Evaluation of an ant sampling protocol (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in three modified environments located inside an  austral Atlantic Forest area of Brazil

Junir Antonio Lutinski; Cladis Juliana Lutinski; Samanta Iop; Flávio Roberto Mello Garcia

doi:10.25260/EA.13.23.1.0.1190

Authors

Junir Antonio Lutinski Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Cladis Juliana Lutinski Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Lab. de Biologia
Samanta Iop Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Flávio Roberto Mello Garcia Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL), Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia e Genética, Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.13.23.1.0.1190

Keywords:

bait, composition, conservation planning, diversity, richness

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficiency as a tool for ant survey of a sampling protocol composed of six methods, and examined the role of environmental features on the efficiency of methods complementarity . We applied them in three environments (pine, eucalyptus and native forest) in the National Forest of Chapecó and the effect of the characteristics of these environments on methods complementarity. The sampling methods were pitfall traps, two types of bait (sardines and glucose), sweep net, entomological umbrella and Malaise trap. The protocol efficiency of the protocol in the ant inventory was evaluated based on rarefaction curves, richness estimators and records of occurrence of ants. The protocol captured the greatest richness on native forest environment (S = 95), followed by the eucalyptus plantation (S = 81) and pine forest (S=78). Pitfall trap, sardine baits, Malaise trap and sweep net contributed with unique records in the three environments, while the glucose baits contributed with unique records in the eucalyptus plantation and native forest, and entomological umbrella only in eucalyptus environment. The results highlighted the importance of using complementary techniques for the ant fauna inventory irrespective of the environment complexity. Contrary to our prediction, the greater environmental complexity of the native forest with respect to the other environments was not associated to lower efficiency of using single technique.

References

AGOSTI, D & LE ALONSO. 2000. The ALL protocol: selected case studies. Pp.204-206 in: D AGOSTI; JD MAJER; LE ALONSO & TR SCHULTZ, (eds). Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution. Washington. 280 pp.

ALBUQUERQUE, EZ & E DIEHL. 2009. Análise faunística das formigas epígeas (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) em campo nativo no Planalto das Araucárias, Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 53:398-403.

ANDERSEN, AN. 1991. Responses of ground-foraging ant communities to three experimental fire regimes in savanna Forest of tropical Australia. Biotropica, 23: 575-585.

ANJOS, O; A ARNHOLD; GVV CORRÊA & K STUMPF. 2008. Árvores e Formigas Cortadeiras (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) em Viçosa, Minas Gerais. Revista Trópica – Ciências Agrárias e Biológicas, 2:16-22.

ARCILA, AM & FH LOZANO-ZAMBRANO. 2003. Hormigas como herramienta para la bioindicación y monitoreo. Pp. 159-166 in: F FERNÁNDEZ (ed.) Introducción a las hormigas de la región neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Bogotá, Colombia. 424 pp.

BALEN, CA; VT PERIN & FRM GARCIA. 2011. Caracterização da visitação na Floresta Nacional de Chapecó e proposição de um programa de uso público. Pp. 15-32 in: FRM GARCIA, JA LUTINSKi & CJ LUTINSKI (orgs). Biodiversidade da Floresta Nacional de Chapecó. Baraúna. São Paulo. 543 pp.

BESTELMEYER, BT; D AGOSTI; LE ALONSO; CRF BRANDÃO; WL BROWN JR; JHC DELABIE & R SILVESTRE. 2000. Field techniques for the study of ground-dwelling ants. Pp. 122-144 in: D AGOSTI; JD MAJER; LE ALONSO & TR SCHULTZ, (eds). Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution. Washington. 280 pp.

BOLTON, B. 2003. Synopsis and classification of Formicidae. Am. Entomol. Inst. Gainesville, Florida. 370 pp. CAETANO, AC. 2011. Histórico. Pp. 7-13 in: FRM GARCIA; JA LUTINSKi & CJ LUTINSKI (orgs). Biodiversidade da Floresta Nacional de Chapecó. Baraúna. São Paulo. 543 pp.

CALIXTO, AA; MK HARRIS & A DEAN. 2007. Sampling ants with traps using either propylene glycol or water as a preservative. Southwestern Entomologists 32:87-91.

CAMPOS, RI; CT LOPES; WCS MAGALHÃES & HL VASCONCELOS. 2008. Estratificação vertical de formigas em cerrado strictu sensu no Parque Estadual da Serra de Caldas Novas, Goiás, Brasil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 98:311-316.

COLLI, GR; RP BASTOS & AFB ARAÚJO. 2002. The character and dynamics of the Cerrado herpetofauna. Pp. 223- 241 in: PS OLIVEIRA & RJ MARQUIS (eds). The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna. Columbia University Press, New York.

COLWELL, RK. 2006. EstimateS: Staistical Estimation of Species Richness and Share Species from Simples (Software and User’s Guide), Version 8. http://viceroy.eeb.ucon.edu/estimates. (last accessed 30/10/2011).

FERNÁNDEZ, F. 2003. Introducción a las hormigas de la región neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Bogotá, Colombia. 424 pp.

FRANZEL, C & AG FARJI-BRENER. 2000. ¿Oportunistas o selectivas? Plasticidad en la dieta de la hormiga cortadora de hojas Acromyrmex lobicornis en el noroeste de la Patagonia. Ecología Austral, 10: 159-168.

GALINDO-LEAL, C & IG CÂMARA. 2003. The Atlantic Forest of South America. Biodiversity Status, Threats, and Outlook. Island Press. Washington DC. 488 pp.

GARCIA, FRM. 2008. Zoologia agrícola: manejo ecológico de pragas. 3a ed. Rígel. Porto Alegre, Brasil. 256 pp.

GOTELLI, NJ & RK COLWELL. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Letters, 4:379-391.

GOTELLI, NJ; AM ELLISON; RR DUNN & NJ SANDERS. 2012. Counting ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): biodiversity sampling and statistical analysis for myrmecologists. Myrmecological News, 15:13-19.

Gotelli, NJ & GL Entsminger. 2001. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 7.0. Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear. http://homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm.

HAHN, DH & DE WHEELER. 2002. Seasonal foraging activity and bait preference of ants on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biotropica, 34:348-356.

HÖLLDOBLER, B & EO WILSON. 1990. The ants. Cambridge: Belknap, Harvard University Press, 732p.

JOHNSON, PJ; R ROUGHLEY; DA POLLOCK & A SOLÍS. 2012. Biodiversity sampling for Coleoptera in Costa Rica: a parataxonomist’s manual for collecting, rearing and preparing beetles. Available at http://www.inbio.ac.cr/papers/manual_coleoptera/manual.htm. (last accessed 19/12/2012)

KING, JR & SD PORTER. 2005: Evaluation of sampling methods and species richness estimators for ants in upland ecosystems in Florida. Environmental Entomology, 34:1566-1578.

LONGINO, JT; J CODDINGTON & RK COLWELL. 2002. The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology, 83:689-702.

LONGINO, JT & RK COLWELL. 1997. Biodiversity assessment using structured inventory: Capturing the ant fauna of a tropical rain forest. Ecol. Applic., 7:1263-1277.

LOPES, CT & HL VASCONCELOS. 2008. Evaluation of three methods for sampling ground-dwelling Ants in the Brazilian Cerrado. Neotrop. Entomol., 37:399-405.

LUTINSKI, JA & FRM GARCIA. 2005. Análise faunística de Formicidae (Hymenoptera: Apocrita) em ecossistema degradado no município de Chapecó, Santa Catarina. Biotemas, 18:73-86.

LUTINSKI, JA; FRM GARCIA; CJ LUTINSKI & S IOP. 2008. Diversidade de formigas na Floresta Nacional de Chapecó, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Ciência Rural, 38: 1810–1816.

LUTINSKI, JA; CJ LUTINSKI; S IOP & FRM GARCIA. 2011. Formigas. [Chapter 9] Pp. 277-321 in: FRM GARCIA; JA LUTINSKi & CJ LUTINSKI (orgs). Biodiversidade da Floresta Nacional de Chapecó. Baraúna. São Paulo. 543 pp.

MAJER, JD. 1997. The use of traps for sampling ants – a critique. Memoirs of the Museum of Victory, 56:323-329.

MELO, AS. 2004. A critique of the use of jackknife and related non-parametric techniques to estimate species richness. Comm. Ecology, 5: 149-157.

MELO, AS; RAS PEREIRA; AJ SANTOS; GJ SHEPHERD; G MACHADO; HF MEDEIROS & RJ SAWAYA. 2003. Comparing species richness among assemblages using sample units: why not use extrapolation methods to standardize different sample sizes? Oikos, 101:398-410.

OLSON, DM. 1991. A comparison of the efficacy of litter sifting and traps for sampling leaf litter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a tropical wet forest, Costa Rica. Biotropica, 23:166-172.

OSBORN, F; W GOITIA; M CABRERA & K JAFFÉ. 1999. Ants, plants and butterflies as diversity indicators: Comparisons between at six forest sites in Venezuela. Studies Neotrop. Fauna and Environ., 34:59-64.

PARR, CL & SL CHOWN. 2001. Inventory and bioindicator sampling: Testing and Winkler methods with ants in South African savanna. J. Insect Conserv., 5:27-36.

RIBAS, CR; JH SCHOEREDER; M PIE & SM SOARES. 2003. Tree heterogeneity, resource availability, and larger scale processes regulating arboreal ant species richness. Austral Ecol., 28:305-314.

ROMERO, H & K JAFFÉ. 1989. A comparison of methods for sampling ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in savannas. Biotropica, 21:348–352.

SARMIENTO, CE. 2003. Metodologías de captura y estudio de las hormigas. Hormigas como herramienta para la bioindicación y monitoreo. [Chapter 12] Pp. 201-210 in: F FERNÁNDEZ (ed.). Introducción a las hormigas de la región neotropical. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. 424 pp.

SILVA, RR & CRF BRANDÃO. 1999. Formigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) como indicadores da qualidade ambiental e da biodiversidade de outros invertebrados terrestres. Biotemas, 12:55-73.

SILVESTRE, R & RR SILVA. 2001. Guildas de formigas da Estação Ecológica Jataí, Luis Antônio – SP – sugestões para aplicação de guildas como bioindicadores ambientais. Biotemas, 14:37-69.

SOCARRÁS, A. 1998. Agricultura orgânica. Associacción Cubana de técnicos Agrícolas e Forestales, Cuba. 121pp.

TAVARES, AA; PC BISPO & AC ZANZINI. 2008: Effect of collect time on communities of epigaeic ants (Hymenoptera : Formicidae) in areas of Eucalyptus cloeziana and cerrado. Neotrop. Entomol., 37:126-130.

ULYSSÉA, MA; CE CERETO; FB ROSUMEK; RR SILVA & BC LOPES. 2011. Updated list of ant species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) recorded in Santa Catarina State, southern Brazil, with a discussion of research advances and priorities. Rev. Bras. Entomol., 55:603–611.

WANG, CL; J STRAZANAC & L BUTLER. 2001: A comparison of traps with bait traps for studying leaf litter ant communities. J. of Econ. Entomol., 94:761-765.