Rarity patterns and conservation priorities in Cactaceae species from the Southern Central Andes: a case study from the Calchaquíes Valleys, Salta, Argentina

Authors

  • Ana C. Godoy-Bürki Instituto de Botánica Darwinion (IBODA)-CONICET. San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Lone Aagesen Instituto de Botánica Darwinion (IBODA)-CONICET. San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Jesus M. Sajama Laboratorio de Investigaciones Botánicas (LABIBO)-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta. Salta, Argentina.
  • Silvia A. Bravo Laboratorio de Investigaciones Botánicas (LABIBO)-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta. Salta, Argentina.
  • Mariana Alonso-Pedano Laboratorio de Investigaciones Botánicas (LABIBO)-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta. Salta, Argentina.
  • Pablo Ortega-Baes Laboratorio de Investigaciones Botánicas (LABIBO)-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta. Salta, Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.16.26.2.0.106

Abstract

In this study, 34 Cactaceae species from the Calchaquíes Valleys, Argentina, were studied to determine 1) species rarity level, 2) proportion of rare species among taxonomic and ecological groups and, 3) whether rareness is consistently distributed throughout the species geographical ranges. We used a model where rarity is defined by the geographic range and the local population size to define species rarity. Rareness was not concentrated in any particular taxonomic or ecological group of Cactaceae; however 28 species were rare at some level. In most species, rarity varied across the geographical range, only five species remained consistently rare in all the surveyed populations. Six species qualified as extremely rare, all from the Cactoideae subfamily, four endemic to the southernmost Central Andes and differing in their growth forms. Only two of the 34 studied species, appeared as both extremely and consistently rare across its distribution. Determining rarity levels is useful for identifying species that may be in danger and/or in need for further studies. Rarity, used as an indicator of species vulnerability, allowed us, to identify Cactaceae species that are more vulnerable to anthropogenic or natural disturbance, compared with common species. Many of the Cactaceae species identified here as rare were mentioned by IUCN at intermediate categories of extinction. Our approach seems then to yield useful results and rareness in the present context appears to be related with vulnerability to extinction within the southernmost Central Andes.

Author Biography

Jesus M. Sajama, Laboratorio de Investigaciones Botánicas (LABIBO)-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta. Salta, Argentina.

Universidad Nacional de Salta

References

Arita, H; JG Robinson & KH Redford. 1990. Rarity in Neotropical forest mammals and its ecological correlates. Conserv. Biol., 4:181-192.

Bianchi, R & C Yáñez. 1992. Las Precipitaciones en el Noroeste Argentino. 2a ed. INTA, EEA Salta.

Bianchi, AR. 1996. Temperaturas medias estimadas para la Región Noroeste de Argentina. INTA, EEA Salta.

Boyle, TH & E Anderson. 2002. Biodiversity and Conservation. Pp. 125-141 in: Nobel, PS (ed.). Cacti. Biology and Uses. University of California Press, Los Angeles.

Broennimann, O; P Vittoz; D Moser & A Guisan. 2005. Rarity types among plant species with high conservation priority in Switzerland. Bot. Helv., 115:95-108.

Cardillo, M; GM Mace; KE Jones; J Bielby; ORP Bininda-Emonds; et al. 2005. Multiple Causes of High Extinction Risk in Large Mammal Species. Science, 309:1239-1241.

Clark-Tapia, R; MC Mandujano; T Valverde; A Mendoza & F Molina-Freaner. 2005. How important is clonal recruitment for population maintenance in rare plant species? The case of the narrow endemic cactus, Stenocereus eruca, in Baja California, Mexico. Biological Conservation, 124:123-132.

Crain, BJ; JW White & SJ Steinberg. 2011. Geographic discrepancies between global and local rarity richness patterns and the implications for conservation. Biodiv. Conserv., 20:3489-3500.

Di Rienzo, JA; F Casanoves; MG Balzarini; L González; M Tablada; et al. 2013. InfoStat versión 2013. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. http://www.infostat.com.ar.

Dobson, S; J Yu & A Smith. 1995. The importance of evaluating rarity. Conserv. Biol., 9:1648-1651.

Duncan, RP & JR Young. 2000. Determinants of plant extinction and rarity 145 years after European settlement of Auckland, New Zeeland. Ecol., 81:3048-3061.

Edwards, W & M Westoby. 2000. Families with the highest proportions of rare plants are not consistent between floras. J. Biogeogr., 27:733-740.

Elith, J; CH Graham & RP Anderson. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions form occurrence data. Ecography, 29:129-151.

Esparza-Olguín, L; T Valverde & MC Mandujano. 2005. Comparative demographic analysis of three Neobuxbaumia species (Cactaceae) with differing degree of rarity. Popul. Ecol., 47:229-245.

ESRI, 2011. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.

Fisher, RA. 1954. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd.

Gaston, KJ. 1994. Rarity. Chapman and Hall, London.

Gaston, KJ & T Blackburn. 1995. Rarity and Body Size: Some Cautionary Remarks. Conserv. Biol., 9:210-213.

Gaston, KJ. 2009. Geographic range limits of species. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci., 276:1391-1393.

Godínez-Álvarez, H; T Valverde & P Ortega-Baes. 2003. Demographic Trends in the Cactaceae. Bot. Rev., 69:173-203.

Godoy-Bürki, AC; P Ortega-Baes; J Sajama & L Aagesen. 2014. Conservation priorities in the Southern Central Andes: mismatch between endemism and diversity hotspots in the regional flora. Biodiv. Conserv., 23:81-107.

Grau, RH; IN Gasparri & MT Aide. 2005. Agriculture expansion and deforestation in seasonally dry forests of north-west Argentina. Environ. Conserv., 32:140-148.

Hernández, HM; C Gómez-Hinostrosa & G Hoffmann. 2010. Is geographical rarity frequent among the cacti of the Chihuahuan Desert. Rev. Mex. Biodiv., 81:163-175.

Hernández, HM & H Godínez. 1994. Contribución al conocimiento de las cactáceas mexicanas amenazadas. Acta Bot. Mex., 26:33-52.

Hernández, PA; CH Graham; LL Master & DL Albert. 2006. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography, 29:773-785.

Hijmans, RJ; SE Cameron; JL Parra; PG Jones & A Jarvis. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Clim., 25:1965-1978.

Hunt, D. 1999. CITES. Cactaceae checklist. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew and International Organization of Succulent Plant Study, United Kingdom.

IUCN. Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014-3 (www.iucnredlist.org).

Johnson, CN. 1998. Species extinction and the relationship between distribution and abundance. Nature, 394:272-274.

Kaye, TN; RJ Meinke; J Kagan; S Vrilakas; KL Chambers; et al. 1997. Patterns of rarity in the Oregon flora: implications for conservation and management. Conservation and management of native plants and fungi. Native Plant Society of Oregon, Corvallis, OR.

Kunin, W & KJ Gaston. 1997. The biology of rarity. Chapman and Hall, London.

Melbourne, BA & Hastings A. 2008. Extinction risk depends strongly on factors contributing to stochasticity. Nature, 454:100-103.

Mc Intyre, S; Z Huang & A Smith. 1993. Patterns of abundance in grassy vegetation of the New England Tablelands. Identifying regional rarity in a threatened vegetation type. Aust. J. Bot., 41:49-64.

Minetti, JL. 2005. El clima del noroeste argentino. Ed. Magna, Tucumán. Pp. 449.

Murray, BR; BL Rice; DA Keith; PJ Myerscough; J Howel; et al. 1999. Species in the tail of rank-abundance curves. Ecol., 80:1806-1816.

Murray, B; P Thrall; M Gill & A Nicotra. 2002. How plant life-history and ecological traits relate to species rarity and commonness at varying spatial scales. Austral Ecol., 27:291-310.

Murray, B & B Lepschi. 2004. Are locally rare species abundant elsewhere in their geographical range? Austral Ecol., 29:287-293.

Myers, N; R Miuermeier; C Miuermeier; G Da Fonseca & L Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403:853-858.

Nobel, PS. 2002. Cacti. Biology and uses. Univ of California Press, Los Angeles, USA.

Oldfield, S. 1997. Cactus and succulent plants: status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC cactus and succulent specialist group. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural resources, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.

Ortega-Baes, P & H Godinez-Alvarez. 2006. Global diversity and conservation priorities in the Cactaceae. Biodiv Conserv 15:817-827.

Ortega-Baes, P; S Sühring; J Sajama; E Sotola; M Alonso-Pedano; et al. 2010a. Diversity and conservation in the cactus family. Pp. 157-173 in: Ramawat, KG (ed.). Biology and Biotechnology of desert plant, Springer, London.

Ortega-Baes, P; M Aparicio-González; G Galíndez; P Del Fueyo; S Sühring; et al. 2010b. Are cactus growth forms related to germination responses to light? A test using Echinopsis species. Acta Oecol., 36:339-342.

Pearce, J & S Ferrier. 2000. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol. Model., 133:225-245.

Phillips, S; R Anderson & R Schapire. 2006. Maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model., 190:231-259.

Philips, S & M Dudik. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 31:161-175.

Pilgrim, ES; MJ Crawley & K Dolphin. 2004. Patterns of rarity in the native British flora. Biol. Conserv., 120:161-170.

Pitman, NCA; MR Silman & JW Terborgh. 1999. Tree species distributions in an upper Amazonian forest. Ecol., 80:2651-2661.

Reveal, J. 1981. The concepts of rarity and population threats in plant communities. Pp. 41-46 in: Morse, L & M Henefin (eds.). Rare Plant Conservation. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronxs.

Ruedas, M; T Valverde & JA Zavala-Hurtado. 2006. Analysis of the factors that affect the distribution and abundance of three Neobuxbaumia species (Cactaceae) that differ in their degree of rarity. Acta Oecol., 29:155-164.

Saravia-Tamayo, M. 2006. Patrones de diversidad y rareza de cactus en los Valles Calchaquíes (Salta, Argentina): implicaciones para su conservación. Master’s thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Söderström, L; A Séneca & M Santos. 2007. Rarity patterns in members of the Lophoziaceae/Scapaniaceae complex occurring North of the Tropics–Implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv., 135:352-359.

Strecker, MR; RN Alonso; B Bookhagen; B Carrapa; GE Hilley; et al. 2007. Tectonics and climate of the southern central Andes. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci., 35:747-787.

Zuloaga, FO; Morrone O & Rodríguez D. 1999. Análisis de la biodiversidad en plantas vasculares de la Argentina. Kurtziana, 27:17-167.

Zuloaga, FO; O Morrone & M Belgrano. 2008. Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares del Cono Sur. Monographs in Systematic Botany 107, MO Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Pp. 3384.

Patrones de rareza y prioridades de conservación en especies de Cactaceae del sur de los Andes Centrales: un estudio en los Valles Calchaquíes, Salta, Argentina

Published

2016-04-13

How to Cite

Godoy-Bürki, A. C., Aagesen, L., Sajama, J. M., Bravo, S. A., Alonso-Pedano, M., & Ortega-Baes, P. (2016). Rarity patterns and conservation priorities in Cactaceae species from the Southern Central Andes: a case study from the Calchaquíes Valleys, Salta, Argentina. Ecología Austral, 26(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.16.26.2.0.106