How do ideas arise? Some suggestions to stimulate the generation of original projects in ecology

Authors

  • Alejandro G. Farji-Brener Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Hormigas (LIHO) - INIBIOMA - CONICET y Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche. San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.21.31.2.0.1214

Keywords:

atypical, ecological projects, nonconformity, setbacks

Abstract

Researchers in ecology try to develop projects based on novel ideas, but, as good human beings we are, we have a limited capacity for creativity. Therefore, it is usual for us, during our academic life, to generate only few really original ideas. Knowing how original ideas arise becomes vital. If we are at the beginning of our academic life, it will facilitate the development of our first independent projects; and if we are at the end of our career, it may lengthen the creative stage of our professional life. In this essay, I will first describe some suggestions to stimulate the generation of original projects in ecology, detailing the context where they were conceived. Finally, I will propose an integrative conceptual framework whose use may favor the occurrence of original ideas. Based on detailed personal experiences in the text, I identify three key aspects that may stimulate the generation of creativity: nonconformity with dominant ideas, the existence of setbacks and attention to the atypical. Extreme levels of these aspects are counterproductive. Minimal dosages of nonconformity, setbacks, or attention to the outliers undermine creativity because they stimulate conformity, comfort, and focus only on the rule. But too high levels also limit the generation of original ideas because it limits an integrative vision, causes exasperation and prevents us from seeing the phenomenon context. Consequently, I consider that the generation of original ideas is maximized with intermediate levels of nonconformity, setbacks and attention to the atypical. To stimulate ecology projects based on original ideas, I suggest having some level of nonconformity about the dominant ideas, considering small setbacks as opportunities and paying attention to the atypical without neglecting the context where they come from.

References

Charnov, E. L. 1976. Optimal foraging: The marginal value theorem Theoretical Population Biology 9:129-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-X.

Coley, P. D. 1983. Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecological Monographs 53:209-234. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942495.

Connell, J. H. 1971. On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. Pp. 298-312 in den Boer, P. J. and G. R. Gradwell (eds.). Dynamics of Numbers in Populations. PUDOC, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Currie, C. R., J. A. Scott, R. C. Summerbell, and D. Malloch. 1999. Fungus-growing ants use antibiotic-producing bacteria to control garden parasites. Nature 398:701-704. https://doi.org/10.1038/19519.

Dawkins, R. 1982. The extended phenotype (Vol. 8). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Díaz, S., and M. Cabido. 2001. Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:646-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2.

Dirzo, R., and A. Miranda. 1991. Altered patterns of herbivory and diversity in the forest understory: a case study of the possible consequences of contemporary defaunation. Pp. 273-287 in Plant-animal interactions: evolutionary ecology in tropical and temperate regions. Wiley, New York.

Elisondo, R. C. 2016. Creatividad y Ciencias Un estudio biográfico de científicos argentinos. Ciencia, Docencia y Tecnología 27(52):6.

Elisondo, R. C., D. S. Donolo, and M. CC. Rinaudo. 2012. Houssay, Leloir y Milstein: procesos creativos en las ciencias. Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Argentina. Fundamentos en Humanidades II(26):99-114.

Farji Brener, A. G., and J. Protomastro. 1992. Patrones forrajeros de dos especies simpátricas de hormigas cortadoras de hojas (Attini, Acromyrmex) en el Chaco seco. Ecotrópicos 5:32-43.

Farji Brener, A. G., and J. F. Silva. 1995a. Leaf-cutting ants and forest groves in a tropical parkland savanna of Venezuela: facilitated succession? Journal of Tropical Ecology 11:651-669. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400009202.

Farji Brener, A. G., and J. F. Silva. 1995b. Leaf-cutting ant nests and soil fertility in a well-drained savanna in western Venezuela. Biotropica 27:250-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389001.

Farji-Brener, A. G., and A. Illes. 2000. Do leaf-cutting ant nests make ‘bottom up’ gaps in Neotropical rain forests? A critical review of the evidence. Ecology Letters 3:219-227. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00134.x.

Farji-Brener, A. G., and C. Medina. 2000. The importance of where to dump the refuse: seed banks and fine roots in nests of the leaf-cutting ants Atta cephalotes and Atta colombica. Biotropica 32:120-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00454.x.

Farji-Brener, A. G., and L. Ghermandi. 2000. The influence of nests of leaf-cutting ants on plant species diversity in road verges of northern Patagonia. Journal of Vegetation Science 11:453-460. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236638.

Farji-Brener, A. G., F. Chinchilla, S. Rikkin, A. M. Sánchez-Cuervo, E. Triana, V. Quiroga, and P. Giraldo. 2011. The “truck-driver” effect in leaf-cutting ants: how individual load influences the walking speed of nest-mates. Physiological Entomology 36:128-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.2010.00771.x.

Farji-Brener, A. G., F. Chinchilla, m. N. Umaña, M. E. Ocasio-Torres, A. Chauta-Mellizo, D. Acosta-Rojas, et al. 2015. Branching angles reflect a trade‐off between reducing trail maintenance costs or travel distances in leaf‐cutting ants. Ecology 96:510-517. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0220.1.

Farji-Brener, A. G., L. Elizalde, H. Fernández-Marín, and S. Amador-Vargas. 2016. Social life and sanitary risks: evolutionary and current ecological conditions determine waste management in leaf-cutting ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society - Series B 283:20160625. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0625.

Goutte, S., M. J. Mason, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, F. Montealegre-Z, B. D. Chivers, F. A. Sarria-S, et al. 2017. Evidence of auditory insensitivity to vocalization frequencies in two frogs. Scientific Reports 7:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12145-5.

Grime, J. P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist 111:1169-1194. https://doi.org/10.1086/283244.

Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press.

Janzen, D. H. 1970. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am Nat 104:501-528. https://doi.org/10.1086/282687.

Janzen, D. H., and P. S. Martin. 1982. Neotropical anachronisms: the fruits the gomphotheres ate. Science 215:19-27. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.215.4528.19.

Kozbelt, A., R. A. Beghetto, and M. A. Runco. 2010. Theories of creativity. Pp. 20-46 in Kaufman, J. C. and R. J. Sternberg (eds.). Cambridge handbook of creativity. Chapter 2. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.004.

Kuijt, J. 1969. The biology of parasitic flowering plants. University of California Press, Berkeley. The biology of parasitic flowering plants. University of California Press, Berkeley.

Lawton, J. 1996. Patterns in ecology. Oikos 75:145-147. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546237.

Marone, L., and González del Solar, N. 2007. Crítica, creatividad y rigor: vértices de un triángulo culturalmente valioso. Interciencia 32:354-357.

Rapoport, E. H. 1982. Aerography: geographical strategies of species. Pergamon.

Reynolds, H. T., and C. R. Currie. 2004. Pathogenicity of Escovopsis weberi: the parasite of the attine ant-microbe symbiosis directly consumes the ant-cultivated fungus. Mycologia 96:955-959. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2005.11832895.

Tilman, D. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691209654.

Underwood, A. J., M. G. Chapman, and S. D. Connell. 2000. Observations in ecology: you can’t make progress on processes without understanding the patterns. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 250:97-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00181-7.

Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press. Cambridge (MA).

¿Cómo surgen las ideas? Algunas sugerencias para estimular la generación de proyectos originales en ecología

Published

2021-03-31

How to Cite

Farji-Brener, A. G. (2021). How do ideas arise? Some suggestions to stimulate the generation of original projects in ecology. Ecología Austral, 31(2), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.21.31.2.0.1214