Effects of nest box size on the nesting and renesting pattern of Aphrastura spinicauda and Troglodytes aedon

Authors

  • Pablo M. Vergara Departamento de Ecología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Keywords:

nesting, renesting probability, nest box use

Abstract

Using large and small nest boxes I determined the effect of the nest box size upon nesting and renesting probability, as well as the reproductive success of two secondary cavity nesters, the thorn-tailed rayadito (Aphrastura spinicauda) and the house wren (Troglodytes aedon) was determined comparing large and small boxes. In order to assess these effects nest boxes were monitored by two consecutive years. Results indicated that Aphrastura nested mainly in the large instead of the small nest boxes, and nesting Troglodytes used primarily small nest boxes. Nevertheless, the renesting pattern of both species, including renesting attempts after successful fledging and after nest failure, was not affected by nest box size and the probability of renesting was not influenced by the success of previous reproductive events. The size of the nest box did not affect the reproductive success of both species when they nested or re-nested, in spite of the weight of the nest was increased with the size of the nest box. These results apparently are not supported by limitation by space, costs of nest building or the presence and behavior of the nest predator and parasites. Nevertheless, since Troglodytes has the potential to usurp cavities used by other species of birds, I suggest implementing monitoring programs for Aphrastura using both large and small nest boxes in order to avoid the use of large nest boxes by Troglodytes.

References

AITKEN, KEH; KL WIEBE & K MARTIN. 2002. Nest-site reuse patterns for a cavity-nesting bird community in interior British Columbia. Auk, 119: 391-402.

ALATALO, RV; A CARLSON & A LUNDBERG. 1988 Nest cavity size and clutch size of Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca breeding in natural tree-holes. Ornis Scandinavica, 19: 317–319.

ALWORTH, T & IBR SCHEIBER. 2000. Nest building in house wrens (Troglodytes aedon): a reexamination of male and female roles. J. Field Ornithol., 71: 409-414.

BEAUCOURNU, JC; P VERGARA; BALBOA; DA GONZALEZ-ACUNA. 2006. A new bird-flea from Chile (Siphonaptera : Ceratophyllidae). Journal de la Société Française de Parasitologie 13: 227-230.

BELLES-ISLES, JC & J PICMAN. 1986. House Wren nest-destroying behavior. Condor, 88: 190-193.

CONRAD, KF & RJ ROBERTSON. 1993. Clutch size in Eastern Phoebes (Sayornis phoebe). I. The cost of nest building. Can. J. Zool., 71: 1003–1007.

DOBSON, AJ. 1990. An introduction to generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London.

GAUTHIER, M & DW THOMAS. 1993. Nest site selection and the cost of nest building by Cliff Swallows (Hirundo pyrrhonota). Can. J. Zool., 71: 1120–1123.

JOHNSON, LS. 1996. Removal of old nest material from the nesting sites of house wrens: effects on nest site attractiveness and ectoparasite loads. J. Field Ornithol., 67: 212-221.

KARLSSON J & SG NILSSON. 1977. The influence of nest-box area on clutch size in some hole-nesting passerines. Ibis, 119: 207-211.

KENNEDY, ED & DW WHITE. 1992. Nest building in House Wrens. J. Field Ornithology, 63: 35–42.

MAZGAJSKI, TD. 2003. Nest site choice in relation to the presence of old nests and cavity depth in the starling Sturnus vulgaris. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution 15: 273-281.

MOED, A & DG DAWSON. 1979. Breeding of starlings in nest boxes of various types. New Zealand J. Zoology, 6: 613–618.

MORENO, J; S MERINO; RA VÁSQUEZ & JJ ARMESTO. 2005. Breeding biology of the thorn-tailed rayadito (furnariidae) in south-temperate rainforests of Chile. Condor, 107: 69–77.

MUÑOZ-PEDREROS, A; A GANTZ & M SAAVEDRA. 1996. Nidos artificiales en plantaciones de Pinus radiata en el sur de Chile: ¿una herramienta para mitigar impactos ambientales negativos? Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 69: 393-400.

NEWTON, I. 1998. Population limitation in birds. Academic Press, New York, USA.

PURCELL, KL; J VERNER & LW ORING 1997. A comparison of the breeding ecology of birds nesting in boxes and tree cavities. Auk, 114: 646-656.

RENDELL, WB & RJ ROBERTSON. 1989. Nest-site characteristics, reproductive success and cavity availability for Tree Swallows breeding in natural cavities. Condor, 91: 875–885.

RENDELL, WB & RJ ROBERTSON. 1993. Cavity size, clutch size and the breeding ecology of Tree Swallows, Tachycineta bicolor. Ibis, 135: 305-310.

RENDELL, WB & NAM VERBEEK. 1996. Old nest material in nest boxes of Tree Swallows: effects on reproductive success. Condor, 98: 142–152.

SLAGSVOLD, T. 1989. On the evolution of clutch size and nest size in passerine birds. Oecologia, 79: 300- 305.

STANBACK, MT & AA DERVAN. 2001. Within-season nest-site fidelity in eastern bluebirds: disentangling effects of nest success and parasite avoidance. Auk, 118: 743-745.

STANBACK, MT & EK ROCKWELL. 2003. Nest-site fidelity in eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis) depends on the quality of alternate cavities. Auk, 120: 1029- 1032.

STEPHENS, SE; RM KAMINSKI; BD LEOPOLD & PD GERARD. 1998. Reproduction of wood ducks in large and small nest boxes. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26: 159-167.

THOMPSON, CF & AJ NEILL. 1991. House Wrens do not prefer clean nest boxes. Animal Behaviour, 42: 1022-1024.

TOMASEVIC, JA & CF ESTADES. 2006. Stand attributes and the abundance of secondary cavity-nesting birds in southern beech (Nothofagus) forests in South-Central Chile. Ornitología Neotropical, 17:1-14.

TRIPET, F & H RICHNER. 1999. Dynamics of hen flea Ceratophyllus gallinae subpopulations in blue tit nests. Journal of insect behavior, 12: 159-174.

VERGARA PM & PA MARQUET. 2007. On the seasonal effect of landscape structure on a bird species: the thorn-tailed rayadito in a relict forest in northern Chile. Landscape Ecology, (online doi: 10.1007/s10980-007-9091-9).

WIEBE, KL & TL SWIFT. 2001. Clutch size relative to tree cavity size in Northern Flickers: J. Avian Biology, 32: 167-173.

Downloads

Published

2007-06-01

How to Cite

Vergara, P. M. (2007). Effects of nest box size on the nesting and renesting pattern of Aphrastura spinicauda and Troglodytes aedon. Ecología Austral, 17(1), 133–141. Retrieved from https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1429

Issue

Section

Articles