Shrub packs and irrigation to rehabilitate semiarid regions disturbed by the laying of pipelines

Authors

  • Esteban Kowaljow Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV). CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
  • César M. Rostagno Centro Nacional Patagónico (CENPAT). CONICET

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.13.23.1.0.1193

Keywords:

compaction, vegetation establishment, gas pipeline, brushpacks, Patagonia, soil properties

Abstract

The installation of underground pipelines generally requires the removal of the vegetation cover and has the potential, along with the heavy traffic associated with the installation, to affect the soil quality. In this study we assessed the effect of application of “quilembai” (Chuquiraga avellanedae Lorentz) branches on selected soil properties and vegetation recovery in two sites disturbed by the installation of a pipeline: i) an area where the vegetation and topsoil were removed and affected by heavy machinery traffic (Zone 1), and ii) an area where the vegetation and topsoil were removed and, after the pipeline was installed, they were redistributed over the disturbed area (Zone 2). Branches were applied at two application rates, without or with irrigation. There was also an irrigation treatment and a control. Ten months after the treatments were applied, soil water content, bulk density penetration resistance, infiltration rate, soil organic C and Olsen-P were determined. The density of plants in each plot was determined at the beginning and 10-months post treatment application. The treatment application increased soil water content, although with a varying effect among zones and we did not detect treatment effects on other soil variables. Plant density, mainly that of Nassella tenuis (Phil.) Barkworth, increased in all the treatments with branches of the zone 1, with positive effects of application rates as well as irrigation, while zone 2 did not reveal effects of treatments. Although in 10-months post-application the quilembai branches and irrigation had no significant effects on the soil physical and chemical properties, they increased plant establishment, accelerating the pace of vegetation recovery.

References

AUSTIN, AT; L YAHDJIAN; JM STARK; J BELNAP; A PORPORATO; ET AL. 2004. Water pulses and biogeochemical cycles in arid and semiarid ecosystems. Oecologia, 141:221-235.

BAINBRIDGE, DA. 2007. A guide for desert and dryland restoration: a new hope for arid lands. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA. Pp. 347.

BARROS, V & MM RIVERO. 1982. Mapas de probabilidad de precipitación de la provincia del Chubut. Contribución número 54, Centro Nacional Patagónico, Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina. Pp. 25.

BEESKOW, AM; HF DEL VALLE & CM ROSTAGNO. 1987. Los sistemas fisiográficos de la región árida y semiárida de la provincia de Chubut. Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Delegación Regional Patagonia. S. C. Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina. Pp. 168.

BERTRAND, AR. 1965. Rate of Water Intake in the fiel. Pp. 197-209 en: Black, CA (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Winsconsin, USA.

BLAKE, B. 1965. Bulk density. Pp. 374-390 en: Black, CA (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Winsconsin, USA.

CABRERA, AL. 1953. Esquema fitogeográfico de la República Argentina. Revista del Museo de La Plata, Botánica, 8: 87-168.

CI, L & X YANG. 2010. Desertification and its control en China. Higher Education Press, Beijing. Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York. Pp. 507.

CORTINA, J; FT MAESTRE; R VALLEJO; MJ BAEZA, A VALDECANTOS; ET AL. 2006. Ecosystem structure, function, and restoration success: Are they related? J. Nat. Conserv., 14:152-160.

DAVIDSON, DT. 1965. Penetrometer Measurements. Pp. 472-484 en: Black, CA (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Winsconsin, USA.

DORMAAR, JF & WD WILLMS. 1992. Water-extractable organic matter from plant litter and soil of rough fescue grassland. J. Range Management, 45:152-158.

GREEN, DR. 1989. Rangeland restoration projects in western New South Wales. Aust. Rang. J., 11:110-116.

ELDRIDGE, DJ & RSB GREEN. 1994. Microbiotic soil crusts - a review of their roles in soil and ecological processes in the rangelands of Australia. Aust. J. Soil Res., 32: 389-415.

HANKE, W; A GRÖNGRÖFT; N JÜRGENS & U SCHMIEDEL. 2011. Rehabilitation of arid rangelands: intensifying water pulses from low-intensity winter rainfall. J. Arid Environ., 75:185-193.

KOWALJOW, E & CM ROSTAGNO. 2008. Efectos de la instalación de un gasoducto sobre algunas propiedades del suelo superficial y la cobertura vegetal en el NE de Chubut. Ciencia del Suelo, 26:51-62.

KOWALJOW, E & MJ MAZZARINO. 2007. Soil restoration in semiarid Patagonia: Chemical and biological response to different compost quality. Soil Biol. Biochem., 39:1580-1588.

LUDWIG, JA & DJ TONGWAY. 1996. Rehabilitation of Semiarid Landscapes in Australia. II. Restoring Vegetation Patches. Restor. Ecol., 4:398-406.

MAESTRE, FT & J CORTINA. 2004. Insights into ecosystem composition and function in a sequence of degraded semiarid steppes. Restor. Ecol., 12:494-502.

MAESTRE, FT; J CORTINA & R VALLEJO. 2006. Are Ecosystem Composition, Structure, and Functional Status Related to Restoration Success? A Test from Semiarid Mediterranean Steppes. Restor. Ecol., 14:258-266.

MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D & H ELLENBERG (eds.). 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York, USA.

NELSON, DW & LE SOMMERS. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Pp. 539-579 en: Page, AL (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. 2da ed. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Winsconsin, USA.

NOY-MEIR, I. 1973. Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 4:25-52.

OLSEN, SR & LE SOMMERS. 1982. Phosphorus. Pp. 403-430 en: Page, AL (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. 2da ed. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Winsconsin, USA.

PRESSLAND, AJ & TWG GRAHAM. 1989. Approaches to the restoration of rangelands-the Queensland experience. Aust. Rang. J., 11:101-109.

ROSTAGNO, CM & HF DEL VALLE. 1988. Mounds associated with shrubs in aridic soils of north-eastern Patagonia: Characteristics and probable genesis. Catena, 15:347- 359.

ROSTAGNO, CM; HF DEL VALLE & L VIDELA. 1991. The influence of shrubs on some chemical and physical properties of an aridic soil in north-eastern Patagonia, Argentina. J. Arid Environ., 20:179-188.

SIMONS, L & N ALLSOPP. 2007. Rehabilitation of Rangelands in Paulshoek, Namaqualand: Understanding vegetation change using biophysical manipulations. J. Arid Environ., 70:755-766.

STATSOFT. 1984–2003. Statistica Release 6.1. StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, USA.

STEEL, R & J TORRIE. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.

TONGWAY, DJ & JA LUDWIG. 1996. Rehabilitation of Semiarid Landscapes in Australia. I. Restoring Productive Soil Patches. Restor. Ecol., 4:388-397.

VALENTIN, C; JM D’HERBES & J POESEN. 1999. Soil and water components of banded vegetation patterns. Catena, 37: 1-24.

WILLMS, WD; S SMOLIAK & AW BAFLEY. 1986. Herbage production following litter removal on Alberta native grasslands. J. Range Manage., 39:536-540.

YÜKSEK, T & F YÜKSEK. 2011. The effects of restoration on soil properties in degraded land in the semi-arid region of Turkey. Catena, 84:47-53.

Published

2013-04-01

How to Cite

Kowaljow, E., & Rostagno, C. M. (2013). Shrub packs and irrigation to rehabilitate semiarid regions disturbed by the laying of pipelines. Ecología Austral, 23(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.13.23.1.0.1193

Issue

Section

Short Communications