The impact of variations in floral morphology on pollinator visits and reproductive success of the Cytisus scoparius shrub
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.20.30.3.0.1147Keywords:
floral banner, floral symmetry, Patagonia, pollinationAbstract
To know the effect of floral morphology on the visitation frequency of pollinators and their consequences on reproduction is key to understand the ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions. We determined if variations in the area and symmetry of the floral banner affect the frequency of pollinator visits and seed production in the shrub Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link (broom). During the flowering period, we followed a large number of flowers that presented natural variation in the area and symmetry of their banners, and we carried out manipulative experiments in the field modifying these characteristics. Finally, we determined the visitation frequency and the seed production/fruit of each flower. While the symmetry of the banner showed a frequency distribution with a vast majority of cases centered in almost perfect symmetry, the banner area presented a flatter normal curve, with a high frequency of cases around the mean. The visited flowers along the sampled period showed more symmetrical banners, but with similar area than the unvisited flowers; the probability of visits were associated with the symmetry of the banner, but not with its area. The field experiment showed that flowers with a banner reduced to 50%, but maintaining their symmetry, were much more visited and produced more seeds/fruit than those with the banner reduced to 50% without maintaining its symmetry. These results suggest that, in Cytisus scoparius, the symmetry of the banner is a key aspect of floral morphology to attract pollinators. The low rate of visited flowers with highly asymmetric banners could be due to a reduction in floral recognition or because it is perceived by visitors as a flower damage, which may be interpreted as a sign of a low reward level. This work highlights the importance of symmetry as an attractive signal for pollinators, and illustrates how the variation of these traits within the same species can affect reproductive success, and therefore be subject to natural selection.
References
Aizen, M. A., and E. Raffaele. 1998. Flowering‐shoot defoliation affects pollen grain size and postpollination pollen performance in Alstroemeria aurea. Ecology 79:2133-2142. https://doi.org/10.2307/176716. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2133:FSDAPG]2.0.CO;2.
Blarer, A., T. Keasar, and A. Shmida. 2002. Possible mechanisms for the formation of flower size preferences by foraging bumblebees. Ethology 108:341-351. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00778.x.
Bode, R. F., and R. Tong. 2018. Pollinators exert positive selection on flower size on urban, but not on rural Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius L. Link). J of Plant Ecol 11:493-501. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtx024.
Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, M. V. Price, E. A. Lynch, and R. J. Mitchell. 1991. Components of phenotypic selection: pollen export and flower corolla width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 45:1458-1467. https://doi.org/10.2307/2409892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb02648.x.
Cascante-Marín, A., J. H. Wolf, and J. G. B. Oostermeijer. 2009. Wasp florivory decreases reproductive success in an epiphytic bromeliad. Plant Ecol 203:149-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-008-9522-y.
Cohen, D., and A. Shmida. 1993. The evolution of flower display and reward. Evol Biol 27:197-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2878-4_6.
Galen, C. 1989. Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric floral traits: bumblebees and the alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 43:882-890. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb05185.x. https://doi.org/10.2307/2409315.
Gavini, S. S., and A. G. Farji-Brener. 2015. La importancia del color: morfos florales, tasas de visita y éxito reproductivo en el arbusto Sarothamnus scoparius. Ecología Austral 25:204-211. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.15.25.3.0.82.
Giurfa, M., A. Dafni, and P. R. Neal. 1999. Floral symmetry and its role in plant-pollinator systems. Int J of Plant Sciences 160:S41-S50. https://doi.org/10.1086/314214.
Gong, Y. B., and S. Q. Huang. 2009. Floral symmetry: pollinator-mediated stabilizing selection on flower size in bilateral species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276:4013-4020. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1254.
Herrera, C. M., M. C. Castellanos, and M. Medrano. 2006. Geographical context of floral evolution: towards an improved research programme in floral diversification. Pp. 278-294 in L. Hilton (ed.). Ecology and evolution of flowers. Pp. 377. Oxford University Press, U.K.
Knauer, A. C., and F. P. Schiestl. 2014. Bees use honest floral signals as indicators of reward when visiting flowers. Ecol Letters 18:135-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12386.
Krupnick, G. A., A. E. Weis, and D. R. Campbell. 1999. The consequences of floral herbivory for pollinator service to Isomeris arborea. Ecology 80:125-134. https://doi.org/10.2307/176984. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0125:TCOFHF]2.0.CO;2.
McCall A. C., and R. E. Irwin. 2006. Florivory: the intersection of pollination and herbivory. Ecol Letters 9:1351-1365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00975.x.
McCall, A. C. 2008. Florivory affects pollinator visitation and female fitness in Nemophila menziesii. Oecologia 155:729-737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0934-5.
Møller, A. P. 1995. Bumblebee preference for symmetrical flowers. Proc Natl Acad Sci 92:2288-2292. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.6.2288.
Møller, A. P. 2000. Developmental stability and pollination. Oecologia 123:149-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420051000.
Morales, C. L., and M. A. Aizen. 2002. Does invasion of exotic plants promote invasion of exotic flower visitors? A case study from the temperate forests of the southern Andes. Biol Inv 4:87-100. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020513012689.
Neal, P. R., A. Dafni, and M. Giurfa. 1998. Floral symmetry and its role in plant-pollinator systems: terminology, distribution, and hypotheses. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 29:345-373. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.345.
Nuttman, C. V., F. M. Semida, S. Zalat, and P. G. Willmer. 2006. Visual cues and foraging choices: bee visits to floral color phases in Alkanna orientalis (Boraginaceae). Biol J Linnean Soc 87:427-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00582.x.
Orbán, L. L., and C. M. Plowright. 2014. Getting to the start line: how bumblebees and honeybees are visually guided towards their first floral contact. Insec Sociaux 61:325-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-014-0366-2.
Papiorek, S., K. Rohde, and K. Lunau. 2013. Bees’ subtle color preferences: how bees respond to small changes in pigment concentration. Naturwissenschaften 100:633-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-013-1060-3.
Parker, I. M. 1997. Pollinator limitation of Cytisus scoparius (Scotch broom), an invasive exotic shrub. Ecology 78:1457-1470. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1457:PLOCSS]2.0.CO;2. https://doi.org/10.2307/2266140.
Rodríguez-Riaño, T., A. Ortega-Olivencia, and J. Devesa. 1999. Reproductive biology in two Genisteae (Papilionoideae) endemic of the western Mediterranean region: Cytisus striatus and Retama sphaerocarpa Can J Bot 77:809-820. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-77-6-809.
Shrestha, M., K. Lunau, A. Dorin, B. Schulze, M. Bischoff, M. Burd, and A. G. Dyer. 2016. Floral colors in a world without birds and bees: the plants of Macquarie Island. Plant Biol 18:842-850. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12456.
Stanton, M. L., and R. E. Preston. 1988. Ecological consequences and phenotypic correlates of petal size variation in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 75:528-539. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb13471.x.
Sutherland, S., and L. F. Delph. 1984. On the importance of male fitness in plants: patterns of fruit‐set. Ecology 65:1093-1104. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938317.
Suzuki, N. 2003. Significance of flower exploding pollination on the reproduction of the Scotch broom, Cytisus scoparius (Leguminosae). Ecol Res 18:523-532. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2003.00575.x.
Vidal, V. B., and A. G. Farji-Brener. 2020. Lo esencial es invisible a los ojos (humanos): patrones UV explican la mayor tasa de visita de los polinizadores a las flores amarillas del arbusto Cytisus scoparius. Ecología Austral 30:012-018. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.20.30.1.0.911.
Waser, N. M., and M. V. Price. 1985. The effect of nectar guides on pollinator preference: experimental studies with a montane herb. Oecologia 67:121-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378462.
Zhang, C., N. J. Vereecken, L. Wang, B. Tian, A. Dafni, Y. Yang, and Y. Duan. 2017. Are nectar guide colour changes a reliable signal to pollinators that enhances reproductive success? Plant Ecol and Div 10:89-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2017.1350763.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Melina Zuliani, Alejandro Farji-Brener
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.
