Spider predation on floral visitors and herbivores, balance between mutualism and antagonism

Authors

  • Mariana Tadey CONICET, Laboratorio Ecotono, CRUB - Universidad Nacional del Comahue, San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina.
  • Roger Ayazo Instituto de Ecología A.C., Veracruz, México.
  • Farah Carrasco-Rueda Center for Conservation Education and Sustainability, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, USA.
  • Yuliana Christopher Centro de Biodiversidad y Descubrimiento de Drogas. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología,Ciudad del Saber, Panamá.
  • Marisol Domínguez Laboratorio de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Giomara La Quay-Velázquez Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Puerto Rico, San Juan, USA.
  • Miriam San José Laboratorio de Ecología de Paisajes Fragmentados, Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.13.23.2.0.1177

Keywords:

trichome density, visitation frequency, fruit set, predation risk

Abstract

Spiders-plant interactions are usually complex and affect their host plants in multiple ways. The lynx spider Peucetia viridans camouflages to hunt flower visitors and herbivores potentially reducing the levels of herbivory and reproduction of their host plant. Plus, these green spiders are usually associated with plant species presenting trichomes, which usually facilitate the spider predation. We determined the balance of this double interaction on the forb Ruellia nudiflora in a dry forest of Costa Rica. In three different sites we performed an experiment changing the spider color to red to determine whether the increment on the spider detectability affects pollinators visitation frequency. We also estimated spider, pollinators and herbivores abundance and the levels of herbivory, trichomes density and fruit set. The presence of the spider was not associated to a decrease in pollinators visitation or fruit set. Spiders were associated to plants with low trichomes density. Herbivory was higher in plants with spiders than in plant without them, however, plants with low herbivory level and without spiders presented higher trichomes density. Sites differed in their assemblages of pollinators and herbivores but this did not affect the interactions studied. This is the first study showing that the spider P. viridans is associated with plants of the same species with low trichome density. If this spider affects pollinators visitations, the adaptive value of trichomes would be double; they reduce herbivory and repel the presence of pollinators predators. These results highlight the relevance of studying both mutualistic and antagonistic interactions to determine their relative importance.

References

ABBOTT, KR. 2006. Bumblebees avoid flowers containing evidence of past predation events. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 84:1240-1247.

ABBOTT, KR. 2010. Background evolution in camouflage systems: A predator–prey/pollinator-flower game. J Theor Biol, 262:662-678.

ARANGO, AM; JL PORTILLO; V PARRA-TABLA; LT HERNÁNDEZ-SALAZAR; JE MORALES-MÁVIL & V RICO-GRAY. 2012. Effect of the spider Peucetia viridans (Oxyopidae) on floral visitors and seed set of Cnidoscolus multilobus (Euphorbiaceae). Acta Botanica Mexicana, 100:1-14.

ARANGO, AM; V RICO-GRAY & V PARRA-TABLA. 2000. Population structure, seasonality, and habitat use by the green lynx spider Peucetia viridans (Oxyopidae) inhabiting Cnidoscolus aconitifolius (Euphorbiaceae). J Arachnol, 28:185-194.

BRECHBÜHL, R; C KROPF & S BACHER. 2010. Impact of flower-dwelling crab spiders on plant-pollinator mutualisms. Basic Appl Ecol, 11:76-82.

DUKAS, R. 2005. Bumble bee predators reduce pollinators density. Ecology, 86:1401-1406.

DUKAS, R. & DH MORSE. 2005. Crab spiders show mixed effects on flower-visiting bees and no effect on plant fitness components. Ecoscience, 12:244-247.

EBELING, A; A KLEIN; J SCHUMACHER; W WEISSER & T TSCHARNTKE. 2008. How does plant richness affect pollinator richness and temporal stability of flower visits? Oikos, 117:1808-1815.

HARE, JD & E ELLE. 2002. Variable impact of diverse insect herbivores on dimorphic Datura wrightii. Ecology, 83:2711-2720.

HIGGINSON, AD; GD RUXTON & J SKELHORN. 2010. The impact of flower-dwelling predators on host plant reproductive success. Oecologia, 164:411-421.

JANZEN, D. 1991. Historia Natural de Costa Rica. Editorial de la Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.

JONES, E & A. DORNHAUS. 2011. Predation risk makes bees reject rewarding flowers and reduce foraging activity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 65:1505-1511.

KUNIN, WE. 1992. Density and reproductive success in wild populations of Diplotaxis erucoides (Brassicaceae). Oecologia, 91:129-133.

LOUDA, SM. 1982. Inflorescence Spiders: A Cost / Benefit Analysis for the Host Plant , Haplopappus venetus Blake (Asteraceae). Oecologia, 55:185-191.

MORAIS-FILHO, JC & GQ ROMERO. 2008. Microhabitat use by Peucetia flava (Oxyopidae) on the glandular plant Rhyncanthera dichotoma (Melastomataceae). J Arachnol, 36:374-378.

MORAIS-FILHO, J.C. & G.Q. ROMERO. 2010. Plant glandular trichomes mediate protective mutualism in a spider-plant system. Ecol Entomol, 35:485-494.

MUNGUÍA-ROSAS, M.; V. PARRA-TABLA; J. OLLERTON & J.C. CERVERA. 2012. Environmental control of reproductive phenology and the effect of pollen supplementation on resource allocation in the cleistogamous weed, Ruellia nudiflora (Acanthaceae). Ann Bot, 109:343-50.

NYFFELER, M; DA DEAN & WL STERLING. 1992. Diets, feeding specialization, and predatory role of two lynx spiders, Oxyopes salticus and Peucetia viridans (Araneae: Oxyopidae) in a Texas cotton agroecosystem. Environ Entomol, 21:1457-1465.

ORTEGÓN-CAMPOS, I; L ABDALA-ROBERTS; V PARRA-TABLA; JC CERVERA; D MARRUFO-ZAPATA & CM HERRERA. 2012. Influence of multiple factors on plant local adaptation: soil type and folivore effects in Ruellia nudiflora (Acanthaceae). Evol Ecol, 26:545-558.

OXFORD, GS & RG GILLESPIE. 1998. Evolution and ecology of spider coloration. Annu Rev Entomol, 43: 619-643.

ROMERO, GQ; P ANTIQUEIRA & J KORICHEVA. 2011. A meta-analysis of predation risk effects on pollinator behaviour. PloS one, 6: e20689.

ROMERO, GQ; JC SOUZA & J. VASCONCELLOS-NETO. 2008. Anti- herbivore protection by mutualistic spiders and the role of plant glandular trichomes. Ecology, 89:3105–3115.

STANG, M; PGL KLINKHAMER & E VAN DER MEIJDEN. 2006. Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant-flower visitor web. Oikos, 112:111–121.

STEVENS, M & S MERILAITA. 2009. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Philos T Roy Soc B, 364: 423–427.

VASCONCELLOS-NETO, J. 2006. Associations of spiders of the genus Peucetia (Oxyopidae) with plants bearing glandular hairs. Biotropica, 39:221-226.

WILLEY, MB & PH ADLER. 1989. Biology of Peucetia viridans (Araneae, Oxyopidae) in south Carolina, with special reference to predation and maternal care. J Arachnol, 17:275-284.

Published

2013-08-01

How to Cite

Tadey, M., Ayazo, R., Carrasco-Rueda, F., Christopher, Y., Domínguez, M., La Quay-Velázquez, G., & San José, M. (2013). Spider predation on floral visitors and herbivores, balance between mutualism and antagonism. Ecología Austral, 23(2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.13.23.2.0.1177