Perception of and knowledge about biodiversity by urban and rural students of central-west drylands of Argentina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.13.23.3.0.1172Keywords:
appreciation, attitudes, native species, exotic speciesAbstract
Arid and semiarid ecosystems of Mendoza and San Juan are currently undergoing severe degradation with the subsequent loss of biodiversity. In this scenario, diffusion and education about native biodiversity and its value are indispensable to the purposes of conservation. The present work reviews three previous studies conducted in the provinces of Mendoza and San Juan. This review attempts to reflect the perceptions, knowledge and appreciation of urban and rural students about biodiversity, within the framework of studies conducted worldwide, and discusses the effect of educational interventions aimed at improving knowledge of and attitudes toward biodiversity. Studies find that, although the place of residence, sex and age of students affect their perception and knowledge of biodiversity, overall, children appreciate and know exotic species better than native ones and, just as in the rest of the world, they are familiar with pets, ornamental plants and charismatic mammals. Students learn about biodiversity from different sources; the initial contact of the youngest children with species is through the mass media and books. Children are scarcely familiar with local native species with conservation issues or with their evolutionary adaptations to arid regions. After a short educational intervention, changes in perceptions and knowledge are observed in the short term, but these are lost in the long term. We consider it important to increase efforts in schools, family, non-governmental organizations, etc., to improve knowledge and appreciation of native biodiversity through activities that are maintained over time and involve direct contact with nature.
References
ABRAHAM, E; HF DEL VALLE; F ROIG; L TORRES; JO ARES; ET AL. 2009. Overview of the geography of the Monte Desert biome (Argentina). J. Arid Environm., 73:144-153.
ANDERSON, D & KB LUCAS. 1997. The effectiveness of orienting students to the physical features of a science museum prior to visitation. Res. Sci. Ed., 27:485-495.
ASHWORTH, S; E BOYES; R PATON & M STANISSTREET. 1995. Conservation of endangered species: what do children think? J. Environ. Educ. Inform., 14:229-244.
BADARRACO, RJ. 1973. Squirrels, or sunflowers? Am. Biol. Teach., 35:528-538.
BAIRD, JH; R LAZAROWITZ & V ALLMAN. 1984. Science choices and preferences of middle and secondary school students in Utah. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 21:47-54.
BALMFORD, A; L CLEGG; T COULSON & J TAYLOR. 2002. Why conservationists should heed Pokemon. Science 295:2367.
BARKER, S; D SLINGSBY & S TILLING. 2002. Ecological fieldwork: Is there a problem? Environm. Educ., 71:9-10.
BARQUEZ, RM; M DÍAZ & RA OJEDA. 2006. Mamíferos de Argentina: sistemática y distribución. Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos. Argentina. Pp. 359.
BELL, BF. 1981. When is an animal, not an animal? J. Biol. Educ., 15:213-218.
BERENGER, J; JA CORRALIZA & R MARTÍN. 2005. Rural-urban differences in environmental concern, attitudes, and actions. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess., 21:128-138.
BICKFORD, D; MRC POSA; L QIE; A CAMPOS-ARCEIZ & EP KUDAVIDANAGE. 2012. Science communication for biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv., 151:74-76.
BITGOOD, S. 1989. School field trips: an overview. Visitor Behav., 4:3-6.
BOGNER, FX & M WISEMAN. 1997. Environmental perception of rural and urban pupils. J. Environm. Psychol., 17:111-122.
BORGERHOFF MULDER, M; R SCHACHT; T CAROB; J SCHACHT & B CARO. 2009. Knowledge and attitudes of children of the Rupununi: implications for conservation in Guyana. Biol. Conserv., 142:879-887.
BORGHI, CE. 2004. Biodiversidad de Fauna Silvestre de la zona de influencia del Parque Nacional de San Guillermo: situación de conservación, usos actuales y propuestas de manejo sustentable. Experimentos piloto de uso no consuntivo con fines educativos y turísticos. Administración de Parques
Nacionales. Argentina.
CAMPOS, CM; S GRECO; JJ CIARLANTE; M BALANGIONE; JB BENDER; ET AL. 2012. Students’ familiarity and initial contact with species in the Monte desert (Mendoza, Argentina). J. Arid Environm., 82:98-105.
COLTON, TF & P ALPERT. 1998. Lack of public awareness of biological invasions by plants. Nat. Area J., 18:262-266.
CZECH, B; PR KRAUSMAN & R BORKHATARIA. 1998. Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefits to endangered species. Conserv. Biol., 12:1103-1112.
CHAND, VS & SR SHULKA. 2003. ‘Biodiversity contests’: indigenously informed and transformed environmental education. Appl. Environm. Educ. Commun., 2:229-236.
CITES. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. 2011. www.cites.org/eng/app/appendices.shtml (último acceso: 30711/2012).
DÍAZ, GB & RA OJEDA (eds.). 2000. Libro Rojo de Mamíferos Amenazados de la Argentina. Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos. Argentina.
FALK, JH & JD BALLING. 1982. The field trip milieu: learning and behavior as a function of contextual events. J. Educ. Res., 76:22-28.
FALK, JH & LD DIERKING. 2000. Learning from museums: visitor experiences and the making of meaning. AltaMira Press. USA.
FLANNERY, MC. 1991. Considering plants. Am. Biol. Teach., 53:306-309.
GARCÍA FERNÁNDEZ, JJ; RA OJEDA; RM FRAGA; GB DÍAZ & RJ BAIGÚN. 1997. Libro Rojo de Mamíferos y Aves Amenazados de la Argentina. Fundación para la Conservación de las Especies y el Medio Ambiente, Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos y Asociación Ornitológica del Plata. Argentina.
GIANNONI, SM. 2007. Conociendo para conservar la biodiversidad del Parque Provincial Ischigualasto (Sitio Patrimonio de la Humanidad) y zona de influencia: propuesta educativa para los docentes y la comunidad del Valle. Secretaría de Extensión, Vinculación y Servicios al Medio de la Universidad Nacional de San Juan. Argentina.
GIRAUDO, AR; V ARZAMENDIA; GP BELLINI; CA BESSA; CC CALAMANTE; ET AL. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las Serpientes de la República Argentina. Cuad. Herpetol., 26(Supl. 1):303-326.
GONZALEZ-GAUDIANO, E. 2007. Educación ambiental: trayectorias, rasgos y escenarios. Plaza y Valdés y Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Mexico.
GREAVES, E; M STANISSTREET; E BOYES & T WILLIAMS. 1993. Children’s ideas about rainforests. J. Biol. Educ., 27:189-194.
GUICHÓN, ML. 2006. Educación, difusión y gestión como herramientas para alertar sobre la introducción de especies, tenencia responsable de mascotas y tráfico de fauna: ardillas exóticas como ejemplo regional. Secretaría de Extensión, Vinculación y Servicios al Medio de la Universidad Nacional de Luján. Argentina.
HEERWAGEN, JH & GH ORIANS. 1993. Humans, habitats, and aesthetics. Pp. 138-172 en: Kellert, SR & EO Wilson (eds.). The Biophilia hypothesis. Island Press. Washington. USA.
HERSHEY, DR. 1996. A historical perspective on problems in botany teaching. Am. Biol. Teach., 58:340-347.
HESSE, M. 1983. Artenkenntnis bei Studienanfängern [Taxonomic knowledge of first-year students]. Der Biologieunterricht, 19:94-100.
HUDDART-KENNEDY, E; TM BECKLEY; BL MCFARLANE & S NADEAU. 2009. Rural-urban differences in environmental concern in Canada. Rural Sociol., 74:309-329.
KELLERT, SR. 1980. American’s attitudes and knowledge of animals. Wildlife Management Institute.Washington. USA.
KELLERT, SR. 1985. Attitudes toward animals: age-related development among children. J. Environ. Educ., 16:29-39.
KELLERT, SR & JK BERRY. 1987. Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviours toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Soc. B, 15:363-371.
KELLERT, SR. 1993. The biological base for human values of nature. Pp. 43-69 en: Kellert, SR & EO Wilson (eds.). The Biophilia hypothesis. Island Press. Washington. USA.
KELLERT, SR. 1996. The value of life. Island Press. Washington. USA.
KINCHIN, IM. 1993. Teaching ecology in England and Wales- A survey of current practice. J. Biol. Educ., 27:755-760.
KINCHIN, IM. 1999. Investigating secondary-school girls’ preferences for animals or plants: a simple ‘head-to-head’ comparison using two unfamiliar organisms. J. Biol. Educ., 33:95-99.
KNAPP, D & R POFF. 2001. A qualitative analysis of the immediate and short-term impact of an environmental interpretive program. Environ. Educ. Res., 7:55-65.
JORDAN, R; F SINGER; J VAUGHAN & A BERKOWITZ. 2009. What should every citizen know about ecology? Front. Ecol. Environ., 7:495-500.
LADIO, A & M LOZADA. 2003. Comparison of wild edible plant diversity and foraging strategies in two aboriginal communities of northwestern Patagonia. Biodivers. Conserv., 12:937-951.
LADIO, A; M LOZADA & M WEIGANDT. 2007. Comparison of traditional wild plant knowledge between aboriginal communities inhabiting arid and forest environments in Patagonia, Argentina. J. Arid Environm., 69:695-715.
LADIO, AH & M LOZADA. 2009. Human ecology, ethnobotany and traditional practices in rural populations inhabiting the Monte region: resilience and ecological knowledge. J. Arid Environm., 73:222-227.
LINDEMANN-MATTHIES, P. 2002. The influence of an educational program on children’s perception of biodiversity. J. Environ. Educ., 33:22-31.
LINDEMANN-MATTHIES, P. 2005. ‘Loveable’ mammals and ‘lifeless’ plants: how children’s interest in common local organisms can be enhanced through observation of nature. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 27:655-677.
LINDEMANN-MATTHIES, P. 2006. Investigating Nature on the Way to School: responses to an educational programme by teachers and their pupils. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 28:895-918.
LINDEMANN-MATTHIES, P & E BOSE. 2008. How many species are there? Public understanding and awareness of biodiversity in Switzerland. Hum. Ecol., 38:731-742.
LINDEMANN-MATTHIES, P & T KAMER. 2006. The influence of an interactive educational approach on visitors’ learning in a Swiss zoo. Sci. Educ., 90:296-315.
LOCK, R. 1995. Biology and the environment- A changing perspective? Or “there’s wolves in them there woods!” J. Biol. Educ., 29:3-4.
LOUV, R. 2005. Last child in the woods. Saving our children from nature-deficit-disorder. Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill. North Carolina. USA.
LOWE, GD & TK PINHEY. 1982. Rural-urban differences in support for environmental protection. Rural Sociol., 47: 114-128.
LUCHERINI, M & MJ MERINO. 2008. Perceptions of human- carnivore conflicts in the High Andes of Argentina. Mt. Res. Dev., 28:81-85.
MILLER, JR. 2005. Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol. Evol., 20:430-434.
MONTGOMERY, CA. 2002. Ranking the benefits of biodiversity: an exploration of relative values. J. Environ. Manage., 65:313-326.
MORRIS, D. 1982. Der Mensch mit dem wir leben [Manwatching]. Droemersche Verlagsanstalt. Munich, Alemania.
MORRIS, R & D MORRIS. 1965. Men and snakes. Hutchinson & Co. London. UK.
MORRIS, R & D MORRIS. 1966. Men and pandas. Sphere Books Limited. London. UK.
NATES, J; C CAMPOS & P LINDEMANN-MATTHIES. 2010. Students’ perception of plant and animal species: a case of study from rural Argentina. Appl. Environm. Educ. Commun., 9:131-141.
NATES, J; C CAMPOS & P LINDEMANN-MATTHIES. 2012. The impact of a short conservation education workshop on Argentineans students’ knowledge about and attitudes towards species. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. & Tech. Ed., 8:257-267.
OJEDA, RA & GB DÍAZ. 1997. La categorización de los mamíferos de Argentina. Pp. 73-163 en: García, FJ; RA Ojeda; RM Fraga; GB Díaz & RJ Baigún (eds.). Libro Rojo de los mamíferos y aves amenazados de Argentina. Administración de Parques Nacionales, Buenos Aires.
PARASKEVOPOULOS, S; S PADELIADU & K ZAFIROPOULOS. 1998. Environmental knowledge of elementary school students in Greece. J. Environ. Educ., 29:55-60.
PFLIGERSDORFFER, G. 1991. Die biologisch-ökologische Bildungssituation von Schulabgängern [Biological and ecological knowledge of school-leavers]. Abakus Verlag. Salzburg, Austria.
PIMBERT, MP & JN PRETTY. 1995. Parks, people and professionals putting participation into protected area management. UNRISD Discussion Paper 57. UNRISD-IIED-WWF. Ginebra, Suiza.
PILGRIM, SE; C CULLEN C; DJ SMITH & J PRETTY. 2007. Ecological knowledge is lost in wealthier communities and countries. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42:1004-1009.
POOLEY, JA & M O’CONNOR. 2000. Environmental education and attitudes: emotions and beliefs are what is needed. Environ. Behav., 32:711-723.
PRADO, WS; T WALLER; DA ALBAREDA; MR CABRERA; E ETCHEPARE; ET AL. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las tortugas de la República Argentina. Cuad. Herpetol., 26(Supl. 1):375-387.
REYES-GARCÍA, V; V VADEZ; T HUANCA; W LEONARD; D WILKIE. 2005. Knowledge and consumption of wild plants: a comparative study in two Tsimane’ villages in the Bolivian Amazon. ERA Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 3:201-207.
ROZZI, R; JR SILANDER; JJ ARMESTO; P FEINSINGER & F MASSARDO. 2000. Three levels of integrating ecology with the conservation of South American temperate forests: the initiative of the Institute of Ecological Research Chiloé, Chile. Biodivers. Conserv., 9:1199-1217.
RUIZ-MALLEN, I; L BARRAZA; B BODENHORN & V REYES- GARCÍA. 2009. Evaluating the impact of an environmental education programme: an empirical study in Mexico. Environ. Educ. Res., 15: 371-387.
RYMAN, D. 1974. Children’s understanding of the classification of living organisms. J. Biol. Educ., 8:140-144.
SCHACTER, DL; DT GILBERT & DM WEGNER. 2011. Psychology. Worth Publishers. New York. USA.
SUDARMADI, S; S SUZUKI; T KAWADA; H NETTI; S SOEMANTRI; ET AL. 2001. A survey of perception, knowledge, awareness, and attitude in regard to environmental problems in a sample of two different social groups in Jakarta, Indonesia. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 3:169-183.
TABENI, S & RA OJEDA. 2005. Ecology of the Monte Desert small mammals in disturbed and undisturbed habitats. J. Arid Environm., 63:244-255.
TISDELL, C; C WILSON & HS NANTHA. 2006. Public choice of species for the ‘Ark’: Phylogenetic similarity and preferred wildlife species for survival. J. Nat. Conserv., 14:97-105.
TROMBULAK, SC; KS OMLAND; JA ROBINSON; JJ LUSK; TL FLEISCHNER; ET AL. 2004. Principles of conservation biology: recommended guidelines for conservation literacy from the Education Committee of the Society for Conservation Biology. Conserv. Biol., 18:1180-1190.
TROMMER, G. 1980. Naturschutz im Biologieunterricht- Begriffsbilder bei Schülern der Primarstufe und Sekundarstufe I [Conservation in biology education- Ideas of primary and secondary school students]. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie, 8:503-508.
TUNNICLIFFE, SD. 2001. Talking about plants-comments of primary school groups looking at plant exhibits in a botanical garden. J. Biol. Educ., 36:27-34.
VEITCH, CR & MN CLOUT. 2001. Human dimensions in the management of invasive species in New Zealand. Pp. 63-71 en: McNeely, JA (ed.). The Great Reshuffling: Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species. IUCN.
VILELA, A; ML BOLKOVIC; P CARMANCHAHI; M CONY; D DE LAMO; ET AL. 2009. Past, present and potential uses of native flora and wildlife of the Monte Desert. J. Arid Environm., 73:238-243.
WALSH-DANESHMANDI, A & M MACLACHLAN. 2006. Toward effective evaluation of environmental education: Validity of the children’s environmental attitudes and knowledge scale using data from a sample of Irish adolescents. J. Environm. Educ., 37:13-23.
WANDERSEE, JH. 1986. Plants or animals-which do junior high school students prefer to study? J. Res. Sci. Teach., 23:415-426.
WANDERSEE, JH & EE SCHUSSLER. 1999. Toward a theory of plant blindness. Plant. Sci. Bul., 47:2-9.
WARD, PI; N MOSBERGER; C KISTLER & O FISCHER. 1998. The relationship between popularity and body size in zoo animals. Conserv. Biol., 12:1408-1411.
WEILBACHER, M. 1993. The renaissance of the naturalist. J. Environ. Educ., 25:4-7.
WOODS, B. 2000. Beauty and the beast: preferences for animals in Australia. J. Tourism St., 11:25-34.
YORE, LB & S BOYER. 1997. College students’ attitudes towards living organisms: The influence of experience & knowledge. Am. Biol. Teach., 59:558-563.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Claudia M. Campos, Juliana Nates, Petra Lindemann-Matthies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.
