Estimating aerial biomass of six woody Leguminosae of the Arid Chaco (Argentina)
Keywords:
allometric models, aerial biomass, basic wood density, deciduous, xerophytic forestsAbstract
Reliable estimates of biomass forthe vegetation of the Arid Chaco forest is critical for its management, conservation or restoration. However, simple and non destructive techniques are not largely available. This study provides regression models aimed at estimating the aerial biomass of native shrub and tree species from the Arid Chaco, belonging to the Fabaceae family (Prosopis flexuosa, Geoffroea decorticans, Cercidium praecox, Acacia furcatispina, Mimoziganthus carinatus and Prosopis torquata). An additional objective was to explore the feasibility of using a single equation for several species. The wood density differed significantly between species. Linear and nonlinear regression models of aerial biomass were adjusted for species, with different combinations of base diameter (DAB) and height as independent variables. The models properly predicted the biomass by species, the most appropriate being the linear regression model using DAB2 as an independent variable. To establish differences in the behavior of species and, more precisely, in the ratio between total dry weight and DAB, the slope homogeneity was analyzed using a regression model with auxiliary variables. Taking into account the results obtained and the basic wood density and morphological growth structure, four groups of species have been postulated, and it was feasible to apply a single equation per group. The proposed groups are: (1) monopodial hardwood (Geoffroea decorticans and Cercidium praecox), (2) multi-stem shrubs of extremely heavy wood (Acacia furcatispina and Mimoziganthus carinatus), (3) monopodial of very heavy wood (Prosopis flexuosa) and (4) monopodial and multi-stem of extremely heavy wood (Prosopis torquata).
References
ACOSTA-MIRELES, M; A VARGAS-HERNÁNDEZ; A VELÁSQUEZ-MARTÍNEZ & JD ECHEVERS-BARRA. 2002. Estimación de la biomasa aérea mediante el uso de relaciones alométricas en seis especies arbóreas en Oaxaca. México. Agrociencia, 36:725-736.
ASNER, GP; CE BORGHI & R OJEDA. 2003. Desertification in central Argentina: changes in ecosystem carbon and nitrogen from imaging spectroscopy. Ecological Applications, 13(3):629-648.
AYALA, LB. 2005. Estudios de algunos aspectos de la fijación simbiótica de nitrógeno por el maní (Arachis hypoagea). II. Evaluación bioquímica de la fijación y factores relacionados en la asociación maní-rhizobium spp. Agronomía Tropical, 27:427-449.
BARCHUK, AH; E CAMPOS; C OVIEDO & P DÍAZ. 2006. Supervivencia y crecimiento de plántulas de especies leñosas del Chaco Árido sometidas a remoción de la biomasa aérea. Ecología Austral, 16:47-61.
BROWN, IF; LA MARTINELLI; WW THOMASD; MZ MOREIRA; CA CID FERREIRA ET AL. 1995. Uncertainty in the biomass of Amazonian forests: An example from Rondonia, Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, 75:175-189.
CABIDO, M; A ACOSTA; ML CARRANZA & S DÍAZ. 1992. La vegetación del Chaco Árido en el W de la Provincia de Córdoba; Argentina. Documents Phytosociologiques, 14:447-456.
CABRERA, AL. 1976. Regiones Fitogeográficas Argentinas. Pp. 1-85 en: Kugler, WF (ed.), Enciclopedia Argentina de Agricultura y Jardinería. Segunda edición. Editorial Acme S.A.C.I, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
CHAMBOULEYRON, M & W BRAUN. 1992. Producción primaria neta de tres leguminosas del piedemonte mendocino. Multequina, 1:65-71.
CUEVAS, E; S BROWN & AE LUGO. 1991. Above and below ground organic matter storage and production in a tropical pine plantation and a paired broadleaf secondary forest. Plant Soil, 135:257-268.
FELKER, PR; JF OSBORN & GH CANNEL. 1982. Biomass estimation in a young stand of mesquite (Prosopis spp.), ironwood (Olneya tesota), palo verde (Cercidium floridum and Parkinsonia aculeata) and leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala). J. Range Manage., 35:87-89.
FONSECA, WG; FG ALICE & JM REY. 2009. Modelos para estimar la biomasa de especies nativas en plantaciones y bosques secundarios en la zona Caribe de Costa Rica. Bosque, 30(1):36-47.
GAILLARD DE BENÍTEZ, C; M PECE; M JUÁREZ DE GALÍNDEZ; A MALDONADO; VH ACOSTA ET AL. 2000. Biomasa aérea de quebracho blanco (Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco) en dos localidades del Parque Chaqueño seco. Quebracho, 9:115-127.
GASPARRI, I & E MANGHI. 2004. Estimación de volumen. Biomasa y contenido de carbono de las regiones forestales argentinas. Unidad de Manejo del Sistema de Evaluación Forestal. Ministerio de Salud y Ambiente. Consultado 22 mar. 2010. Disponible en www.ambiente.gov.ar/archivos/web/UMSEF/File/volumen_biomasa_carbono.pdf.
GAYOSO, J. 2002. Medición de la capacidad de captura de carbono en bosques de Chile y promoción en el mercado mundial. Universidad Austral de Chile. Valdivia, Chile, 53 pp.
GUILLEN TRUJILLO, A; A PALACIOS ESPINOSA & JL ESPINOZA VILLAVICENCIO. 2007. Ecuaciones de predicción para la producción de forrajes de Palo verde (Cercidum floridum Bent H. ex A. Gra Y) en baja California Sur, México. Interciencia, 32:712-715.
GURVICH, D; L ENRICO & A CINGOLANI. 2005. Linking plant functional traits with post-fire sprouting vigour in woody species of central Argentina. Austral Ecology, 30:789-796.
HIERRO, JL; L BRANCH; D VILLARREAL & K CLARK. 2000. Predictive equations for biomass and fuel characteristics of Argentine shubs. J. Range Manage., 53:617-621.
HUSCH, B. 2001. Estimación del contenido de carbono de los bosques. Simposio Medición y Monitoreo de la Captura de Carbono en Ecosistemas Forestales.Valdivia, Universidad Austral de Chile, 9 pp.
INFOSTAT 2007. Grupo Infostat. FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Versión 2007. Argentina. INFOSTAT 2008. Manual del usuario. Versión 2008. Grupo Infostat. FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Argentina. Primera Edición. Editorial Brujas Argentinas.
KETTERING, QM; R COE; M VAN NOORDWJK; Y AMBAGAU & CA PALM. 2001. Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting aboveground tree biomass in mixed secondary forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 146:199-209.
LEÓN DE LA LUZ, JL; R DOMÍNGUEZ & S DÍAZ CASTRO. 2005. Evaluación de un análisis dimensional para predecir peso fresco del leño en dos especies de mezquite, Prosopis articulata S. Watson y P. palmeri S. Watson. Acta Botánica Mexicana, 72:17-32.
LOGUERCIO, GA & GE DEFOSSÉ. 2001. Ecuaciones de biomasa aérea. Factores de expansión y de reducción de la lenga Nothofagus pumilio (poepp. et endl.) Krasser, en el SO del Chubut. Argentina. Simposio Internacional Medición y Monitoreo de la Captura de Carbono en Ecosistemas Forestales, 11 Pp.
MELO, LAMN; RV SOARES; JDP SIQUEIRA & FF KIRCHNER. 2006. Modelagem de combustiveis florestais no Parque Nacional do Iguacu, Paraná, Brasil. Floresta, 36(3):415-424.
MÉNDEZ GONZÁLEZ, J; F MORALES CARREDANO; VJ RUIZ GARCÍA & JA NÁJERA LUNA. 2002. Ajuste de modelos para estimar biomasa fustal en Pinus cooperi y P. leiophylla, de la región del Salto; Durango, México. Agrociencia, 36:725-736.
MOGLIA, M & G JOFRÉ. 1998. Response to clearing of woody plants in a forest of quebracho blanco (Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco) and algarrobo (Prosopis flexuosa) in the Province of San Luis (Argentina). Pitón, 63:257-265.
MONTGOMERY, DC. 1991. Diseño y Análisis de Experimentos. Grupo Editorial Iberoamérica.
NÁVAR-CHÁIDEZ, JJ & S GONZÁLEZ-ELIZONDO. 2009. Diversidad, estructura y productividad de bosques templados de Durango, México. Polibotanica, 27:71-87.
ORDÓÑEZ, JAB & O MASERA. 2001. Captura de carbono ante el cambio climático. Maderas y Bosques, 7(1):3-12.
PADRÓN, E & RM NAVARRO CERRILLO. 2003. Above-Ground Biomass in Natural Populations of Prosopis pallida HBK in the North Peru. Journal of Arid Environmental, 56:283-292.
PATON, D; J NÚÑEZ; D BAO & A MUÑOZ. 2002. Forage biomass of 22 shrub species from Monfragüe Natural Park (SW Spain) assessed by log-log regression models. Journal of Arid Environments, 52(2):223-231.
PÉREZ CORDERO, LD & M KANNINEN M. 2002. Wood specific gravity and aboveground biomass of Bombacopsis quinata plantations in Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management, 165:1-9.
SAH, JP; MS ROSS; S KOPTUR & JR ZINDER. 2004. Estimating aboveground biomass of broadleaved woody plants in the understory of Florida Keys pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 203: 319-329.
SAMPAIO, EVSB & GC SILVA. 2005. Biomass equations for Brazilian semiarid caatinga plants. Acta Bot. Brasilica, 19:935-943.
SEGURA, M & H ANDRADE. 2008. ¿Cómo hacerlo? ¿Cómo construir modelos alométricos de volumen, biomasa o carbono de especies leñosas perennes? Agroforestería de las Américas, 46:89-96.
SEGURA, M & M KANNINEN. 2005. Allometric Models for Tree Volume and Total Aboveground Biomass in a Tropical Humid Forest in Costa Rica. Biotropica, 37(1):2-8.
SEGURA, M. 1997. Almacenamiento y fijación de carbono en Quercus costarricensis, en un bosque de altura en la cordillera de Talamanca, Costa Rica. Tesis de Licenciatura, Universidad Nacional. Heredia, Costa Rica. Escuela de Ciencias Ambientales, 126 pp.
SOKAL, RE. 1994. Biometry. Ed. WH Freeman and Company, 887 pp.
SPECHT, A & PW WEST. 2003. Estimation of biomasa and sequesteres carbono in faro forest plantations in northen New South Wales, Australia. Biomass and Bioenergy, 25:363-379.
TER-MIKAELIAN, MT & MD KORZUKHIN. 1997. Biomass equation for sixty-five North American tree species. For. Ecol. Manage., 97:1-24.
VALENCIA, MS & FA LÓPEZ. 1999. Variación de la densidad de la madera dentro y entre árboles de Pinus rudis Endl.; en Sierra Las Alazanas, Arteaga, Coah. Foresta-AN. Nota Técnica No. 1. UAAAN. Saltillo, Coah, 17 pp.
VERWIJST, T. 1991. Logarithmic transformations in biomass estimation procedures: violation of the linearity assumption in regression analysis. Biomass and Bioenergy, 1:175-180.
ZABEK, LM & CE PRESCOTT. 2006. Biomass equations and carbon content of aboveground leafless biomass of hybrid poplar in coastal British Columbia. Forest Ecology Management, 223:291-302.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 María del Rosario Iglesias, Alicia Haydée Barchuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.