Pollinator richness, pollination and plant reproduction are analyzed in a fragmentation gradient of the Chaco forests of Córdoba, Argentina

Authors

  • Leonardo Galetto Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal – CONICET, Univ. Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Ramiro Aguilar Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal – CONICET, Univ. Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Mariana Musicante Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal – CONICET, Univ. Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Julia Astegiano Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal – CONICET, Univ. Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Ana Ferreras Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal – CONICET, Univ. Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Mariana Jausoro Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal – CONICET, Univ. Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Carolina Torres Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal – CONICET, Univ. Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Lorena Ashworth Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal – CONICET, Univ. Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Cecilia Eynard Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal – CONICET, Univ. Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.

Keywords:

Chaco region, communities, habitat fragmentation, meta-analysis, pollination

Abstract

We expect to find direct relationships between pollinator richness, these two processes and the area of the fragments. Considering data obtained by many researchers for different forest sites, the following objectives were planned: i) to evaluate the relationship between fragment area, pollinator richness and pollination (measure as frequency of visits to the flowers), ii) to analyze at the species level the response patterns of variables related to the pollination (pollinator richness or frequency of visits) and reproduction (i.e., fruit production) processes within a gradient of fragmentation for many plants, iii) to compare trends obtained using different methodologies, and iv) to discuss results in the context of biodiversity conservation. Contrarily to our expectations, direct relationships between fragment area and pollinator richness or frequency of floral visits were not found. On the other hand, results obtained for pollinator richness and fruit set by meta- analyses showed significant overall fragment size effect. The frequency of visits, on the contrary, did not show a significant overall size effect. The trends observed using the two methodologies were not uniform. Pollinator and plant responses to fragmentation seem to be more complex than what was originally predicted. If the heterogeneity of trends found for many species within a fragmentation gradient is analyzed, a species-specific susceptibility is suggested. In addition, many species have showed variability among seasons in their tendencies within the gradient of fragmentation. When discussing conservation politics of the Chaco forests of Córdoba, it would be interesting to analyze those plant species and their pollinators that seem to be affected negatively by reduction of fragment size.

References

ADAMS, DC; J GUREVITCH & MS ROSENBERG. 1997. Using randomization techniques to analyze behavioural data. An. Behav. 51:733-738.

AGUILAR, R. 2005. Efectos de la fragmentación del hábitat sobre el éxito reproductivo de especies nativas del Bosque Chaqueño Serrano de Córdoba. Tesis Doctoral. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.

AGUILAR, R & L GALETTO. 2004. Effects of forest fragmentation on male and female reproductive success in Cestrum parqui (Solanaceae). Oecologia 138:513-520.

AGUILAR, R; L ASHWORTH; L GALETTO & MA AIZEN. 2006. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 9:968-980.

AIZEN, MA & P FEINSINGER. 1994. Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology 75:330-351.

ASHWORTH, L. 2004. Variabilidad espacio-temporal en el éxito reproductivo de plantas leñosas del Bosque Chaqueño Serrano. Tesis Doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias Exáctas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.

ASHWORTH, L; R AGUILAR; L GALETTO & M AIZEN. 2004 Why do pollination generalist and specialist plant species show similar reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation? J. Ecol. 92:717-719.

BHATTACHARY, AM; RB PRIMACK & J GERWEIN. 2003. Are roads railroads barriers to bumblebee movement in a temperate suburban conservation area? Biol. Conserv. 109:37-45.

CANE, JH. 2001. Habitat fragmentation and native bees: a premature veredict? Conserv. Ecol. 5:3.

FAHRIG, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34:487-515.

FISHER, M & D MATTHIES. 1998. Effects of population size on performance in the rare plant Gentianella germanica. J. Ecol. 86:195-204.

GAVIER, GI & EH BUCHER. 2004. Deforestación de las Sierras Chicas de Córdoba (Argentina) en el período 1970 - 1997. Miscelánea No 101. Academia Nacional de Ciencias (Córdoba).

GOVERDE, M; K SCHWEIZER; B BAUR & A ERHARDT. 2002. Small-scale habitat fragmentation effects on pollinator behaviour: experimental evidence from the bumblebee Bombus veteranus on calcareous grasslands. Biol. Conserv. 104:293-299.

GUREVITCH, J & LV HEDGES. 1999. Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 80:1142-1149. HEDGES, LV & I OLKIN. 1985. Statistical methods for Meta-analysis. Academic Press, New York.

HENLE, K; DB LINDENMAYER; CR MARGULES; DA SAUNDERS & C WISSEL. 2004. Species survival in fragmented landscapes: where are we now? Biodiv. Conserv. 13:1-8.

HOBBS, RJ & CJ YATES. 2003. Impacts of ecosystem fragmentation on plant populations: generalizing the idiosyncratic. Austr. J. Bot. 51:471-488.

JACQUEMYN, H; J BUTAYE & M HERMY. 2001. Forest plant species richness in small, fragmented mixed deciduous forest patches: the role of area, time and dispersal limitation. J. Biogeogr. 28:801-812.

JULES, ES. 1998. Habitat fragmentation and demographic change for a common plant: Trillium in old-growth forest. Ecology 79:1645-1656.

JULES, ES & P SHAHANI. 2003. A broader ecological context to habitat fragmentation: Why matrix habitat is more important than we thought. J. Veg. Sci. 14:459-464.

KEARNS, CA; DW INOUYE & NM WASER. 1998. Endangered mutualisms: The conservation of plant- pollinator interactions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29:83-112.

LENNARTSSON, T. 2002. Extinction thresholds and disrupted plant-pollinator interactions in fragmented plant populations. Ecology 83:3060-3072.

LIENERT, J. 2004. Habitat fragmentation effects on fitness of plant populations – a review. J. NatureConserv. 12:53-72.

LOVEJOY, TE; RO BIERREGAARD; JR RYLANDS; JR MALCOM; et al. 1986. Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. Pp. 257-285 in: ME Soule (ed), Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

MORALES, LC & L GALETTO. 2003. Influence of compatibility system and life form on plant reproductive success. Plant Biol. 5:1-7.

MORATO, EF. 2003. Biologia de Megachile (Austromegachile) orbiculata Mitchell (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) em matas contínuas e fragmentos na Amazonia Central. En: G. A. R. Melo & A. Dos Santos (eds). Apoidea Neotropica: Homenagem aos 90 anos de Jesus Santiago Mour. Editora UNESC, Criciúma.

MORATO, EF & LA CAMPOS. 2000. Efeitos da fragmentacao florestal sobre vespas e abelhas solitárias em uma área da Amazonia Central. Rev. Zool. 17: 429-444.

NOSS, RF & AY COOPERRIDER. 1994. Saving nature’s legacy: protecting and restoring biodiversity. Island Press, Washington.

OSBORNE, JL & IH WILLIAMS. 2001. Site constancy of bumble bees in an experimentally patchy habitat. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 83:129-141.

POWELL, AH & GVN POWELL. 1987. Population dynamics of male euglossine bees in Amazonian forest fragments. Biotropica 19:176-179.

RATHCKE, BJ & ES JULES. 1993. Habitat fragmentation and plant-pollinator interactions. Curr. Sci. 65:273-277.

RAUDENBUSH, SW. 1994. Random effects models. Pp. 301-321, in Cooper H & LV Hedges (eds) The handbook of research systhesis. Russell Sage foundation, New York.

ROSENBERG, MS; DC ADAMS & J GUREVITCH. 2000. MetaWin: Statistical Sofware for Meta-analysis. Version 2.0 Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

ROSENTHAL, R. 1991. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

SAUNDERS, DA; RJ HOBBS & CR MARGULES. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv. Biol. 5:18-32.

STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I. 2003. Importance of habitat area and landscape context for species richness of bees and wasps in fragmented orchard meadows. Conserv. Biol. 17:1036-1044.

STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I & T TSCHARNTKE. 1999. Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia 121:432-440

STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I & T TSCHARNTKE. 2000. Butterfly community structure in fragmented habitats. Ecol. Lett. 3:449-456.

STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I & T TSCHARNTKE. 2002. Insect communities and biotic interactions on fragmented calcareous grasslands-a mini review. Biol. Conserv. 104:275-284.

STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I; U MÜNZENBERG; C BÜRGER; C THIES & T TSCHARNTKE. 2002. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421-1432.

STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I; A KLEIN; V GAEBELE; T ALFERT & T TSCHARNTKE. 2006. Bee diversity and plant-pollinator interactions in fragmented landscapes. Pp.387-405 in: Waser NM & J Ollerton (eds). Plant-Pollinator Interactions from specialization to generalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

TORRES, C. 2003. Ecología reproductiva de Asteraceae nativas de Argentina central. Tesis Doctoral. Facultad de Ciencias Exáctas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.

VAN DYCK, H & E MATTHYSEN. 1999. Habitat fragmentation and insect flight: a changing “design” in a changing landscape? Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:172-174.

WESTPHAL, C & I STEFFAN-DEWENTER. 2006. Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence. Oecologia 149:289-300.

WILSON, EO. 1992. The diversity of life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

YAO, J; RD HOLT; PM RICH & WS MARSHALL. 1999. Woody plant colonization in an experimentally fragmented landscape. Ecography 22:715-728.

ZAK, M; MR CABIDO & J HODGSON. 2004. Do subtropical seasonal forests in the Gran Chaco, Argentina, have a future? Biol. Conserv. 120:589-598.

ZAR, JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Published

2007-06-01

How to Cite

Galetto, L., Aguilar, R., Musicante, M., Astegiano, J., Ferreras, A., Jausoro, M., Torres, C., Ashworth, L., & Eynard, C. (2007). Pollinator richness, pollination and plant reproduction are analyzed in a fragmentation gradient of the Chaco forests of Córdoba, Argentina. Ecología Austral, 17(1), 067–080. Retrieved from https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1423

Issue

Section

Special Section