Soil seed bank of an Uruguayan grassland under different grazing practices

Authors

  • Federico Haretche Sección Ecología Terrestre, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
  • Claudia Rodríguez Sección Ecología Terrestre, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay

Keywords:

exclosure, functional group, C3 grasses, C4 grasses, temperate grassland, Uruguay

Abstract

We studied the persistent soil seed bank of an Uruguayan grassland under two grazing treatments: a continuously grazed area at moderate stocking rate, and an area excluded from domestic herbivores for 9 years. We also compared the composition of the soil seed bank with the aboveground vegetation using previous records of species frequency on the established vegetation. For the soil seed bank estimates, we used the seedling-emergence method. The seedlings were classified into four functional groups defined for the established vegetation: cool- season (C3) grasses, warm-season (C4) grasses, graminoids (sedges and rushes), and dicots. Under grazing, the soil seed bank density was significantly higher than in the exclosure and dominated by dicots (61% of the total seeds). Moreover, C3 and C4 grasses were scarcely registered (4 and 5% respectively). In the ungrazed area, the four groups were evenly represented. The level of similarity between the established vegetation and the soil seed bank in the grazed area was lower than in the exclosure. The differences between the soil seed banks may be explained by the differences in the aboveground species composition. The grazed area is dominated by C4 prostrate grasses which spread by means of rhizomes and stolons, and show a low seed output. A set of interstitial native forbs, that produce large quantities of seeds, constitute a subordinate group of the community. In the exclosure, the dominant species are replaced by erect C3 grasses that produce abundant inflorescences. The absence of herbivores also promoted canopy changes like the accumulation of a dense layer of litter that can act as a filter to the seeds, preventing their incorporation to the soil seed bank. This can explain the smaller size of the soil seed bank in the exclosure. Our results indicate that, in the soil seed bank, the different grazing conditions promote changes that are observable at the level of the functional groups defined for the established vegetation.

References

ALTESOR, A; E DI LANDRO; H MAY & E EZCURRA. 1998. Long-term species change in a Uruguayan grassland. J. Veg. Sci., 9:173-180.

ALTESOR, A; M OESTERHELD; E LEONI; F LEZAMA & C RODRÍGUEZ. 2005. Effect of grazing exclosure on community structure and productivity of a Uruguayan grassland. Plant Ecology, 179:83-91.

BASKIN, CC & JM BASKIN. 1998. Ecology of seed dormancy and germination in grasses. Pp. 30-83 In: GP Cheplick (ed.). Population Biology of Grasses. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.

BERTILLER, MB. 1996. Grazing effects on sustainable semiarid rangelands in Patagonia: the state and dynamics of the soil seed bank. Enviroment. Manag., 20:123-132.

BERTILLER, MB. 1998. Spatial patterns of the germinable soil seed bank in northern Patagonia. Seed Science Research, 8:39-45.

CAVERS, PB & DL BENOIT. 1989. Seed banks in arable lands. Pp. 309-328 in MA Leck; VT Parker & RL Simpson (eds). Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press. NY, USA.

CHANETON, EJ & JM FACELLI.1991. Disturbance effects on plant community diversity: spatial scales and dominance hierarchies. Vegetatio, 93:143-155.

CHRISTENSEN, M. 1981. Species diversity and dominance in fungal communities. Pp. 201-232 en DT Wicklow & GC Carroll (eds). The Fungal Community. Marcel Dekker. NY.,USA.

CRAWLEY, MJ. 1992. Seed predators and plant population dynamics. Pp. 157-191 in: M Fenner (ed.). Seeds. The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. C.A.B. International. Wallingford, UK.

D’ANGELA, E; JM FACELLI & E JACOBO. 1988. The role of the permanent soil seed bank in early stages of a post-agricultural succession in the Inland Pampa, Argentina. Vegetatio, 74:39-45.

DÍAZ, S; A ACOSTA & M CABIDO. 1992. Morphological analysis of herbaceous communities under different grazing regimes. J. Veg. Sci., 3:689-696.

FACELLI, JM. 1988. Response to grazing after nine years of cattle exclusion in a Flooding Pampa grassland, Argentina. Vegetatio, 78:21-25.

FACELLI, JM. 1994. Multiple indirect effects of plant litter affect the establishment of woody seedlings in old fields. Ecology, 75:1727-1735.

FACELLI, JM & E FACELLI. 1993. Interactions after death: plant litter controls priority effects in a successional plant community. Oecologia, 95:277-282.

FACELLI, JM; RJC LEÓN & VA DEREGIBUS. 1988. Community structure in grazed and ungrazed grassland sites in the Flooding Pampa, Argentina. Am. Midl. Nat., 121:125-133.

FACELLI, JM & STA PICKETT. 1991. Plant litter: light interception and effects on an old-field plant community. Ecology, 72:1024-1031.

FENNER, M. 1985. Seed Ecology. Chapman & Hall. London, UK.

FUNES, G; S BASCONCELO; S DÍAZ & M CABIDO. 2001. Edaphic patchiness influences grassland regeneration from the soil seed-bank in mountain grasslands of central Argentina. Austral Ecology, 26:205-212.

GRAHAM, DJ & MJ HUTCHINGS. 1988. Estimation of the seed bank of a chalk grassland ley established on former arable land. J. Appl. Ecol., 25:241-252.

HAYASHI, I & M NUMATA. 1971. Viable buried-seed population in the Miscanthus-and Zoysia-type grasslands in Japan: Ecological studies on the buried-seed population in the soil related to plant succession VI. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 20:243-252.

HOWE, CD & RJ CHANCELLOR. 1983. Factors affecting the viable seed content of soils beneath lowland pastures. J. Appl. Ecol., 20:915-922.

LAVOREL, S; S MC.INTYRE & K GRIGULIS. 1999. Plant response to disturbance in a Mediterranean grassland: How many functional groups? J. Veg. Sci., 10:661-672.

LUNT, ID. 1997. Germinable soil seed banks of anthropogenic native grasslands and grassy forest remnants in temperate south-eastern Australia. Plant Ecology, 130:21-34.

MARQUEZ, S; G FUNES; M CABIDO & E PUCHETA. 2002. Grazing effects on the germinable seed bank and standing vegetation in mountain grasslands from central Argentina. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat., 75:327-337.

MAYOR, MD; RM BOÓ; DV PELÁEZ & OR ELÍA. 2003. Seasonal variation of the soil seed bank of grasses in central Argentina as related to grazing and shrub cover. Journal of Arid Environments, 53:467-477.

MCINTYRE, S & S LAVOREL. 2001. Livestock grazing in subtropical pastures: steps in the analysis of attribute response and plant functional types. J.Ecol., 89:209-226.

MCNAUGHTON, SJ. 1983. Serengeti grassland ecology: the role of composite environmental factors and contingency in community organization. Ecol. Monogr., 53:291-320.

MCNAUGHTON, SJ. 1985. Ecology of a grazing ecosystem: The Serengeti. Ecol. Monogr., 55:259-94.

NOBLE, IR & H GITAY. 1996. A functional classification for predicting the dynamics of landscapes. J. Veg. Sci., 7:329-336.

O’CONNOR, TG & GA PICKETT. 1992. The influence of grazing on seed production and seed banks of some African savanna grasslands. J. Appl. Ecol., 29:247-260.

PARUELO, JM. 2001. Temperate Grasslands. (Pp.569- 574) in: T Munn (ed.). Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change. Vol. 2. John Wiley & Sons. Chichester.

PARUELO, JM & WK LAWENROTH. 1996. Relative abundance of plant functional types in grasslands and shrublands of Nort America. Ecol. Appl., 6:1212-1224.

ROBERTS, HA. 1981. Seed banks in soils. Advances in Applied Biology, 6:1-55.

RODRÍGUEZ, C; E LEONI; F LEZAMA & A ALTESOR. 2003. Temporal trends in species composition and plant traits in natural grasslands of Uruguay. J. Veg. Sci., 14:433-440.

ROSENGURTT, B. 1943. Estudios sobre praderas naturales del Uruguay. 3a contribución. Barreiro & Ramos. Montevideo, Uruguay.

ROSENGURTT, B; B ARRILLAGA DE MAFFEI & P IZAGUIRRE. 1970. Gramíneas Uruguayas. Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.

SALA, OE; M OESTERHELD; RJC LEON & A SORIANO. 1986. Grazing effects upon plant community structure in subhumid grasslands of Argentina. Vegetatio, 67:27-32.

STERNBERG, M; M GUTMAN; A PEREVOLOTSKY & J KIGEL. 2003. Effects of grazing on soil seed bank dynamics: An approach with functional groups. J. Veg. Sci., 14:375-386.

TEMPLETON, AR & DA LEVIN. 1979. Evolutionary consequences of seed pools. Am. Nat., 114:232-249.

TER HEERDT, GNJ; GL VERWEIJ; RM BEKKER & JP BAKKER. 1996. An improved method for seed-bank analysis: seedling emergence after removing the soil by sieving. Funct. Ecol., 10:144-151.

THOMPSON, K. 1992. The functional ecology of seed banks. Pp. 231-258 in: M Fenner (ed.). Seeds. The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. C.A.B. International. Wallingford, UK.

THOMPSON, K & JP GRIME. 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. J. Ecol., 67:893-921.

WILLIAMS, ED. 1984. Changes during 3 years in the size and composition of the seed bank beneath a long-term pasture as influenced by defoliation and fertilizer regime. J. Appl. Ecol., 21:603-615.

WOLDA, H. 1981. Similarity Indices, Sample Size and Diversity. Oecologia, 50:296-302.

Published

2006-12-01

How to Cite

Haretche, . F., & Rodríguez, C. (2006). Soil seed bank of an Uruguayan grassland under different grazing practices. Ecología Austral, 16(2), 105–113. Retrieved from https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1435

Issue

Section

Articles