Vertical stratification of carpophilous beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) in forest fragments in the Southeastern of Brazil

Authors

  • Teresa T. Gonçalves Setor de Ecologia, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Brasil
  • Júlio N.C. Louzada Setor de Ecologia, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Brasil

Keywords:

biodiversity, canopy, forest fragmentation, community structure, insect ecology

Abstract

Fragmentation is one of the most important issues for conservation challenges. Habitat fragmentation results in the interruption of many biological processes that are essential for keeping the structure and functioning of natural ecosystems. The maintenance of habitat structure and its consequences in diversity is highly connected to spatial heterogeneity. There are many studies about spatial heterogeneity of habitats concerning horizontal effects; however, a new focus is given to vertical resource distribution, considering that half of the world’s biological diversity must be sheltered in the canopy. This study was conducted in 4 Atlantic forest fragments near the town of Lavras, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil, and its main objective was to analyze the diversity and vertical distribution of carpophylous beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) inside and between forest patches. At each forest fragment, beetles were sampled in 2 consecutive days, at 2 distinct points at least 50 m apart. Traps were baited with fermented banana and exposed for 24 h in 4 different strata of the canopy (1.5 m, 4.5 m, 7.5 m and 10.5 m high). A total of 1236 beetles were sampled (86 species from 19 families). The most diverse families were Nitidulidae (26.4% of the species), Staphylinidae (20.7%) and Cerambycidae (9.2%). We observed a significant difference in the vertical distribution of composition of species and structure of the analyzed communities, with the upper stratum presenting a higher species richness and relative abundance. Explanations for the distribution observed are discussed regarding the availability of food resources and microhabitat characteristics. Species distribution among fragments was not homogeneous, being probably the result of the differences present in areas, shapes and conservation levels of the sampled fragments.

References

AMEDEGNATO, C. 1997. Diversity of an Amazonian canopy grasshopper community in relation to resource partitioning and phylogeny. Pp. 281- 319 in: NE Stork, J Adis & RK Didham (ed.). Canopy Arthropods. Chapman & Hall. London, UK. 567 pp.

BASSET, Y. 1992a. Influence of leaf traits on the spatial distribution of arboreal arthropods within an overstorey rainforest tree. Ecological Entomology 17:8-16.

BASSET, Y. 1992b. Host specificity of arboreal and free-living insect herbivores in rain forests. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 47:115-133.

BASSET, Y. 1996. Local communities of arboreal herbivores in Papua New Guinea: Predictors of insect variables. Ecology 77(6):1906-1919.

BASSET, Y; E CHARLES; DS HAMMOND & VK BROWN. 2001. Short-term effects of canopy openness on insect herbivores in a rain forest in Guyana. Journal of Applied Ecology 38:1045–1058.

BASSET, Y; HP ABERLENC & G DELVARE. 1992. Abundance and stratification of foliage arthropods in a lowland rain forest of Cameroon. Ecological Entomology 17:310-318.

BASSET, Y; V NOVOTONY; SE MILLER & RL KITCHING. 2003. Canopy entomology, an expanding field of natural science. Pp. 4-6 in: Arthropods of tropical forests. Cambrigde University.

BIERREGAARD, RO (Jr); WF LAURANCE; C GASCON; J BENITEZ-MALVIDO; PM FEARNSIDE ET AL. 2001. Principles of forest fragmentation and conservation in the Amazon. Chapter 29. Pp. 371-385 in: Lessons From Amazonia – The Ecology and Conservation of a Fragmented Forest. Yale University.

BRASIL. 1992. Normas Climáticas (1961-1990). Ministério da Agricultura. Departamento Nacional de Meteorologia. Brasília. 132 pp.

COLWELL, RK. 1997. Estimate S: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Software Version 5.

DAVIS, A. J., J. HUIJBREGTS, A.H. KIRK-SPRIGGS, J. KRIKEN & S. L. SUTTON. 1997. The ecology and behaviour of arboreal dung beetles in Borneo, Pp. 417-432. In: N.E. Stork, J. Adis & R.K. Didham Editors, Canopy Arthropods. Chapman & Hall, London, 567 pp.

DAVIS, AJ & SL SUTTON. 1998. The effects of rainforest canopy loss on arboreal dung beetles in Borneo: implications for measurement of biodiversity in derived tropical ecosystems. Diversity and Distribution 4:167-173.

DESOUZA, O; JH SHOEROEDER; V BROWN & RO BIERREGAARD (Jr). 2001. A theoretical overview of the processes determining species richness in forest fragments. Chapter 2. Pp. 13-21 in: Lessons From Amazonia – The Ecology and Conservation of a Fragmented Forest. Yale University.

DIDHAM, RK; J GHAZOUL; NE STORK & AJ DAVIS. 1996. Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:255-260.

ERWIN, TL. 1991. How many species are there? Revisited. Conservation Biology 5:330–333.

ERWIN, TL. 1995. Measuring Arthropod Biodiversity in the Tropical Forest Canopy. Pp. 109-127 in: MD Lowman & NM Nadkarni (ed.). Forest Canopies. Academic Press. San Diego, USA.

GASCON, C; RO BIERREGAARD (Jr); WF LAURANCE & J RANKE. 2001. Deforestation and forest fragmentation in the Amazon. Chapter 3. Pp. 22-30 in: Lessons From Amazonia – The Ecology and Conservation of a Fragmented Forest. Yale University.

GASTON, KJ.1991. The magnitude of global insect species richness. Conservation Biology 5:283–296.

GAVILANES, ML & M BRANDÃO. 1991. Informações preliminares acerca da cobertura vegetal do município de Lavras, MG. Daphne 1:44-50.

GOTELLI, NJ & RK COLWELL. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4:379-391.

HART, DD & RJ HORWITZ. 1991. Habitat diversity and species-area relationship: alternative models and tests. Chapter 3. Pp. 47–68 in: SS Bell; ED McCoy; HR Mushinsky (ed.). Habitat Structure – The physical arrangement of objects in Space. Chapman and Hall.

HOLDOBLER, B & EO WILSON. 1990. The Ants. Belknap Press of the Harvard University. Cambrige, Mass.

LAURANCE, WF & RO BIERREGAARD (Jr). 1997. Tropical Forest Remnants – Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. The University of Chicago. Chicago, USA. 616 pp.

LAURANCE, WF; TE LOVEJOY; HL VASCONCELOS; EM BRUNA; RK DIDHAM ET AL. 2002. Ecosystem Decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: a 22-Year Investigation. Conservation Biology 16(3):605-618.

LEPSCH-CUNHA, N; C GASCON & P KAGEYAMA. 2001. The genetics of tropical trees – implication for conservation of demographically heterogeneous group. Chapter 8. Pp. 79-95 in: RO Bierregaard (Jr); C Gascon; TE Lovejoy & R Mesquita (ed.). Lessons From Amazonia – The Ecology and Conservation of a Fragmented Forest. Yale University.

LOPES, PP. 2000. A relação espécie-area em fragmentos florestais: testando hipóteses através das comunidades de coleópteros predadores (HISTERIDADE). Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Estadual Paulista. São Paulo, Brasil.

MAWDSLEY, NA & NE STORK. 1997. Host-specificity and the effective specialization of tropical canopy beetles. Pp. 104-130 in: NE Stork; J Adis & RK Didham (ed.). Canopy Arthropods. Chapman & Hall. London, UK. 567 pp.

MITCHELL, AW; K SECOY & T JACKSON. 2002. The Global Canopy Handbook – Techniques of access and study in the forest roof. GCP & The Ruffor Foundation. Oxford, UK. 248 pp.

MITTERMEIER, RA; N MYERS; PR GIL & CG MITTERMEIER. 1999. Hotsposts - The earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. CEMEX/Conservation International. Mexico. 431pp.

OZANNE, CMP; C HAMBLER; A FOGGO & MR SPEIGHT. 1997. The significance of edge effects in the management of forests for invertebrate biodiversity. Pp. 534-550 in: NE Stork; J Adis & RK Didham (ed.). Canopy Arthropods. Chapman & Hall. London, UK. 567 pp.

PEREIRA, JAA. 2003. Efeitos dos impactos ambientais e da heterogeneidade ambiental sobre a diversidade e estrutura da comunidade arbórea de 20 fragmentos de floresta semidecídua da região do Alto Rio Grande, Minas Gerais. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Brasil.

PIELOU, EC. 1984. The interpretation of ecological data. Witey. New York, USA.

RIEDE, K. 2002. Monitoring Biodiversity: Analysis of Amazonian rainforest sounds. Pp. 149-151 in: AW Mitchell; K Secoy; T Jackson (ed.). The Global canopy handbook – Techniques of access and study in the forest roof. GCP & The Ruffor Foundation. Oxford, UK. 248 pp.

STORK, NE; J ADIS & RK DIDHAM. 1997. Canopy Arthropods. Chapman & Hall. London, UK. 567pp.

VAZ-DE-MELLO, FZ & JNC LOUZADA. 1997. Considerações sobre forrageio arbóreo por Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae), e dados sobre sua ocorrência em floresta tropical do Brasil. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s) 72:55–61.

WINCHESTER, NN. 1997. The arboreal superhighway: arthropods and landscape dynamics. The Canadian Entomologist 129:595-599.

ZAR, JH. 1974. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall. Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, Dekaib, USA. 620 pp.

Downloads

Published

2005-06-01

How to Cite

Gonçalves, T. T., & Louzada, J. N. (2005). Vertical stratification of carpophilous beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) in forest fragments in the Southeastern of Brazil. Ecología Austral, 15(1), 101–110. Retrieved from https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1479

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2005)

Section

Articles

License

Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.