Demographic response to the manipulation of adult females in corn mouse populations
Keywords:
adult female removal, Calomys musculinus, population growth, recruitment, survivalAbstract
Variation in population abundance is a consequence of changes in demographic parameters such as survival and recruitment. These demographic parameters can be affected by intraspecific competition, thus adults may play an important role influencing the survival and/or reproduction of juvenile individuals in many species of small mammals. We present an analysis of Calomys musculinus populations using capture-mark-recapture models in order to evaluate the effect of female removal on their demography. The study was carried out in four enclosures during two different periods: a reference period and a treatment period, with the removal of adult females. Reference period was analyzed to describe population demography without manipulations. In treatment period, two control enclosures maintained both parents remained with their offspring whereas other two enclosures had their adult females removed. Seven monthly trapping sessions were carried out (spring to autumn). We estimated apparent survival, recruitment, population growth rates and recapture probabilities. Models considered these parameters constrained to vary as a function of time, enclosure, sex and/or treatment. During the reference period survival and recruitment showed sex and time effects, survival was higher in females and decreased towards June; recruitment showed a peak in February with a higher number of recruited males; population growth rates peaked in February and decreased towards June. During the treatment period survival showed time effect whereas recruitment showed time and treatment effects. Survival was higher at the beginning of the breeding period and decreased afterwards, and recruitment was higher in control enclosures; population growth rates showed a similar pattern than in reference period. There were not differences in growth rates and abundances between control and experimental enclosures. Under our experimental and methodological conditions, the results would indicate that the absence of females in experimental enclosures was not enough to cause a clear impact on final population size.
References
BOND, ML & JO WOLFF. 1999. Does access to females or competition among males limit male home-ranges in a promiscuous rodent? J. Mammal., 80:1243-1250.
BURNHAM, K & D ANDERSON. 1998. Model selection and inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
BUSCH, M; MH MIÑO; JR DADON & K HODARA. 2000. Habitat selection by Calomys musculinus (Muridae, Sigmodontinae) in crop areas of the Pampean region, Argentina. Ecología Austral, 10:15-26.
CHOQUET, R; AM REBOULET; R PRADEL; O GIMENEZ & J-D LEBRETON. 2003. User ́s Manual for U-CARE, Version 2.0.
CODA, J; J PRIOTTO & A STEINMANN. 2011. Behavioral counter- strategies to infanticide in corn mouse females, Calomys musculinus. Mastozoología Neotropical, 18(2):207-215.
CRESPIN, L; R VERHAGEN; N STENSETH; N YOCCOZ; AC PRE ́VOT- JULLIARD; ET AL. 2002. Survival in fluctuating bank vole populations: seasonal and yearly variations. Oikos, 98:467-479.
CRESPIN, L & M LIMA. 2006. Supervivencia adulta y dinámica poblacional del lauchón orejudo Phyllotis darwini en Chile central. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat., 79:295-308.
DE VILLAFAÑE, G & SM BONAVENTURA. 1987. Ecological studies in crop fi elds of the endemic area of Argentine hemorrhagic fever. Calomys musculinus movements in relation to habitat and abundance. Mammalia, 51:233-248.
DOBSON, F & M OLI. 2001. The demographic basis of population regulation in Columbian ground squirrels. Am. Nat., 158:236-247.
ECCARD, J; I KLEMME; T HORNE & H YLONEN. 2002. Effects of competition and season on survival and maturation of young bank vole females. Evol. Ecol., 16:85-99.
GUREVITCH, J; L MORROW; A WALLACE & J WALSH. 1992. A meta-analysis of fi eld experiments on competition. Am. Nat., 140:539-572.
LEBRETON, J-D; K BURNHAM; J CLOBERT & D ANDERSON. 1992. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unifi ed approach with case studies. Ecol. Monogr., 62:67-118.
LIMA, M; JE KEYMER & F JAKSIC. 1999. ENSO-driven rainfall variability and delayed density dependence cause rodent outbreaks in western South America: linking demography and population dynamics. Am. Nat., 153:476-491.
LIMA, M; R JULLIARD; N STENSETH & F JAKSIC. 2001. Demographic dynamics of a neotropical small rodent (Phyllotis darwini): feedback structure, predation and climatic factors. J. Anim. Ecol., 70:761-775.
LIMA M, N STENSETH, H LEIRS & F JAKSIC. 2003. Population dynamics of small mammals in semi-arid regions: a comparative study of demographic variability in two rodent species. Proce. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270:1997-2007.
MILLS, JN & JE CHILDS. 1998. Ecologic studies of rodent reservoirs: their relevance for human health. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 4:529-537.
NICHOLS, JD; JA HINES; J-D LEBRETON & R PRADEL. 2000. The relative contributions of demographic components to population growth: a direct estimation approach based on reverse-time capture-recapture. Ecology, 81:3362-3376.
OZGUL, A; M OLI; L OLSON; L BLUMSTEIN; D BLUMSTEIN & K ARMITAGE. 2007. Spatiotemporal variation in reproductive parameters of yellow-bellied marmots. Oecologia, 154:95-116.
POCOCK, M; SEARLE J & P WHITE P. 2004. Adaptations of animals to commensal habitats: population dynamics of house mice Mus musculus domesticus on farms. J. Anim. Ecol., 73: 878-888.
POLOP, JJ & O SUÁREZ. 2010. Ecología de poblaciones de roedores Sigmodontinos de la zona central de Argentina. Pp. 289-324 in: Polop, JJ & M Busch (eds.). Biología y Ecología de pequeños roedores en la región Pampeana de Argentina. Editorial Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Córdoba, Argentina.
PRADEL, R. 1996. Utilization of capture-mark-recapture for the study of recruitment and population growth rate. Biometrics, 52:703-709.
PRIOTTO, J; D GÓMEZ & J POLOP. 2010. A demographic analysis of population responses to the manipulation of adult males in Calomys venustus (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae). Ecol. Res., 25:521-529.
PUSENIUS, J & J VIITALA. 1993. Varying spacing behaviour of breeding fi eld voles, Microtus agrestis. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 30:143-152.
SIMONE, I; F CAGNACCI; C PROVENSAL & J POLOP. 2010. Environmental determinants of the small mammal assemblage in an agroecosystem of central Argentina: The role of Calomys musculinus. Mamm. Biol., 75:496-509.
SOMMARO, L; D GÓMEZ; F BONATTO; A STEINMANN; M CHIAPPERO; ET AL. 2010a. Corn mice (Calomys musculinus) movement in linear habitats of agricultural ecosystems. J. Mammal., 91(3):668-673.
SOMMARO, L; A STEINMANN; M CHIAPPERO & J PRIOTTO. 2010b. Effect of high density on the short term Calomys musculinus spacing behaviour: A fencing experiment. Acta Oecol., 36:343-348.
STEINMANN, A; J PRIOTTO; E CASTILLO & J POLOP. 2005. Size and overlap of home range in Calomys musculinus (Muridae: Sigmodontinae). Acta Theriol., 50:197-206.
STEINMANN, AR; J PRIOTTO; L SOMMARO & J POLOP. 2006. The infl uence of adult female absence on the spacing behaviour of juvenile corn mice, Calomys musculinus: a removal experiment. Ann. Zool. Fennici, 43:366-372.
STEINMANN, A; J PRIOTTO & J POLOP. 2009. Territorial behaviour in corn mice, Calomys musculinus (Muridae: Sigmodontinae), with regard to mating system. J. Ethol., 27:51-58.
TELFER, S; M BENNETT; K BOWN; R CAVANAGH; L CRESPIN; ET AL. 2002. Effects of cowpox virus on survival in natural rodent populations: increases and decreases. J. Anim. Ecol., 71:558-568.
WHITE, GC & KP BURNHAM. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study, 46:S120-A139.
WHITE, GC; DR ANDERSON; KP BURNHAM & DL OTIS. 1982. Capture-recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations. Report Los Alamos. Los Alamos National Laboratory.
WOLFF, JO. 1992. Parents suppress reproduction and stimulate dispersal in opposite sex juvenile white-footed mice. Nature, 359:409-410.
WOLFF, JO; DW EDGE & G WANG. 2002. Effect of adult sex ratios on recruitment of juvenile gray-tailed voles, Microtus canicaudus. J. Mammal., 83:947-956.
WOLFF, JO & DW MACDONALD. 2004. Promiscuous females protect their offspring. Trends Ecol. Evol., 19:127-134.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 María D. Gómez, Andrea R. Steinmann, José W. Priotto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.
