Impact of different anthropogenic disturbances on bird communities of Nothofagus antarctica forests and shrublands in NW Patagonia

Authors

  • María V. Lantschner INTA EEA Bariloche, Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.
  • Verónica Rusch INTA EEA Bariloche, Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.

Keywords:

andean-patagonic forests, land uses, exotic coniferous plantations, grazing, wood extraction, biodiversity, conservation, sustainable management

Abstract

To be able to plan productive uses of the land compatible with the conservation of the biodiversity, it is essential to evaluate the changes that they cause. The Andean patagonic forests undergo different anthropogenic disturbances, like fires, grazing, wood extraction and substitution by exotic coniferous plantations. These activities cause changes on the vegetation and animal communities, and could be affecting the functioning of the forest ecosystems. In Argentine Patagonia, there is a growing opposition to productive activities, particularly to pine plantations, because of its supposed negative ecological consequences, however their impacts are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate in which measure different uses of the vegetation of the basin of Foyel river (NO Argentine Patagonia) cause changes on bird communities, especially on the functionally important and the endangered species. Birds counts were conducted from November 2004 to March 2005 (summer) using the variable circular-plot method, in twenty four sites of Nothofagus antarctica native forests and scrubs with different levels of grazing and wood extraction (closed, semiopened, opened), and in eight exotic plantations of Pseudotsuga menziesii and Pinus spp. Although, the vegetation structure of each site was characterized, to identify structural elements of the forests that could be important for bird habitat. Population densities of birds did not differ between vegetation types (25.4 ± 8.4 individuals/ha) associated to different disturbances. Bird richness and diversity (Shannon Index), however, were different among the vegetation types, in forestations both were similar to the undisturbed vegetation types, whereas they increased in vegetations with a medium intensity of wood extraction and grazing, and were highest in those sites whit a high intensity of wood extraction and grazing. A Canonical Correspondence Analysis and an analysis of species composition similarity showed that there are two differentiated communities: those of the more altered N. antarctica forests (by grazing and wood extraction), dominated by birds of opened areas; and another community in the rest of the vegetation types, dominated by species characteristic of forests. Among the key species for the Andean patagonic forests processes, foliage insectivores (Elaenia albiceps and Aphrastura spinicauda) were not seriously affected by any of the anthropogenic disturbances; ground insectivores (Scelorchilus rubecula and Pteroptochos tarnii) used the coniferous plantations, but not the areas opened by intense wood extraction and grazing; whereas the wood insectivore species (Campephilus magellanicus) was rare in all types of vegetation. Our results suggest that the structure and composition of the forest bird communities is mainly determined by changes in the structure of the vegetation, and not by changes in the floristic composition. The bird community of the coniferous plantations is similar to the community of the original systems. Intensive wood extraction and grazing, however, cause great changes, incorporating some species to the area, but eliminating others that are forest dependent.

References

AIZEN, M; N BONINO; J CORLEY; C CHEHÉBAR; H GONDA; ET AL. 1999. Empleo de Criterios e Indicadores en el Manejo Forestal Sustentable: Biodiversidad. Parte II: La aplicación a los bosques Andino Patagónicos. Actas Segundas Jornadas Iberoamericanas sobre Diversidad Biológica, San Luis, Argentina.

APLET, G; N JOHNSON; J OLSON & V ALARIC SAMPLE. 1993. Defining sustainable forestry. The Island Press.

BARROS, VR; VH CORDON; CL MOYANO; RJ MÉNDEZ; JC FORQUERA & O PIZZIO. 1983. Cartas de Precipitación de la zona oeste de las Provincias de Río Negro y Neuquén: Primera contribución. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

TER BRAAK, CJF. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, 67:1167-1179.

CABRERA, A. 1976. Regiones Fitogeográficas Argentinas. Enciclopedia Argentina de Agricultura y Jardinería. Ed. ACME S.A.C.I. Buenos Aires. 85 pp.

CARLSON, A. 1986. A Comparison of Birds Inhabiting Pine Plantation and Indigenous Forest Patches in a Tropical Mountain Area. Biological Conservation, 35:195-204.

CARNUS, JM; J PARROTTA; EG BROCKERHOFF; M ARBEZ; H JACTEL; ET AL. 2006. Planted Forests and Biodiversity. Journal of Forestry, 104:65-77.

CASTELLÓN, TD. & KE SIEVING. 2006. An experimental test of matrix permeability and corridor use by an endemic understory bird. Conservation Biology, 20:135-145.

CHAO, A. 1984. Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 11:265-270.

CHRISTIE, MI, EJ RAMILO & MD BETTINELLI. 2004. Aves del Noroeste Patagónico: Atlas y Guía. L.O.L.A. Buenos Aires. 328 pp.

CLOUT, MN & PD GAZE. 1984. Effects of Plantation Forestry on Birds in New Zealand. Journal of Applied Ecology, 21:795-815.

DÍAZ, M; R CARBONELL; T SANTOS & JL TELLERÍA. 1998. Breeding bird communities in pine plantations of the Spanish plateaux: biogeography, landscape and vegetation effects. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35:562.

DRISCOLL, PV. 1977. Comparison of Bird Counts from Pine Forests and Indigenous Vegetation. Aust. Wildl. Res., 4:281-288.

DYTHAM, C. 2003. Choosing and Using Statistics: A Biologist’s Guide. Blackwell. U. K.

ESTADES CF. 1994. Impacto de la sustitución del bosque natural por plantaciones de Pinus radiata sobre una comunidad de aves en la Octava Región de Chile. Boletín Chileno de Ornitología, 1:8-14.

ESTADES, CF & S TEMPLE. 1999. Deciduous-Forest bird communities in a fragmented landscape dominated by exotic pine plantations. Ecological Applications, 9:573-585.

GJERDE, I & M SAETERSDAL. 1997. Effects on avian diversity of introduced Spruce Picea spp. plantations in the native pine Pinus sylvestris forests of western Norway. Biological Conservation, 79:241-250.

GONZÁLEZ-GÓMEZ, PL; CF ESTADES & JA SIMONETTI. 2006. Strengthed insectivory in a temperate fragmented forest. Oecologia, 148:137-143.

GRIGERA, D; C ÚBEDA & A RECA. 1996. Estado de Conservación de las aves del Parque y Reserva Nacional Nahuel Huapi. Hornero, 14:1-13.

HAMMER, O; DAT HARPER; PD RYAN. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontol. Electron, 4:1-9.

IUCN 2006. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. www.iucnredlist.org.

LACLAU, P. 1997. Los Ecosistemas Forestales y el Hombre en el Sur de Chile y Argentina. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina,. Boletín Técnico No 34.

LEBERTON, P & B PONT. 1987. Avifaune et altérations forestières. Acta Oecologica, 8:227-235.

LINDENMAYER, D.B.; J.F. FRANKLIN Y J. FISCHER. 2006. General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 131: 433-445.

MAGURRAN, AE. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

MANACORDA, M Y G BONVISSUTO. 2001. Uso silvopastoril de ñire (Nothofagus antarctica) en Río Negro, Patagonia Argentina. Revista Forestal Centroamericana 35:41-44.

MILLER, K.R. 1996. Conserving Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes. in: Szaro, R.C. y D. Johnson. Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, New York.

NAROSKY, T & M BABARKSAS. 2000. Aves de la Patagonia: Guía para su reconocimiento. Vázquez Mazzini Editores, Bs. As., Argentina. 127 pp.

NOSS, R. Y A.Y. COOPERRIDER. 1994. Saving natures legacy: Projecting and restoring biodiversity. Defenders of Wildlife and Island Press, Washington.

PARITSIS, J. 2002. Efectos de las Plantaciones de Coníferas Exóticas sobre el Ensamble de Plantas Vasculares, Coleópteros Epigeos y Aves del Bosque de Nothofagus dombeyi. Tesis de Licenciatura en Ciencias Biológicas. Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Argentina.

RALPH, CJ. 1985. Habitat Association Patterns of Forest and Steppe Birds of Northern Patagonia, Argentina. The Condor, 87: 471-483.

REYNOLDS, RT; JM SCOTT & RA NUSSBAUM. 1980. A variable circular-plot for estimating bird numbers. Condor, 82:309-313.

RUSCH, V; M SARASOLA & T SCHLICHTER. 2005. Indicadores de Biodiversidad en Bosques de Nothofagus. IDIA XII, 8:8-14.

RYMER, L. 1981. Pine Plantations in Australia as Habitat for Native Animals. Environmental Conservation, 8:95-96.

SANTOS, T, JL TELLERÍA & R CARBONELL. 2002. Bird conservation in fragmented Mediterranean forsts of Spain: effects of geographical location, habitat and landscape degradation. Biological Conservation, 105:113-125.

SCHLICHTER, T, LACLAU P. 1998. Ecotono estepa-bosque y plantaciones en la Patagonia norte. Ecología Austral 8:285-296.

SIEVING, KE; MF WILLSON & TL DE SANTO. 1996. Habitat barriers to movement of understory birds in South-temperate rainforest. Auk, 113:944-949.

SOKAL, RR & ROHLF, FJ. 1981. Biometry. Freeman. San Francisco, USA. 815 pp.

THOMAS, L; JL LAAKE; S STRINDBERG; FFC MARQUES; ST AUCKLAND; ET AL. 2003. Distance 4.1. Release 1.Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St. Andrews, UK. http://www.ruwpa.st-and.ac.uk/distance/.

ÚBEDA, C & D GRIGERA. 1995. Recalificación del estado de Conservación de la Fauna Silvestre Argentina. Región Patagónica. Secretaría de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente Humano. Consejo Asesor Regional Patagónico de la Fauna Silvestre. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 94 pp.

VERGARA, PM & JA SIMONETTI. 2004. Avian responses to fragmentation of the Maulino Forest in central Chile. Oryx, 38:383-388.

VUILLEUMIER, F. 1972. Bird species diversity in Patagonia (Temperate South America). The American Naturalist, 106:266-271.

WILLIS, B. 1914. El norte de la Patagonia. Comisión de Estudios Hidrológicos, Ministerio de Obras Públicas. EUDEBA. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 500 pp.

WILLSON, MF; T DE SANTO; C SABAG & JJ ARMESTO. 1994. Avian Communities of Fragmented South-Temperated Rainforests in Chile. Conservation Biology, 8:508-520.

Published

2007-06-01

How to Cite

Lantschner, M. V., & Rusch, V. (2007). Impact of different anthropogenic disturbances on bird communities of Nothofagus antarctica forests and shrublands in NW Patagonia. Ecología Austral, 17(1), 099–112. Retrieved from https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1426

Issue

Section

Articles