Soybean expansion and agriculture diversity in Argentina

Authors

  • Marcelo A. Aizen Laboratorio Ecotono, INIBIOMA-CONICET y Centro Regional Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.
  • Lucas A. Garibaldi Laboratorio Ecotono, INIBIOMA-CONICET y Centro Regional Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina. Cátedra de Métodos Cuantitativos Aplicados, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Mariana Dondo Laboratorio Ecotono, INIBIOMA-CONICET y Centro Regional Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.

Keywords:

crops, dominance, evenness, soybean

Abstract

The environmental and socio-economic consequences of the great expansion of soybean (Glycine max) cultivation in Argentina during the last two decades are strongly debated in our society. Soybean and its derivatives constitute presently most important Argentina’s export and cash source. Here, we tested whether soybean ́s expansion has caused a detectable decrease in crop diversity. We specifically assessed changes in total cultivated area, identity and degree of dominance of the most important crop (i.e., the one accounting for the largest proportion of the total cultivated area), and crop diversity over the period 1961-2006. Argentina’s total cultivated area increased by about 45% from 1990 to 2006 and it was associated with a replacement of wheat by soybean as the dominant crop. In 2006 soybean accounted for ~50% of the total cultivated area in our country, the largest dominance reached by any crop during the last five decades. Different diversity indicators, including Shannon- Wiener ́s H ́, Pielou ́s J and Hurlbert ́s PIE indexes agreed that crop diversity has decreased >20% during the period of soybean dominance. In addition to the direct loss of biodiversity caused by deforestation for agriculture expansion, our results evidence a trend towards homogenization of Argentina’s agriculture landscape with likely consequences for remnant biodiversity, degradation of different ecosystem services, and a more vulnerable production structure.

References

ALTIERI, MA. 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:19-31.

ALTIERI, MA & WA PENGUE. 2006. La soja transgénica en América Latina. Biodiversidad 47:14-19.

BISANG, R. 2003. Apertura económica, innovación y estructura productiva: la aplicación de biotecnología en la producción agrícola pampeana argentina. Desarrollo Económico 43:413-442.

BROWN, JL & GH ORIANS. 1970. Spacing patterns in mobile animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:239-262.

CASAS, R. 2005. Efectos de la intensificación agrícola sobre los suelos. Ciencia Hoy 87:42-43.

CEPAL. 2005. Análisis sistémico de la agriculturización en la Pampa Húmeda argentina y sus consecuencias en regiones extrapampeanas: sostenibilidad, brechas de conocimiento e integración de políticas. Serie Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo No. 118.

DONALD, PF. 2004. Biodiversity impacts of some agricultural commodity production systems. Conserv Biol 18:17-37.

FAO. 2008. El estado de la inseguridad alimentaria en el mundo. Disponible en http://www.fao.org/SOF/sofi/index_es.htm.

FAOSTAT. 2007. Datos disponibles en http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567. Último acceso en junio de 2008.

FEDRIANI, JM; TK FULLER; RM SAUVAJOT & EC YORK. 2000. Competition and intraguild predation among three sympatric carnivores. Oecologia 125:258-270.

GRAU, R; M AIDE & I GASPARRI. 2005. Globalization and soybean expansion into semiarid ecoystems of Argentina. Ambio 34:265-266.

HILL, MO. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427-432.

HILLEBRAND, H; DM BENNETT & MW CADOTTE. 2008. Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. Ecology 89:1510-1520.

HURLBERT, SH. 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52:577-585.

INTA. 2003. El INTA ante la preocupación ante la sustentabilidad de largo plazo de la producción agropecuaria argentina. Disponible en http://www.grr.org.ar/articulos/INTA_sustentabilidad.pdf.

INTA. 2004. El avance de la soja en la Argentina y la sostenibilidad de los sistemas agrícolas. Disponible en http://www.inta.gov.ar/reconquista/crsantafe/docsoja.htm.

JACKSON JB & L BUSS. 1975. Alleopathy and spatial competition among coral reef invertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:5160-5163.

JOST, L. 2006. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363-375.

KLEIN, AM; BE VAISSIERE; JH CANE; I STEFFAN-DEWENTER; SA CUNNINGHAM ET AL. 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc B 274:303-313.

KREMEN, C; NM WILLIAMS; MA AIZEN; B GEMMILL- HERREN; G LEBUHN ET AL. 2007. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land use change. Ecol Lett 10:299-314.

MAGURRAN, AE. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Croom Helm, London.

MANZANAL, M. 1995. Globalización y ajuste en la realidad regional argentina: reestructuración o difusión de la pobreza? Realidad Económica 134:67-82.

MORSE, DH. 1970. Ecological aspects of some mixed-species foraging flocks of birds. Ecol Monogr 40:119-168.

PARUELO, J; JP GUERSCHMAN & S VERÓN. 2005. Expansión agrícola y cambios en el uso del suelo. Ciencia Hoy 87:14-23.

PIELOU, EC. 1969. An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley, New York.

RODRIGUEZ, J. 2005. Consecuencias económicas de la difusión de la soja genéticamente modificada en Argentina, 1996-2006. Disponible en http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/ar/libros/becas/2005/soja/rodri.pdf.

SÁBATO, JF. 1981. La pampa pródiga: claves de una frustración. Cisea, Buenos Aires.

SAGPYA. 2008. Datos disponibles en http://www.sagpya.gov.ar/. Último acceso en junio de 2008.

SATORRE, EH. 2005. Cambios tecnológicos en la agricultura argentina actual. Ciencia Hoy 87:24-31.

SCHVARZER, J. 1997. La estructura productiva argentina a mediados de la década del noventa: tendencias visibles y un diagnóstico con interrogantes. CEEED, Instituto de Investigaciones económicas. FCE-UBA, Buenos Aires.

SMITH, VH; GD TILMAN & JC NEKOLA. 1999. Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environ Pollut 100:179-196.

TEUBAL, M. 2006. Soja transgénica y crisis del modelo agroalimentario argentino. Realidad Económica 196:52-74.

THRUPP, LA. 2000. Linking agricultural biodiversity and food security: the valuable role of agrobiodiversity for sustainable agriculture. Int Aff 76:283-297.

TILMAN, D. 1994. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2-16.

TRIGO, E. 2005 Consecuencias económicas de la transformación agrícola. Ciencia Hoy 87:46-51

TSCHARNTKE, T; AM KLEIN, A KRUESS, I STEFFAN- DEWENTER & C THIES. 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857-874.

WEYLAND, F; SL POGGIO & CM GHERSA. 2008. Agricultura y Biodiversidad. Ciencia Hoy 106:27-35.

Downloads

Published

2009-04-01

How to Cite

Aizen, M. A., Garibaldi, L. A., & Dondo, M. (2009). Soybean expansion and agriculture diversity in Argentina. Ecología Austral, 19(1), 045–054. Retrieved from https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1367

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2009)

Section

Articles

License

Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.