What is habitat? Ambiguity in the use of technical jargon

Authors

  • Mario S. Di Bitetti CONICET, Instituto de Biología Subtropical, sede Iguazú, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Nacional de Misiones; Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico (CeIBA).

Keywords:

communication, environment, ecological jargon, habitat definition, scientific terminology

Abstract

Scientific and technical language may lead to confusion if the meaning of the terms used is not clear to the audience. The term habitat is part of the ecologists’ jargon, and several authors have highlighted its ambiguous or confusing use in scientific publications. I conducted a poll among ecologists and other environmental scientists to know what is the meaning that they assign to the term habitat. I compared the results from this poll with the meaning that ecologists and other environmental scientists assigned to this word in research articles published in Ecología Austral. Most ecologists and environmental scientists considered that there is only one proper definition of habitat: “The habitat of an organism is the place where it lives, or the place where one should look for it”. However, the most frequent use of this term in the analyzed research articles was as a synonym for “environment”, a definition rarely selected by the professionals surveyed. Because there is more than one definition for the term habitat, and some of them are imposed by customary use, its meaning has to be interpreted by contextual clues. The best way to avoid confusion in the use of technical jargon is to define its meaning at the onset of a publication and to use it consistently throughout the text.

References

ADAMS, DC; MS DI BITETTI; CH JANSON; LB SLOBODKIN & N VALENZUELA. 1997. An “audience effect” for ecological terminology: use and misuse of jargon. Oikos, 80:632-636.

BISCAYART, C & MI DE TORRES CURTH. 2009. La programación dinámica en el estudio de procesos de migración. Ecología Austral, 19:93-105.

BLOCK, WM & LA BRENNAN. 1993. The habitat concept in ornithology: theory and applications. Pp. 35-91 en: Power, DM (ed.). Current ornithology. Vol. 11. Plenum Press, NewYork, N.Y.

CABRÉ CASTELLVÍ, MT. 2003. Theories of terminology: Their description, prescription and explanation. Terminology, 9:163-199.

FREEMAN, GH & JH HALTON. 1951. Note on an exact treatment of contingency, goodness of fi t and other problems of signifi cance. Biometrika, 38:141-149.

GRIMM, V & C WISSEL. 1997. Babel, or the ecological stability discussions: an inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusion. Oecologia, 109:323-334.

HALL, LS; PR KRAUSMAN & ML MORRIS. 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Soc. B., 25:173-182.

HUNTER, ML. 2002. Fundamentals of Conservation Biology. Second Edition. Blackwell Publishing.

HUNTER, ML & JP GIBBS. 2007. Fundamentals of Conservation Biology. Third Edition. Blackwell Publishing.

HUTCHINSON, GE. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22:415-427.

JAKSIĆ, FM. 1981. Abuse and misuse of the term ‘’guild’’ in ecological studies. Oikos, 37:397-400.

LAURANCE, WF. 2010. Habitat destruction: death by a thousand cuts. Pp. 73-87 en: Sodhi, NS & PR Ehrlich (eds.). Conservation Biology for All. Oxford University Press.

LEIBOLD, MA & P GEDDES. 2005. El concepto de nicho en las metacomunidades. Ecología Austral, 15:117-129.

LIPPOLT, GE; PH VIGLIANO; MF ALONSO; PJ MACHI; D MILANO; ET AL. 2011. Comparative analysis between gill netting and sport fi sher catches in a small patagonic andean lake: its implications for resource evaluation and management. Ecología Austral, 21:71-85.

MILESI, FA & J LOPEZ DE CASENAVE. 2005. El concepto de nicho en Ecología aplicada: del nicho al hecho hay mucho trecho. Ecología Austral, 15:131-149.

MORRISON, ML; BG MARCOT & RW MANNAN. 2006. Wildlife- habitat relationships: Concepts and Applications. Third Edition. Island Press, Washington D.C. Pp. 494.

ODUM, EP. 1972. Ecología. Tercera Edición. Nueva Editorial Interamericana SA, México D.F. Pp. 639.

PETERS, RH. 1991. A critique for Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Pp. 366.

REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA. 2001. Diccionario de la Lengua Española, Vigésima Segunda Edición. Espasa Calpe S.A., Grupo Editorial Planeta S.A.I.C., Buenos Aires, Argentina.

STEPHENS, DW & JR KREBS. 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Pp. 248.

STATXACT-9. 2010. A statistical package for exact nonparametric inference. Cytel Software Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

TIONE, ML; JC BEDANO & MT BLARASIN. 2011. Comunidades de invertebrados en aguas subterráneas y su relación con variables ambientales. Ecología Austral, 21:87-100.

UDVARDY, MFD. 1959. Notes on the ecological concepts of habitat, biotope and niche. Ecology, 40:725-728.

VÁZQUEZ, DP. 2005. Reconsiderando el nicho hutchinsoniano. Ecología Austral, 15:149-158.

WHITTAKER, RH; SA LEVIN & RB ROOT. 1973. Niche, habitat and ecotope. Am. Nat., 107:321-338.

Published

2012-08-01

How to Cite

Di Bitetti, M. S. (2012). What is habitat? Ambiguity in the use of technical jargon. Ecología Austral, 22(2), 137–143. Retrieved from https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1257

Issue

Section

Short Communications