Riparian wildlife richness along the Luján River

Authors

  • M. Laura Guichón CONICET - Grupo de Estudios en Etología y Ecología de Mamíferos (GEMA), departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Nacional de Luján, Luján, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Marcelo H. Cassini CONICET - Grupo de Estudios en Etología y Ecología de Mamíferos (GEMA), departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Nacional de Luján, Luján, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Organización PROFAUNA.

Keywords:

landscape scale, Pampas region, riparian mammals, waterfowl

Abstract

Riparian environments are usually characterized by high biological diversity, however, habitat degradation results from intensive use of the bank and the water course, and exploitation of the surrounding land. The Luján River basin, located in East-central Argentina, shows two distinct geomorphologic portions: the Pampean and the Deltaic portions, which in turn can be subdivided based on physiographic and land use features. Our objective was to compare riparian wildlife richness among the three zones of the Pampean portion (upper, middle, and lower), and between the two zones of the Deltaic portion (protected and antropic). From March to October 1997, 82 transects were randomly placed along the banks of the Luján River. We surveyed the presence of coypus, capybara, and Neotropical river otter based on signs of activity, and the presence of water birds (non Passeriformes) based on direct observation. In the Pampean portion, the number of species per transect in the middle zone was significantly lower than in the upper and lower zones. The middle zone is characterized by a narrow alluvial plain associated with more intense use of the land and less availability of water and hydrophilic vegetation in the surrounding habitats than the other two zones. In the Deltaic portion, the protected zone showed a larger species richness than the antropic zone, where intense use of the river and modification of its bank can negatively affect wildlife.

References

BÁRBARO, NO. 1994. Perfil ambiental de la Argentina. XIX Asamblea General de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

BISSONETTE, JA. 1997. Wildlife and landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

BO, R; R QUINTANA; J MERLER; P MINOTTI; I MALVAREZ & G DE VILLAFAÑE. 1992. Problems in the conservation of mammlas in the Lower Delta region of the Paraná river in Argentina. Evaluation of the current situation using a combined methodology. Pp. 143-152 in: Proceedings of the Workshop “Mammals in the development countries. A new approach” held at the 5th Theriological Congress in Rome, Italy. Noragic Occasional Papers Series C, Development and Environment No 11.

CABRERA, AL. 1971. Fitogeografía de la República Argentina. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica, 14:1-42.

DANIELE, C; D RÍOS; M DE PAULA & A FRASSETTO. 2006. Impacto y riesgo de la expansión urbana sobre valles de inundación en la Región Metropolitana de Buenos Aires. Pp. 457-461 in: La situación ambiental argentina 2005. A Brown., U Martínez Ortíz, M Acerbi & J Corcuera (eds.). Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

DNFS. 1992. Dossier sobre la importancia económica actual de los productos más habituales comercializados de la Fauna Silvestre. Dirección Nacional de Fauna Silvestre, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

GILLER, PS & B MALMQVIST. 1998. The biology of streams and rivers. Oxford University Press, New York.

GOLDBERG, S; I CIRERA; M PARELLA; A BENITEZ; L BULOS & A TRONCOSO. 1995. Caracterización climática y agroclimática de la cuenca del Río Luján. Pp. 13-19 in: Proceedings of Jornadas sobre la Cuenca del Río Luján. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Luján, Argentina.

GOSLING, LM & SJ BAKER. 1991. Family Myocastoridae. Pp. 267-275 in: The Handbook of British Mammals. G. B. Corbet and S. Harris (eds.). Second edition. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.

GUICHÓN, ML; M ANGELINI; A BENÍTEZ; C SERAFINI & MH CASSINI. 1999. Caracterización ambiental de la cuenca del río Luján. Revista de Teledetección (España), 11:5-12.

GUICHÓN, ML. 2003. Distribución espacial, comportamiento y estructura de poblaciones de coipo Myocastor coypus en la cuenca del río Luján (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Ph. D. Thesis, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

HAWKINS, CP. 1994. What are riparian ecosystems and why are we worried about them?, Natural Resources and Environmental Issues. Utah. Proceedings of the Symposium Riparian Resources, Utah State University. 89 pp.

HOLDO, R & J GARCÍA FERNÁNDEZ. 1995. Identificación de prioridades para la conservación y manejo de la fauna silvestre argentina. Fundación para la Conservación de las Especies y el Medio Ambiente, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

MASON, C & S MACDONALD. 1986. Otters: ecology and conservation. Cambridge University Press, London.

MERLER, J; R BÓ; R QUINTANA & A MALVAREZ. 1994. Habitat studies at different spatial scales for multiple conservation goals in the Paraná River Delta (Argentina). International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 20:149-162.

PARERA, A. 1994. Las ‘nutrias verdaderas’ de la Argentina. Boletín Técnico de la Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, 21:1-37.

PUTH, LM & KA WILSON. 2001. Boundaries and corridors as a continuum of ecological flow control: lessons from rivers and streams. Conservation Biology, 15:21-30.

QUINTANA, R; R BÓ; J MERLER; P MINOTTI & A MALVAREZ. 1992. Situación y uso de la fauna silvestre en la Región del Bajo Delta del Río Paraná (Argentina). Iheringia, Serie Zoologica, 73:13-33.

QUINTANA, R. 1996. Análisis y evaluación de la aptitud de hábitat del carpincho (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris) en relación con la heterogeneidad del paisaje y las interacciones con el ganado doméstico. Ph. D. thesis, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

RASMUSSEN, GA & W PADGETT. 1994. Recreational effects on riparian areas, Natural Resources and Environmental Issues. Utah. Proceedings of the Symposium Riparian Resources, Utah State University. 83 pp.

SAUNDERS, DA & RJ HOBBS. 1991. Nature conservation 2. The role of corridors. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, New South Wales.

STOTZ, DF; JW FITZPATRICK; TA PARKER III & DK MOSKOVITS. 1996. Neotropical Birds: Ecology and conservation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

STRAHLER, AH & AN STRAHLER. 1992. Modern physical geography (fourth edition). John Wiley & Sons, New York.

WEAR, DN; MG TURNER & RJ NAIMAN. 1998. Land cover along an urban-rural gradient: implications for water quality. Ecological Applications, 8:619- 630.

WIENS JA; NC STENSETH; B VAN HORNE & RA IMS. 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos, 66:369-380.

ZACAGNINI, ME & JJ VENTURINO. 1993. La fauna silvestre en el contexto agropecuario entrerriano: problemáticas y necesidades de investigación para su adecuado manejo. INTA Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná Serie Misceláneas 9, Argentina.

ZAR, JH. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. Second edition. Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey.

Downloads

Published

2007-06-01

How to Cite

Guichón, M. L., & Cassini, M. H. (2007). Riparian wildlife richness along the Luján River. Ecología Austral, 17(1), 081–087. Retrieved from https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1424

Issue

Section

Articles