Are private refuges effective for conserving ecosystem properties?

Authors

  • Mateo v Laboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección (LART), Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Alejandra Carminati Programa de Refugios de Vida Silvestre, Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Fernando Biganzoli Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • José M. Paruelo LART – IFEVA y Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires – CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Keywords:

Private land conservation, remote sensing, ecosystem functioning, Paranaense forest, Mesopotamic Pampa, Interior Pampa

Abstract

To evaluate the contribution to conservation of private refuges, we compared the ecosystem functioning of this type of conservation (Refuge) with contiguous national parks (Park) and rural ranches and farms under traditional management (Traditional). We assume the Park as the reference situation, in as much they constitute the areas with the lowest human intervention. The analysis was based on three descriptors of the seasonal dynamics of the carbon gains, derived from spectral data provided by the MODIS sensor: the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index integral (NDVI-I), a spectral index related to the total carbon gains of the ecosystem; the relative range [RRel: (maximum NDVI–minimum NDVI)/(NDVI-I)], and the month of occurrence of the maximum value of NDVI (MMax). These last two attributes characterize the seasonality and phenology of vegetation. We worked on three contrasting biogeographic regions of Argentina [Paranaense forest (Misiones province), Mesopotamic Pampa (Entre Ríos province), Interior Pampa (Córdoba province)]. In the Paranaense forest, the Refuge presented a lower NDVI-I value than the Park, but higher than the Traditional (P<0.05). The seasonality of the vegetation carbon gains (RRel) was lower on the Park than for the other two managements. In the Mesopotamic Pampa, the gallery forests were the most productive unit (higher NDVI-I). The Refuge presented an intermediate behavior. Grasslands presented the highest NDVI-I on the Refuge (P<0.05). The emblematic vegetation of this region (the palm savannas), did not differ among managements. The seasonality was lower in the gallery forests of the Park. In the Interior Pampa, the differences between Refuge and Traditional, both in NDVI-I and RRel, were not significantly different among vegetation types or managements. The MMax did not differ between managements for any of the regions studied. Our results showed that for most of the ecosystem attributes considered, the Refuge presented values more similar to those of the reference situation (the Park) than to the traditional management alternatives. Private conservation therefore has being efficient for the conservation and maintenance of the ecosystemic processes and services bounded to the dynamic of the vegetation carbon gains.

References

ADMINISTRACIÓN DE PARQUES NACIONALES. 2008. Fichas temáticas de las áreas protegidas, en: www.parque snacionales.gov.ar/_inicio.htm (último acceso 29/05/2010)

ALLEN, TFH & TW HOESKSTRA. 1992. Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press. New York, USA.

ALTESOR, A; M OESTERHELD; E LEONI; F LEZAMA & C RODRÍGUEZ. 2005. Effects of grazing on community structure and productivity of a Uruguayan grassland. Plant. Ecol., 179:83-91.

ALTESOR A; G PIÑEIRO; F LEZAMA; RB JACKSON; M SARASOLA; ET AL. 2006. Ecosystem changes associated with grazing in subhumid South American grasslands. J. Veg. Sci., 17:323-332.

ARTURI, M. 2006. Situación Ambiental en la Ecoregión Espinal. Pp. 241-246 en: Brown, AD; U Martínez Ortiz; M Acerbi & J Corcuera (eds.). La Situación Ambiental Argentina 2005. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 587 pp.

BRYE, KR; ST GOWER; JM NORMAN & LG BUNDY. 2002. Carbon budgets for a prairie and agroecosystems: effects of land use and interannual variability. Ecol. Appl., 12:962-979.

BURKART, R; NO BÁRBARO; RO SÁNCHEZ & DA GÓMEZ. 1999. Ecorregiones de la Argentina. APN, Programa Desarrollo Institucional Ambiental. APN. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 29 pp.

BURKE, IC; WK LAUENROTH & WJ PARTON. 1997. Regional and temporal variability in aboveground net primary productivity and net N mineralization in grasslands. Ecology, 78:1330-1340.

CABRERA, A. 1976. Regiones Fitogeográficas Argentinas. Pp. 1-85 en: Enciclopedia Argentina de Agricultura y Jardinería. Editorial ACME. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

CASTELLI, L. 2001. Conservación de la Naturaleza en Tierras de Propiedad Privada. FARN-ARCA. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 191 pp.

CHACÓN, CM. 2005. Desarrollando Áreas Protegidas Privadas: Herramientas, Criterios e Incentivos. Asociación Conservación de la Naturaleza. San José, Costa Rica. 70 pp.

CHAPIN, FS; PA MATSON & HA MOONEY. 2002. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. Pp. 660-681 en: Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer Verlag. New York, USA.

CHAPIN, FS & G WHITEMAN. 1998. Sustainable Development of the Boreal Forest: Interaction of Ecological, Social and Business Feedbacks. Conserv. Ecol., 2(2):12. En www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol2/iss2/art12/ (último acceso 29/05/2010).

COLE, JJ; S FINDLAY & ML PACE. 1988. Bacterial production in fresh and salt water ecosystems: a cross-system overview. Marine Ecol. Progress Series, 4:1-10.

CORBELLA, C. 2003. Identificación de las Áreas Valiosas del Pastizal en el Cono Sur de Sudamérica. Encuesta Trinacional: Uruguay-Brasil-Argentina. Planilla de postulación de un área valiosa del pastizal (AVP). Red de Refugios de Vida Silvestre, Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 28 pp.

DI BELLA, CM; CM REBELLA & JM PARUELO. 2000. Evaporation estimates using NOAA AVHRR imagery in the Pampa region of Argentina. Int. J. Remote Sens., 21:791-797.

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW INSTITUTE (ELI). 2003. Conservación Privada en Latinoamérica: Herramientas Legales y Modelos para el Éxito. Pronatura A.C. México DF, México. 173 pp.

FOLEY, JA; R DEFRIES; GP ASNER; C BARFORD; G BONAN; ET AL. 2005. Global Consequences of Land Use. Science, 309:570-574.

GARBULSKY, MF. 2004. Distribución y funcionamiento de las áreas protegidas de Argentina. Diferencias funcionales con áreas bajo uso agropecuario. Tesis de Maestría, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

GRIGERA, G; M OESTERHELD & F PACÍN. 2007. Monitoring forage production for farmers’ decision making. Agri. Sys., 94:637-648.

GOLLEY, FB. 1993. A history of the ecosystem concept in ecology. Yale University Press. New Haven, USA.

GUSTANSKI, JA & RH SQUIRES (EDS.). 2000. Protecting the Land: Conservation Easements Past, Present, and Future. Island Press. Washington DC, USA. 450 pp.

HOUGHTON, RA. 1995. Land-use change and the carbon cycle. Glob. Change Biol., 1:275-287.

HUNT, CE (ED.). 1997. Conservation on private lands: an owner’s manual. World Wildlife Fund, Wildlife Habitat Council, with the Land Trust Alliance. Washington DC, USA. 353 pp.

KIESECKER, JM; T COMENDANT; T GRANDMASON; E GRAY; C HALL; R HILSENBECK; ET AL. 2007. Conservation easements in context: a quantitative analysis of their use by The Nature Conservancy. Front. Ecol. Environ., 5(3):125-130.

LANGHOLZ, JA; JP LASSOIE; D LEE & D CHAPMAN. 2000. Economic considerations of privately owned parks. Ecological Economics, 33:173-183.

LITTELL, RC; GA MILLIKEN; WW STROUP & RD WOLFINGER. 1996. SAS(r) System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.

MARGULES, CR & RL PRESSEY. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405:243-253.

MCNAUGHTON, SJ; M OESTERHELD; DA FRANK & KJ WILLIAMS. 1989. Ecosystem-level patterns of primary productivity and herbivory in terrestrial habitats. Nature, 341:142-144.

MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press. Washington DC, USA. 137 pp.

MITTERMEIER, RA; P ROBLES GIL; M HOFFMANN; J PILGRIM; T BROOKS; ET AL. 2004. Hotspots Revisited: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. Agrupación Sierra Madre S.C. México DF, México.

MONTEITH, JL. 1981. Climatic variation and the growth of crops. Q. J. Royal. Meteorol. Soc., 107: 749-74.

MORENO, D; A CARMINATI; N MACHAIN & M ROLDÁN. 2008. Reseña sobre las reservas privadas en la Argentina. Pp. 7-33 en: Chacón, CM (ed.). Voluntad de Conservar: Experiencias seleccionadas de conservación por la sociedad civil en Iberoamérica. Asociación Conservación de la Naturaleza. San José, Costa Rica. 184 pp.

MORENO, D & A CARMINATI. 2007. Programa Refugios de Vida Silvestre. Promoviendo la Conservación de tierras privadas en la Argentina. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 10 pp.

MYERS, N; RA MITTERMEIER; CG MITTERMEIER; GAB DA FONSECA & J KENT. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403:853-858.

NOSETTO, M; EG JOBBÁGY & JM PARUELO. 2005. Land use change and water losses: the case of grassland afforestation across a soil textural gradient in central Argentina. Glob. Change Biol., 11:1101-1117.

OESTERHELD, M; OE SALA & SJ MCNAUGHTON. 1992. Effect of animal husbandry on herbivore-carrying capacity at a regional scale. Nature, 356:234-236.

OESTERHELD, M; J LORETI; M SEMMARTIN & JM PARUELO. 1999. Grazing, fire and climate effects on primary productivity of grasslands and savannas. Pp. 287- 306 en: Walter, L (ed.). Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground. Elsevier Science. Oxford, UK.

OYARZABAL, M; C OYONARTE & A GIORNO. 2008. Propuesta de un sistema de seguimiento y alerta para la gestión de espacios protegidos: el caso del Parque Natural Cabo de Gata-Níjar (Almería, España). Ecosistemas, 17(3):98-107

PAGIOLA, S; A ARCENAS; ET AL. 2005. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Dev., 33(2):237-253.

PARUELO, JM & WK LAUENROTH. 1995. Regional Patterns of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index in North American Shrublands and Grasslands. Ecology 76(6):1888-1898.

PARUELO, JM; HE EPSTEIN; WK LAUENROTH & IC BURKE. 1997. ANPP estimates from NDVI for the Central Grassland Region of the US. Ecology, 78:953-958.

PARUELO, JM & WK LAUENROTH. 1998. Interannual variability of NDVI and its relationship to climate for North American shrublands and grasslands. J. Biogeogr., 25:721-733.

PARUELO, JM; IC BURKE & WK LAUENROTH. 2001. Land-use impact on ecosystem functioning in eastern Colorado, USA. Glob. Change Biol., 7:631-639.

PARUELO, JM; MF GARBULSKI; JP GUERSCHMAN & EG JOBBÁGY. 2004. Two decades of Normalizad Vegetation Index changes in South America: identifying the imprint of global change. Int. J. Remote Sens., 25:1-14.

PARUELO, JM; G PIÑEIRO; C OYONARTE; D. ALCARAZ; J CABELLO; ET AL. 2005 Temporal and spatial patterns of ecosystem functioning in protected arid areas of Southeastern Spain. Applied Vegetation Science, 8:93-102.

PARUELO, JM. 2008. La caracterización funcional de ecosistemas mediante sensores remotos. Ecosistemas, 17:4-22.

PIÑEIRO, G; D ALCARAZ; JM PARUELO; C OYONARTE; JP GUERSCHMAN; ET AL. 2002. A Functional Classification of Natural and Human-Modified Areas of ‘Cabo de Gata’, Spain, Based on Landsat TM Data. 29th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

PIÑEIRO, G; M OESTERHELD & JM PARUELO. 2006. Seasonal Variation in Aboveground Production and Radiation-use Efficiency of Temperate rangelands Estimated through Remote Sensing. Ecosystems, 9:357-373.

PLACÍ, G & M DI BITETTI. 2006. Situación Ambiental en la Ecoregión del Bosque Atlántico del Alto Paraná (Selva Paranaense). Pp. 197-210 en: Brown, AD; U Martínez Ortiz; M Acerbi & J Corcuera (eds.). La Situación Ambiental Argentina 2005. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 587 pp.

PRIMACK, RB & J ROS. 2002. Conservación al nivel de comunidad, en: Introducción a la Biología de la Conservación. Editorial Ariel. Barcelona, España.

RAPPORT, DJ; R COSTANZA & AJ MCMICHAEL. 1998. Assessing ecosystem health. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13:397-402.

RED DE REFUGIOS DE VIDA SILVESTRE. 2007. Bases, Criterios y Procedimientos de la Red de Refugios de Vida Silvestre. FVSA. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 38 pp.

SAS INSTITUTE INC. 1989. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, 4th Ed., North Carolina, USA.

SCHIAFFINO, K; S CHEDIACK; G GATTI; J ALONSO; G PLACCI; ET AL. 2001. Relevamiento Ambiental del establecimiento “El Yaguareté”. Red de Refugios de Vida Silvestre, Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 51 pp.

SCHMUGGE, T. 1990. Measurements of surface soil moisture and temperature, en: RJ Hobbs & HA Mooney (eds.). Remote Sensing of Biosphere Functioning. Springer- Verlag. New York, USA.

SELLERS, PJ; SO LOS; CJ TUCKER; CO JUSTICE; DA DAZLICH; ET AL. 1996. A revised land surface parameterization (Sib2) for atmospheric Gcms. Part II: the generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from satellite data. J. Clim. K., 9:706-737.

SORIANO, A. 1991. Río de La Plata Grasslands. Pp. 367-407 en: R.T. Coupland (ed.), Ecosystems of the World: 8A: Natural Grasslands. Introduction and Western Hemisphere. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

UNIÓN INTERNACIONAL PARA LA CONSERVACIÓN DE LA NATURALEZA. 2007. IUCN Protected Areas Management Categories, en: www.iucn.org/themes/wcpa/theme/ categories/what.html.

VAN DYKE, F. 2008. Conservation Biology. Foundation, concepts, applications. 2nd Ed. Springer Verlag. New York, USA. 477 pp

VIGLIZZO, E; F FRANK & L CARREÑO. 2006. Situación Ambiental en las Ecorregiones Pampa y Campos y Malezales. Pp. 261-269 en: Brown, AD; U Martínez Ortiz; M Acerbi & J Corcuera (eds.). La Situación Ambiental Argentina 2005. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 587 pp.

VIRGINIA, RA & DH WALL. 1999. How soils structure communities in the Antarctic Dry Valleys. BioScience, 49(12):973-983.

VITOUSEK, PM. 1992. Global Environmental Change: An Introduction. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 23:1-14.

VITOUSEK, PM. 1993. Beyond Global Warming: Ecology and Global Change. Ecology, 75:1861-1876.

VITOUSEK, PM; HA MOONEY; J LUBCHENCO & JM MELILLO. 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277:494-499.

ZUNINO, G. 1997. Relevamiento Ambiental de la estancia “La Aurora del Palmar”, provincia de Entre Ríos. Red de Refugios de Vida Silvestre, Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 63 pp.

Published

2010-08-01

How to Cite

v, M., Carminati, A., Biganzoli, F., & Paruelo, J. M. (2010). Are private refuges effective for conserving ecosystem properties?. Ecología Austral, 20(2), 185–199. Retrieved from https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1318