Spider predation on floral visitors and herbivores, balance between mutualism and antagonism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.13.23.2.0.1177Keywords:
trichome density, visitation frequency, fruit set, predation riskAbstract
Spiders-plant interactions are usually complex and affect their host plants in multiple ways. The lynx spider Peucetia viridans camouflages to hunt flower visitors and herbivores potentially reducing the levels of herbivory and reproduction of their host plant. Plus, these green spiders are usually associated with plant species presenting trichomes, which usually facilitate the spider predation. We determined the balance of this double interaction on the forb Ruellia nudiflora in a dry forest of Costa Rica. In three different sites we performed an experiment changing the spider color to red to determine whether the increment on the spider detectability affects pollinators visitation frequency. We also estimated spider, pollinators and herbivores abundance and the levels of herbivory, trichomes density and fruit set. The presence of the spider was not associated to a decrease in pollinators visitation or fruit set. Spiders were associated to plants with low trichomes density. Herbivory was higher in plants with spiders than in plant without them, however, plants with low herbivory level and without spiders presented higher trichomes density. Sites differed in their assemblages of pollinators and herbivores but this did not affect the interactions studied. This is the first study showing that the spider P. viridans is associated with plants of the same species with low trichome density. If this spider affects pollinators visitations, the adaptive value of trichomes would be double; they reduce herbivory and repel the presence of pollinators predators. These results highlight the relevance of studying both mutualistic and antagonistic interactions to determine their relative importance.
References
ABBOTT, KR. 2006. Bumblebees avoid flowers containing evidence of past predation events. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 84:1240-1247.
ABBOTT, KR. 2010. Background evolution in camouflage systems: A predator–prey/pollinator-flower game. J Theor Biol, 262:662-678.
ARANGO, AM; JL PORTILLO; V PARRA-TABLA; LT HERNÁNDEZ-SALAZAR; JE MORALES-MÁVIL & V RICO-GRAY. 2012. Effect of the spider Peucetia viridans (Oxyopidae) on floral visitors and seed set of Cnidoscolus multilobus (Euphorbiaceae). Acta Botanica Mexicana, 100:1-14.
ARANGO, AM; V RICO-GRAY & V PARRA-TABLA. 2000. Population structure, seasonality, and habitat use by the green lynx spider Peucetia viridans (Oxyopidae) inhabiting Cnidoscolus aconitifolius (Euphorbiaceae). J Arachnol, 28:185-194.
BRECHBÜHL, R; C KROPF & S BACHER. 2010. Impact of flower-dwelling crab spiders on plant-pollinator mutualisms. Basic Appl Ecol, 11:76-82.
DUKAS, R. 2005. Bumble bee predators reduce pollinators density. Ecology, 86:1401-1406.
DUKAS, R. & DH MORSE. 2005. Crab spiders show mixed effects on flower-visiting bees and no effect on plant fitness components. Ecoscience, 12:244-247.
EBELING, A; A KLEIN; J SCHUMACHER; W WEISSER & T TSCHARNTKE. 2008. How does plant richness affect pollinator richness and temporal stability of flower visits? Oikos, 117:1808-1815.
HARE, JD & E ELLE. 2002. Variable impact of diverse insect herbivores on dimorphic Datura wrightii. Ecology, 83:2711-2720.
HIGGINSON, AD; GD RUXTON & J SKELHORN. 2010. The impact of flower-dwelling predators on host plant reproductive success. Oecologia, 164:411-421.
JANZEN, D. 1991. Historia Natural de Costa Rica. Editorial de la Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
JONES, E & A. DORNHAUS. 2011. Predation risk makes bees reject rewarding flowers and reduce foraging activity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 65:1505-1511.
KUNIN, WE. 1992. Density and reproductive success in wild populations of Diplotaxis erucoides (Brassicaceae). Oecologia, 91:129-133.
LOUDA, SM. 1982. Inflorescence Spiders: A Cost / Benefit Analysis for the Host Plant , Haplopappus venetus Blake (Asteraceae). Oecologia, 55:185-191.
MORAIS-FILHO, JC & GQ ROMERO. 2008. Microhabitat use by Peucetia flava (Oxyopidae) on the glandular plant Rhyncanthera dichotoma (Melastomataceae). J Arachnol, 36:374-378.
MORAIS-FILHO, J.C. & G.Q. ROMERO. 2010. Plant glandular trichomes mediate protective mutualism in a spider-plant system. Ecol Entomol, 35:485-494.
MUNGUÍA-ROSAS, M.; V. PARRA-TABLA; J. OLLERTON & J.C. CERVERA. 2012. Environmental control of reproductive phenology and the effect of pollen supplementation on resource allocation in the cleistogamous weed, Ruellia nudiflora (Acanthaceae). Ann Bot, 109:343-50.
NYFFELER, M; DA DEAN & WL STERLING. 1992. Diets, feeding specialization, and predatory role of two lynx spiders, Oxyopes salticus and Peucetia viridans (Araneae: Oxyopidae) in a Texas cotton agroecosystem. Environ Entomol, 21:1457-1465.
ORTEGÓN-CAMPOS, I; L ABDALA-ROBERTS; V PARRA-TABLA; JC CERVERA; D MARRUFO-ZAPATA & CM HERRERA. 2012. Influence of multiple factors on plant local adaptation: soil type and folivore effects in Ruellia nudiflora (Acanthaceae). Evol Ecol, 26:545-558.
OXFORD, GS & RG GILLESPIE. 1998. Evolution and ecology of spider coloration. Annu Rev Entomol, 43: 619-643.
ROMERO, GQ; P ANTIQUEIRA & J KORICHEVA. 2011. A meta-analysis of predation risk effects on pollinator behaviour. PloS one, 6: e20689.
ROMERO, GQ; JC SOUZA & J. VASCONCELLOS-NETO. 2008. Anti- herbivore protection by mutualistic spiders and the role of plant glandular trichomes. Ecology, 89:3105–3115.
STANG, M; PGL KLINKHAMER & E VAN DER MEIJDEN. 2006. Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant-flower visitor web. Oikos, 112:111–121.
STEVENS, M & S MERILAITA. 2009. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Philos T Roy Soc B, 364: 423–427.
VASCONCELLOS-NETO, J. 2006. Associations of spiders of the genus Peucetia (Oxyopidae) with plants bearing glandular hairs. Biotropica, 39:221-226.
WILLEY, MB & PH ADLER. 1989. Biology of Peucetia viridans (Araneae, Oxyopidae) in south Carolina, with special reference to predation and maternal care. J Arachnol, 17:275-284.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Mariana Tadey, Roger Ayazo, Farah Carrasco-Rueda, Yuliana Christopher, Marisol Domínguez, Giomara La Quay-Velázquez, Miriam San José
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.