Scientific practice and funding: An awaiting debate in Ecology
Keywords:
funds, research, legitimation, neutrality, objectivityAbstract
In the present article we analyze and discuss the interactions among the practice of the Ecology, funding sources and environmental problems. These interactions have two point of view that reflect the explicit or subtle ways in which 1) funding sources have influences on the scientific practice and 2) science have an effect on the funding agents . We explore these two aspects, discussing on the mechanisms that help in concealing the intrinsic tension of this relationship, displacing the discussion out of the scientific agenda. We focus on the epistemological conceptions that explain the absence of inquiry regarding the influence of funding source in the scientific practice. We also explore the fact that since one of the aims of Ecology is to look for solutions to environmental problems it is strongly affected by the demands of the society. Ecology, therefore, could be used by funding agents to legitimate their own interests, which may be far from the answers that society demands from Ecology. We conclude that the incorporation of this debate in the scientist’s agenda is crucial for the discipline development, in particular for applied researches on environmental problems.
References
DE LAPLANTE, K. 2004. Toward a more expansive conception of ecological science. Biology and Philosophy, 19(2):263-281.
GIANNI, A.; P FRANCHINI & F MADERNA. 2007. En los dominios de la ”neutralidad científica”- La actividad sociológica como financiamiento y olvido. En: Gonzáles, H (ed.) Historia crítica de la Sociología Argentina. Ed. Colihue, Bs. As.
GÓMEZ, R. 1995. Racionalidad: epistemología y ontología. En: Olivé, L (ed.) Racionalidad Epistémica. Trotta. España.
GOULD, S. 1997. La falsa medida del hombre. Crítica. Barcelona.
HANSON, N. 1958. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
HARAWAY, D. 1999. La promesa de los monstruos: una política regeneradora para otros inapropiados/ bles. Política y Sociedad, 30. Pp. 121-163.
KITCHER, P. 2001. Science truth and democracy. Oxford University Press, New York.
KUHN, T. 1999. La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México.
LEWONTIN, RC. 1991. Biology as ideology: the doctrine of DNA. Anansi Press Limited.
MARONE, L. & R GONZÁLEZ DEL SOLAR. 2005. Imaginación e innovación. Aportes de la ciencia y la tecnología a la cultura y la sociedad. Boletín de la Biblioteca del Congreso (Argentina), 122:99-116.
MARONE, L & R GONZÁLEZ DEL SOLAR. 2007. Crítica, creatividad y rigor: vértices de un triángulo culturalmente valioso. Interciencia, 32(5):354-357.
MCNAUGHTON, SJ & LL WOLF. 1984. Ecología General. Omega. Barcelona
MENNA, S. 2004. La nueva metodología de la ciencia. N.R. Hanson y la lógica de la plausibilidad. Universitas. Editoria Científica Universitaria de Córdoba. Argentina.
PETERS, RH. 1991. A critic for ecology. Cambridge, MA. Cambridge University Press
NÚÑEZ, P & CL MORALES. Disputas en torno al concepto de Ecología. Cuadernos del Sur. (aceptado para publicación).
POPPER, K. 1963. Conjetures and refutations. Routledge. Londres. REICHENBACH, H. 1938. Experience and prediction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
ROBIN, J. 2002. La ecología política y el siglo XXI. Transversales Science Culture 1, nueva serie, primer trimestre 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Paula G. Núñez, Cecilia I. Núñez, Carolina L. Morales
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.