystems 1:229-246. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018587830636.

Zurita, G. A., and M. I. Bellocq. 2010. Spatial patterns of bird community similarity: Bird responses to landscape composition and configuration in the Atlantic forest. Landscape Ecology 25:147-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9410-4.

Zurita, G. A., and M. I. Bellocq. 2012. Bird assemblages in anthropogenic habitats: identifying a suitability gradient for native species in the Atlantic Forest. Biotropica 44:412-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00821.x.

Taxonomic and functional bird diversity: Differences between anthropogenic habitats in a subtropical forest

Archivos adicionales

Publicado

2019-11-17

Cómo citar

Vaccaro, A. S., & Bellocq, M. I. (2019). Diversidad taxonómica y funcional de aves: Diferencias entre hábitats antrópicos en un bosque subtropical. Ecología Austral, 29(3), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.19.29.3.0.873