Bark consumption of creosote bush (Larrea cuneifolia) by cuises (Microcavia australis): effect on branch survival and reproduction

Authors

  • Claudia M. Campos Grupo de Investigaciones de la Biodiversidad, IADIZA-CONICET, Mendoza, Argentina
  • Carlos E. Borghi Grupo de Investigaciones de la Biodiversidad, IADIZA-CONICET, Mendoza, Argentina. Museo de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan, Argentina
  • Stella M. Giannoni Grupo de Investigaciones de la Biodiversidad, IADIZA-CONICET, Mendoza, Argentina. Museo de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan, Argentina
  • Arnaldo Mangeaud Grupo de Investigaciones de la Biodiversidad, IADIZA-CONICET, Mendoza, Argentina
  • Marcelo F. Tognelli Laboratorio de Entomología, IADIZA, CRICYT, Mendoza, Argentina

Keywords:

Argentina, debarking, Monte desert, plant-animal interaction, plant condition, reproductive structures, rodent

Abstract

Locally, mammalian herbivores may have significant effects on the abundance and fitness of plant species. This study focuses on the interaction between cuises (Microcavia australis –Rodentia-) and creosote bush (Larrea cuneifolia –Zygophyllacea-), which is a widespread and ecologically dominant evergreen shrub in the Monte Desert of Argentina. Specifically, we examined the probability of plants being gnawed by cuises in relation to branch diameter and distance to cuis colonies. Additionally, we assessed the effect of gnawing by cuises on branch condition, production of flowers and fruits and branch survival. In general, gnawing by cuises negatively affects creosote bush plants. The likelihood of being gnawed is higher for branches of smaller diameter and in plants growing closer to cuis colonies. Also, cuises significantly affect the condition, production of reproductive structures and survival of creosote bush branches. This, in turn, may have a long-term effect on the spatial distribution of creosote bush plants in this ecosystem.

References

BARBOUR, MG; G CUNNINGHAM; WC OECHEL & SA BAMBERG. 1977. Growth and development, form and function. Pp. 48-91 in: TJ Mabry; JH Hunziker & DR DiFeo (eds). Creosote bush: biology and chemistry of Larrea in New World deserts. Hutchinson & Ross. Stroudsberg, Pennsylvania.

BAXTER, R & L HANSSON. 2001. Bark consumption by small rodents in the northern and southern hemispheres. Mammal Review 31:47-59.

BENTLEY, S; JB WHITTAKER & AJC MALLOCH. 1980. Field experiments on the effect of grazing by a Chrysomelid beetle (Gastrophysa viridula) on seed production and quality in Rumex obtusifolius and Rumex crispus. Journal of Ecology 68:671-674.

BORRUEL, N; CM CAMPOS; SM GIANNONI & CE BORGHI. 1998. Effects of herbivorous rodents (cavies and tuco-tucos) on a shrub community in the Monte Desert, Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments 39:33-37.

CABRERA, A. 1953. Los roedores Argentinos de la familia Caviidae. Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Publicación Escuela de Veterinaria 6:1-93.

CAMPOS, CM. 1997. Utilización de los recursos alimentarios por mamíferos medianos y pequeños del desierto del Monte. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.

CAMPOS, C; R OJEDA; S MONGE & M DACAR. 2001. Utilization of food resources by small and medium-sized mammals in the Monte Desert biome, Argentina. Austral Ecology 26:142-149.

COLEY, P; J BRYANT & F STUART CHAPIN. 1985. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895-899.

ENGLISH, EL & MA BOWERS. 1994. Vegetational gradients and proximity to woodchuck (Marmota monax) burrows in an old field. Journal of Mammalogy 75:775-780.

FUENTES, ER; FM JAKSIC & J SIMONETTI. 1983. European rabbits versus native rodents in Central Chile: effects on shrub seedlings. Oecologia 58:411-414.

GÓMEZ, JM. 1996. Predispersal reproductive ecology of an arid land crucifer, Moricandia moricardioides: effect of mammal herbivory on seed production. Journal of Arid Environments 33:425-431.

GREEN, TW & IG PALMBLAD. 1975. Effects of insect seed predators on Astragalus cibarius and Astraglaus utahensis (Leguminosae). Ecology 56:1435-1440.

HAWTHORNE, WR & PD HAYNE. 1978. Seed production and predispersal seed predation in the biennial composite species Arctium minus (Hill) Bernh and A. lappa L. Oecologia 34:283-295.

HUNTLY, NJ & RS INOUYE. 1988. Pocket gophers in ecosystems: pattern and mechanisms. Bioscience 38:786-793.

HUNTLY, NJ & OJ REICHMAN. 1994. Effects of subterranean mammalian herbivores on vegetation. Journal of Mammalogy 75:852-859.

LITTEL, RC; GA MILLIKEN; WW STROUP & RD WOLFINGER. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute. Cary, EEUU.

LONGLAND, WS. 1991. Risk of predation and food consumption by black-tailed jackrabbits. Journal of Rangeland Management 44:447-450.

MARES, M & A HULSE. 1977. Patterns of Some Vertebrate Communites in Creosote Bush Deserts. Pp. 209-226 in: TJ Mabry; JH Hunziker & DR DiFeo (eds). Creosote bush: biology and chemistry of Larrea in New World deserts. Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsberg, Pennsylvania.

MARQUIS, RJ. 1996. Plant architecture, sectoriality and plant tolerance to herbivores. Plant Ecology 127:85-97.

MONGE, S; M DACAR & V ROIG. 1994. Comparación de dietas de cuises en la Reserva de la Biósfera de Ñacuñán (Santa Rosa, Mendoza, Argentina). Vida Silvestre Neotropical 3:115-117.

MORELLO, J. 1958. La provincia fitogeográfica del Monte. Opera Lilloana 2:1-155.

MYSTER, RW & BC MC CARTHY. 1989. Effects of herbivory and competition on survival of Carya tomentosa (Juglandacea) seedlings. Oikos 56:145-148.

OSTEFLD, RS; N LEWIN; J SCHURR; ST PICKETT & CD CANHAM. 1994. The roles of small rodents in creating patchy environments. Polish Ecological Studies 20:265-276.

PLATT, WJ. 1975. The colonization and formation of equilibrium plant species associations on badger disturbances in a tall-grass prairie. Ecological Monographs 45:285-305.

RHOADES, DF & RG CATES. 1976. Towards a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry 10:168-213.

RITCHIE, ME & H OLFF. 1999. Herbivore diversity and plant dynamics: compensatory and additive effects. Pp. 175-204 in: H Olff; VK Brown & RH Drent (eds). Herbivores: between plants and predators. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford.

ROIG, FA. 1971. Flora y vegetación de la Reserva Forestal de Ñacuñán. Deserta 1:25-232.

ROOD, JP. 1970. Ecology and social behavior of the desert cavy (Microcavia australis). American Midlife Naturalist 83:415-454.

RUNDELL, PW; MR SHARIFI & A GONZALEZ-COLOMA. 1994. Resource availability and herbivory in Larrea tridentata. Pp. 105-114 in: M Arianoutsou & RH Groves (eds). Plant-animal interactions in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.

SIEGEL, S & NJ CASTELLAN, JR. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill Co. New York, USA.

SWIHART, RK. 1991. Influence of Marmota monax on vegetation fields. Journal of Mammalogy 72:791-795.

SWIHART, RK & PM PICONE. 1991. Effects of wood-chuck activity on woody plants near burrows. Journal of Mammalogy 72:607-611.

TOGNELLI, MF; CE BORGHI & CM CAMPOS. 1999. Effect of gnawing by Microcavia australis (Rodentia, Caviidae) on Geoffroea decorticans (Leguminosae) plants. Journal of Arid Environments 41:79-85.

TOGNELLI, MF; CM CAMPOS & RA OJEDA. 2001. Microcavia australis. Mammalian species 648:1-4.

TOGNELLI, MF; CM CAMPOS; RA OJEDA & VG ROIG. 1995. Is Microcavia australis (Rodentia:Caviidae) associated with a particular plant structure in the Monte desert of Argentina? Mammalia 59:327-333.

WATSON, MA. 1986. Integrated physiological units in plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1:119-162.

ZAR, JH. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, International Editions. New Jersey, USA.

Downloads

Published

2006-06-01

How to Cite

Campos, C. M., Borghi, C. E., Giannoni, S. M., Mangeaud, A., & Tognelli, M. F. (2006). Bark consumption of creosote bush (Larrea cuneifolia) by cuises (Microcavia australis): effect on branch survival and reproduction. Ecología Austral, 16(1), 001–006. Retrieved from https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1447

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2006)

Section

Articles

License

Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.