The importance of non epidermal tissues in microanalysis of herbivorous diet

Authors

  • Lorena Sepúlveda Plama Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche, San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
  • Alicia Pelliza Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche, San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
  • Marcela Manacorda Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche, San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina

Keywords:

microhistology, arid zones, xerophytic plants, quantification

Abstract

Generally in the microhistological analysis of the diet of herbivores, only epidermal tissues are considered. We worked with ten mixtures that contained a known weight of grasses, bushes, forbs and graminoids, to evaluate if considering identifiable non-epidermal tissues improves the results of diet analysis in arid environments. We made a census of 5 slides at 100 magnification for each mixture, recording all fragments: identifiable (epidermal and non-epidermal) and unidentifiable. We evaluated the results according to the similarity with the composition of the mixture by weight. We confirmed our hypothesis that if identifiable non-epidermal fragments are considered the results of microhistological analysis are improved, getting a more representative information of the diet.

References

BARKER, RD. 1986. An investigation into the accuracy of herbivore diet analysis. Aust. Wildlife Res. 13:559-568.

BARROS, M. 1969. Juncaceae. Pp. 109-137 en: M Correa (ed.). Flora patagónica. Typhaceae a Orchidaceae. Vol. 8. Parte 2. INTA.

BAUNGARTNER, LL & AC MARTIN. 1939. Plant histology as an aid in squirrel food-habit studies. J. Wildlife Manage. 3:266-268.

BRAY, JR & JT CURTIS. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27:325-349.

CABRERA, AL. 1976. Regiones fitogeográficas argentinas. Pp. 1-85 en: Enciclopedia argentina de agricultura y jardinería. Tomo 2. Fascículo 1. ACME.

CONSTANCE, L. 1988. Umbelliferae. Pp. 357-357 en: M Correa (ed.). Flora patagónica. Oxalidaceae a Cornaceae. Vol. 8. Parte 5. INTA.

DUSI, JL. 1949. Methods for determination of food habits by plant microtechniques and histology and their application to cottontail rabbit food habits. J. Wildlife Manage 13:295-299.

EZCURRA, C. 1985. Revisión del género Chuquiraga (Compositae-Mutisieae). Darwiniana 26:219-284.

HAVSTAD, RM & GB DONART. 1978. The microhistological technique: testing two central assumptions in South-Central New Mexico. J. Range Manage. 31:469-470.

HEADY, HF & GM VAN DYNE. 1965. Prediction of weigth composition from point samples on clipped herbage. J. Range Manage. 18:144-148.

HOLECHEK, JL & BD GROSS. 1982. Evaluation of different calculation procedures for microhistological analysis. J. Range Manage. 35:721-723.

HOLECHEK, JL & R VALDEZ. 1985. Magnification and shrub stemmy material influences on fecal analysis accurancy. J. Range Manage. 38:350-352.

HOLECHEK, JL & M VAVRA. 1981. The effect of slide and frequency observation numbers on the precision of microhistological analysis. J. Range Manage. 34:337-338.

JOHNSON, MK; H WOFFORD & HA PEARSON. 1983. Microhistological techniques for food habits analyses. Research Paper SO-199, USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experimental Station.

LINDSTRÖM, LI; MB MUJICA & LF HERNANDEZ. 1998. Descripción microhistológica de dicotiledóneas y NORBURY, GL. 1988. Microscopic analysis of gimnospermas del sur del distrito del Caldén. Rev. Arg. Prod. Anim. 18:117-128.

MANGUM SHIELDS, L. 1950. Leaf xeromorphy as related to physiological and structural influences. Bot. Rev. 16:399-447.

MENDEZ, E. 1994. Novedades en el género Sporobolus (Gramineae). Bol. Soc. Arg. Bot. 30:13- 19.herbivore diets - A problem and a solution. Aust. Wildlife Res. 15:51-57.

PELLIZA, A. 1993. Acerca de la microhistología. Comunicación Técnica 32. INTA-EEA Bariloche.

PELLIZA, A; P WILLEMS; V NAKAMATSU & A MANERO. 1997. Atlas dietario de herbívoros patagónicos. PRODESAR-INTA-GTZ.

PELLIZA, A; P WILLEMS & M MANACORDA. 2001. Dietary structural types of polygastric herbivores at different environments and seasons. J. Range Manage. 54:330-337.

PYYKKÖ, M. 1966. The leaf anatomy of East Patagonian xeromorphic plants. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 3:453-622.

RAGONESE, AM. 1990. Caracteres xeromorfos foliares de Nassauvia lagascae (compositae). Darwiniana 30:1-10.

SÁNCHEZ, E & J CARO. 1974. Anatomía caulinar de las especies de Ephedra de la flora argentina, E. breana Phil. y E. Ochreata. Darwiniana 18:511-519.

SATAKOPAN, S. 1972. Key to identification of plant remains in animal dropping. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 69:139-150.

SCHWABE, H. 1950. Estudio anatómico de las especies áfilas del género Cassia en la Argentina. Darwiniana 9:173-187.

SOLBRIG, OT & GH ORIANS. 1977. The adaptative characteristics of desert plants. A cost/benefit analysis of photosynthesis leads to predictions about the types and distribution of desert plants. Am. Sci. 65:412-421.

SPARKS, DR & JC MALECHEK. 1968. Estimating percentage dry weight in diets using a microscopic technique. J. Range Manage. 21:264-265.

STORR, GM. 1961. Microscopic analysis of faeces, a technique for ascertaining the diet of herbivorous mammals. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 14:157-164.

WASHINGTON, HG. 1984. Diversity, biotic and similarity indices. Commenwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization 18:653-694.

WESTOBY, M; GR ROST & JA WEIS. 1976. Problems with estimating herbivore diets by microscopically identifying plant fragments from stomachs. J. Mammal. 57:167-172.

Published

2004-06-01

How to Cite

Sepúlveda Plama, L., Pelliza, A., & Manacorda, M. (2004). The importance of non epidermal tissues in microanalysis of herbivorous diet. Ecología Austral, 14(1), 031–038. Retrieved from https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1519

Issue

Section

Articles