Spatial clustering of twig-nesting ants corresponds with metacommunity assembly processes

Authors

  • George Livingston Facultad de Agronomía. Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Doug Jackson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.14.24.3.0.12

Abstract

Ecología Austral, 24:343-349 (2014)

The metacommunity concept and associated models are poorly integrated with the field of landscape ecology. One way to promote synthesis is to identify situations in which specific metacommunity models correspond to specific and explicit spatial patterns in the distribution of communities across space. We explore this possible link using mapped communities of twig-nesting ants on coffee plants from a plantation in southern Mexico. Previous work has shown species sorting to predominate among common species and mass effects among rare species. We test whether differential patterns of spatial clustering among dominant and subdominant ant species correspond to a species sorting and mass effects model, respectively. We find significant clustering among subdominant species in two of six sites and no clustering among dominants. At the species level, significant clustering was observed in 23% of cases. These results partially support our hypothesis and may be explained mechanistically by the interstitial hypothesis, whereby rare species persist in “gaps” among dominants. At the spatial scales we examined, we found no support for the ant-mosaic. Our results suggest further study linking metacommunity models to specific and explicit spatial patterns may yield insights on pattern and process relationships in landscapes.

References

ARNAN, X; C GAUCHEREL & AN ANDERSEN. 2011. Dominance and species co-occurrence in highly diverse ant communities: a test of the interstitial hypothesis and discovery of a three-tiered competition cascade. Oecologia, 166:783-794.

BISWAS, S & H WAGNER. 2012. Landscape contrast: a solution to hidden assumptions in the metacommunity concept? Landscape Ecol., 27:621-631.

COTTENIE, K. 2005. Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol. Lett., 8:1175-1182.

DINIZ-FILHO, JAF; T SIQUEIRA; AA PADIAL; TF RANGEL; VL LANDEIRO; ET AL. 2012. Spatial autocorrelation analysis allows disentangling the balance between neutral and niche processes in metacommunities. Oikos, 121:201-210.

FERNÁNDEZ, F. 2003. Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical .Institute de Investigacion de Recursos Biologicos Alexander von Humboldt. Bogotá, Colombia.

GOREAUD, F & R PÉLISSIER. 1999. On explicit formulas of edge effect correction for Ripley’s K-function. J.Veg. Sci., 10:433-438.

GOVE, AD, & JD MAJER. 2006. Do isolated trees encourage arboreal ant foraging at ground-level? Quantification of ant activity and the influence of season, in Veracruz, Mexico.Agric. Ecosys. Environ., 113:272-276.

HAASE, P. 1995. Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley’s K-function: Introduction and methods of edge correction. J. Veg. Sci., 6:575-582.

HOLYOAK, M; MA LEIBOLD & RD HOLT. 2005. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, USA.

KAUTZ, S. 2009. Acacia-inhabiting Pseudomyrmex ants-Integrating physiological, behavioral, chemical and genetic data to understand the maintenance of ant-plant mutualisms. Ph.D. Thesis. Universität Duisburg-Essen, Germany.

KAUTZ, S; DJ BALLHORN; J KROISS; SU PAULS & CS MOREAU. 2012. Host plant use by competing acacia-ants: mutualists monopolize while parasites share hosts. PloS ONE, 7:e37691.

LARSEN, A & SM PHILPOTT. 2010. Twig-nesting ants: the hidden predators of the coffee berry borer in Chiapas, Mexico. Biotropica, 42:342-347.

LEIBOLD, M; M HOLYOAK; N MOUQUET; P AMARASEKARE; JM CHASE; ET AL. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett., 7:601-613.

LESTON, D. 1978. A Neotropical ant mosaic. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am.,71:649-653.

LIVINGSTON, GF & SM PHILPOTT. 2010. A metacommmunity approach to co-occurrence patterns and the core-satellite hypothesis in a community of tropical arboreal ants. Ecol. Res., 25:1129-1140.

LIVINGSTON, G; SM PHILPOTT & A DE LA MORA RODRIGUEZ. 2012. Do species sorting and mass effects drive assembly in tropical agroecological landscape mosaics? Biotropica, 45:10-17.

LOGUE, JB; N MOUQUET; H PETER & H HILLEBRAND. 2011. Empirical approaches to metacommunities: a review and comparison with theory. Trends Ecol. Evol., 26:482-491.

LONGINO, J. 2007. Ants of Costa Rica. Available at http://academic.evergreen.edu/projects/ants/AntsofCostaRica.html (accessed 15 May 2009).

MAJER, JD. 1972. The ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms. Bull. Entomol. Res., 62:151-160.

MAJER, JD; JHC DELABIE & MRB SMITH. 1994. Arboreal ant community patterns in Brazilian cocoa farms. Biotropica, 26:73-83.

MCGLYNN, TP; RM FAWCETT & DA CLARK. 2009. Litter biomass and nutrient determinants of ant density, nest size, and growth in a Costa Rican tropical wet forest. Biotropica, 41:234-240.

MOGUEL, P & VM TOLEDO. 1999. Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Cons. Biol., 13:11-21.

DE LA MORA, A; G LIVINGSTON & SM PHILPOTT. 2008. Arboreal ant abundance and leaf miner damage in coffee agroecosystems in Mexico. Biotropica, 40:742-746.

MOUQUET, N & M. LOREAU. 2002. Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am. Nat., 159:420-426.

PERFECTO, I & J VANDERMEER. 2008. Spatial pattern and ecological process in the coffee agroforestry system. Ecology, 89:915-920.

PHILPOTT, SM & PF FOSTER. 2005. Nest-site limitation in coffee agroecosystems: artificial nests maintain diversity of arboreal ants. Ecol. Appl., 15:1478-1485.

R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available at http://www.R-project.org/accessed 10 August 2012).

RIBAS, CR & JH SCHOEREDER. 2002. Are all ant mosaics caused by competition? Oecologia, 131:606-611.

RIETKERK, M & J VAN DE KOPPEL. 2008. Regular pattern formation in real ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol., 23:169-175.

SAGATA, K & PJ LESTER. 2009. Behavioural plasticity associated with propagule size, resources, and the invasion success of the Argentine ant Linepithema humile. J. Appl. Ecol., 46:19-27.

SANDERS, NJ; GM CRUTSINGER; RR DUNN; JD MAJER & JHC DELABIE. 2007. An ant mosaic revisited: dominant ant species disassemble arboreal ant communities but co‐occur randomly. Biotropica, 39:422-427.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-01

How to Cite

Livingston, G., & Jackson, D. (2014). Spatial clustering of twig-nesting ants corresponds with metacommunity assembly processes. Ecología Austral, 24(3), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.14.24.3.0.12

Issue

Section

Short Communications