Dynamic programming in migration processes studies
Keywords:
optimization, juvenile salmonids migration, PatagoniaAbstract
Dynamic programming is an optimization process that allows obtaining a decisions sequence that gives an optimal solution of a problem in study. This work applies this tool to study the displacement of young salmonids during their stay in their natal stream. This displacement depends on their needs, according to their age and physical condition, but it is also related with the environment offer. Our objective was to model this process by mean of the dynamic programming, in order to describe the optimal journey that guaranties to fishes the future survival. From the model, we could reconstruct optimal journeys; find out relations between the migration process and individual weights. We divide the stream in three sectors, characterized through substrate and cover types. Sector I (superior) has higher cover proportion, low deep; erode bank, logs, roots, floating leaves, and thick substrate. Sector II (middle) has an intermediate cover proportion: erode bank, submerged and marginal vegetation, few logs and branches, with thin substrate. Sector III (near to the estuary) has low cover proportion, very diverse, heterogeneous substrate, runners and deep sites. The model shows that sector I is chosen especially by low weights and early ages individuals, with gradual displacements to the sector II, mostly occupied by mean weight and age fishes. Sector III presents high permanency of major weight and age fishes. This fact could respond to their better adaptation capacity to profundity and runners. The model considers simultaneously weight, age, competence, individual behavior and environmental characteristics related with food and protection supply. The dynamic programming has been a suitable structure for this problem that incorporates observed data and stochastic processes.
References
BALTZ, DM; B VONDRACEK; LR BROWN & P MOYLE. 1991. Seasonal changes in microhabitat selection by rainbow trout in a small stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 120:166-176.
BELLMAN, R. 1957. Dynamic Programming. Research Study. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey.
BELLO MT & V HOUGHAM. 2001. Migraciones “lakeward” de truchas juveniles en el arroyo Loncochinocco, afluente del lago Gutiérrez. Resúmenes 1o Reunión Binacional Argentino-Chilena de Ecología. Pp 253.
BERTSEKAS, D. 1987. Dynamic Programming. Prentice Hall. New Jersey. BISCAYART, C. 2007. La programación dinámica en la migración de salmónidos. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Neuquén, Argentina.
BJÖRNN, TC & DW REISER. 1991. Habitats requirements of salmonids streams. Am. Fish. Soc. Special Public. 19:83-138.
BJÖRNN, TC; SC KIRKING & WR MEEHAN. 1991. Relation of cover alterations to the summer standing crop of young salmonids in small Southeast Alaska streams. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 120:562-570.
BOOZEK, MA & FJ RAHEL. 1991. Assessing habitat requirements of young Colorado River cutthroat trout across sites and among years in Wyoming streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49(3):552-564.
CHAPMAN, DW. 1966. Food and Space as regulators of salmonid populations in streams. Am. Nat. 100(913):345-357.
CIANCIO, JE; MA PASCUAL & DA BEAUCHAMP. 2007. Energy density of Patagonian aquatic organisms and empirical predictions based on water contents. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 136:1415-1422.
CLARK, CW & C MANGEL. 2000. Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
CUNJAK, RA & G POWER. 1987. Cower use by stream- resident trout in winter: A field experiment. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 7:539-544.
DE ANGELIS, RL; BJ SHUTER; MS RIDWAY & M SCHEFFER. 1993. Modeling growth and survival in an age-0 fish cohort. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 122:927-941.
ELLNER SP & M REES. 2007. Stochastic stable population growth in integral projection models: theory and applications. J. Math. Biol. 54:227-256.
FARMER, AH & JA WONS. 1999. Models and reality: time-energy trade-off in pectoral sand piper (Calidris Melanotos) migration. Ecology 80(8):2566-2580.
GIBSON, RJ. 1993. The Atlantic salmon in fresh water: spawning, rearing and production. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 3:39-73.
HANSON, FB & D RYAN. 1998. Optimal harvesting with both population and price dynamic. Math. Biosci. 148:129-146.
HARRISON, P; D SPRING; M MACKENZIE & R MACNALLY. 2008. Dynamic reserve design with the union find algorithm. Ecol. Model. 215:369-376.
HEGGENES, J. 1988. Substrate preferences of brown trout fry in artificial stream channels. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45:1801-1806.
HOWARD, R. 1960. Dynamic Programming and Markov Process. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (MIT). Cambridge, MA, USA.
KEUP, LE. 1988. Invertebrate fish food resources of lotic environments. Instream flow information paper No 24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Biological Report 88(13). Washington.
LEW, A & H MAUCH. 2007. Dynamic Programming: A Computational Tool. Springer. Berlin.
MACCHI, PJ; PH VIGLIANO; MA PACUAL; M ALONSO; MA DENEGRI ET AL. 2008. Historical policy goals for fish management in northern continental Patagonia Argentina: A structuring force of actual fish assemblages? American Fisheries Society Symposium 44:331-348.
MAMCARDZ, A & D GOLONKA. 1989. An attempt to determine the level of variability of morphological features of peled (Coregonus peled Gmel) during larval development. Acta Hydrobiol. 31(1-2):97-107.
MANGEL, C & CW CLARK. 1988. Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecolology. Priceton University Press. Priceton, New Jersey.
MCCARTHY, MA; HP POSSINGHAM & AM GILL. 2001. Using stochastic dynamic programming to determine optimal fire management for Branksia ornata. J. Appl. Ecol. 38:000-008.
MORTENSEN, E. 1977. Density-dependent mortality of trout fry Salmo trutta L., and its relationship to the management of small streams. J. Fish Biol. 11:613-617.
OLLASON, JG. 1987. Foraging Theory and Design. Pp. 549-561 en Kamil, AC; J Krebs & HR Pulliam (eds.) Foraging Behavior. Plenum Publishing Corporation. USA.
PASCUAL, MA; V CUSSAC; B DYER; D SOTO, P VIGLIANO ET AL. 2007. Freshwater fishes of Patagonia in the 21st. century after a hundred year of human ettlement, species introductions, and environmental change. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manage. 10:212-227.
PURCELL, J & A BRODIN. 2007. Factor influencing route choice by avian migrant: A dynamic programming model of Pacific brant migration. J. Theor. Biol. 249:804-816.
RALEIGH, RF; LD ZUCKERMAN & PC NELSON. 1986. Habitat suitability index models and instream flow suitability curves: brown trout. U. S. Fish Wild. Serv. Biol. Rep. 82:1-65.
SCHIEMER, F & M ZALEWSKI. 1992. The importance of riparian ecotones for diversity and productivity of riverine fish communities. Neth. J. Zool. Rep. 42(2-3):223-335.
STRANGE, N; BJ THORSEN & J BLADT. 2006. Optimal reserve selection in a dynamic model. Biol. Conserv. 131:31-41.
THORPE, JE. 1981. Migration in salmonids, with special reference to juvenile movements in freshwater. En: Brannon, EL & EO Salo (eds.). Salmon and Trout Migratory Behavior Symposium. Univ. of Washington. Seattle. USA.
WANLESS, S; MP HARRIS; P REDMAN & JR SPEAKMAN. 2005. Low energy values of fish as a probable cause of a major seabird breeding failure in the North Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 294:1-8.
WESTPHAL, MI; M PICKETT; WM GETZ & HP POSSINGHAM. 2003. The use of stochastic dynamic programming in optimal landscape reconstruction for metapopulations. Ecol. Appl. 13(2):543-555.
WEBER, T; BJ ENS & AI HOUSTON. 1998. Optimal avian migration: A dynamic model of fuel store and site use. Evol. Ecol. 12:377-401.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.