Chemical characterization of Patagonian shrubs with different herbivore preference

Authors

  • Fernando P. Cavagnaro Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Rodolfo A. Golluscio Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Diego F. Wassner Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Damián A. Ravetta Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Keywords:

Secondary metabolites, Grazing, Adesmia campestris, Mulinum spinosum, Senecio filaginoides

Abstract

In southwestern Chubut (Patagonia, Argentina), shrubs provide safe sites for the recruitment of almost all the species of the community. As different shrubs species are subjected to different sheep grazing pressures, the knowledge of their response mechanisms to grazing is crucial to the designing of sustainable systems of grazing management for these ecosystems. This work tested two hypotheses related to the adaptive and plastic responses to grazing for the three dominant shrubs of this community (Adesmia campestris, Mulinum spinosum and Senecio filaginoides). We studied the chemical composition of leaves of these shrubs undertwo contrasting sheep grazing pressures. We carried out a chemical screening to sequentially extract three groups of different polarity carbon based secondary metabolites (CBSM): oil, phenols and hydrocarbon compounds. We found that (1) the less preferred species (Senecio filaginoides) contained higher levels of the three fractions of CBSM than the other two species (adaptive response), and (2) only in Senecio filaginoides the CBSM content, in particular those of oil and hydrocarbon fractions, increased with grazing. The absence of plastic responses in the other two species could be related to the presence of structural defenses (thorns).

References

AGRAWAL, AA & MT RUTTER. 1998. Dynamic anti-herbivore defence in ant-plants: the role of induced responses. Oikos 83:227-236.

AGUIAR, MR & OE SALA. 1994. Competition, facilitation, seed distribution and the origin of patches in a Patagonian steppe. Oikos 70:26-34.

AGUIAR, MR; A SORIANO & OE SALA. 1992. Competition and facilitation in the recruitment of seedlings in the Patagonian steppe. Funct. Ecol. 6:66-70.

BONVISSUTO, G; E MORICZ DE TECSO; O ASTIBIA & J ANCHORENA. 1983. Resultados preliminares sobre los hábitos dietarios de ovinos en un pastizal semidesértico de Patagonia. IDIA 36(supl.):243-253.

BUCHANAN, RA; IM CULL; FH OTEY & CR RUSSELL. 1978. Hydrocarbon- and rubber-producing crops. Evaluation of U.S. plant species. Econ. Bot. 32:131-145.

BURKART, A; L BRAVO; MN CORREA; RH FORTUNATO; RN GIANGUALANI ET AL. 1984. Leguminosae. Pp. 89-297 en: Flora patagónica. Tomo VIII. Parte IVb. Colección Científica, INTA. Buenos Aires.

CABRERA, AL. 1971. Compositae. Pp. 1-432 en: Flora patagónica. Tomo VIII. Parte VII. Colección Científica, INTA. Buenos Aires.

CIPOLLINI, D. 1998. Induced defences and phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:200.

COLEY, PD; JP BRYANT & FS CHAPIN III. 1985. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defence. Science 230:895-899.

CONSTANCE, L. 1988. Umbelliferae. Pp. 310-379 en: Flora patagónica. Tomo VIII. Parte V. Colección Científica, INTA. Buenos Aires.

COUGHENOUR, MB. 1985. Graminoid responses to grazing by large herbivores: adaptations, exaptations, and interacting processes. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72:852-863.

DOMÍNGUEZ, XA. 1973. Métodos de investigación fitoquímica. Limusa. México DF.

ERDFELDER, E; F FAUL & A BUCHNER. 1996. GPower: a general power analysis program. Behav. Res. Meth. Ins. C. 28:1-11.

FEENY, PP. 1976. Plant antiherbivore defence. Pp. 1-40 en: JW Wallace & RL Mansell (eds). Biochemical interactions between plants and insects. Recent advances in Phytochemistry. Vol. 10. Plenum. New York.

FERNÁNDEZ, RJ; AH NUÑEZ & A SORIANO. 1992. Contrasting demography of two Patagonian shrubs under different conditions of sheep grazing and resource supply. Oecologia 91:39-46.

FERNÁNDEZ, RJ & JM PARUELO. 1988. Root system of two Patagonian shrubs: A quantitative description using a geometrical method. J. Range Manage. 41:220-223.

FERNÁNDEZ, RJ; OE SALA & RA GOLLUSCIO. 1991. Woody and herbaceous aboveground production of a Patagonian steppe. J. Range Manage. 44:434-437.

GOLLUSCIO, RA; RJC LEÓN & S PERELMAN. 1982. Caracterización fitosociológica de la estepa del oeste del Chubut. Su relación con el gradiente ambiental. Bol. Soc. Arg. Bot. 21:299-324.

GRIME, JP. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation process. John Wiley. Chichester.

GRUBB, PJ. 1992. A positive distrust in simplicity: lessons from plant defences and from competition among plants and among animals. J. Ecol. 80:585-610.

HORNER, JD. 1988. Astringency of Douglas-fir foliage in relation to phenology and xylem pressure potential. J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1227-1237.

HURLBERT, SH. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54:187-211.

KARBAN, R; AA AGRAWAL & M MANGEL. 1997. The benefits of induced defenses against herbivores. Ecology 78:1351-1355.

LAUENROTH, WK. 1998. Guanacos, spiny shrubs and the evolutionary history of grazing in the Patagonian steppe. Ecología Austral 8:211-216.

LEÓN, RJC; D BRAN; M COLLANTES; JM PARUELO & A SORIANO. 1998. Grandes unidades de vegetación de la Patagonia extra andina. Ecología Austral 8:125-144.

MILCHUNAS, DG; OE SALA & WK LAUENROTH. 1988. A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure. Am. Nat. 132:87-106.

MILEWSKI, AV; TP YOUNG & D MADDEN. 1991. Thorns as induced defenses. Experimental evidence. Oecologia 86:70-75.

OWEN-SMITH, N. 1982. Factors influencing the consumption of plants products by large herbivores. Pp. 359-404 en: FJ Huntley & BH Walker (eds). Ecology of tropical savannas. Springer-Verlag. New York.

PERELMAN, SB; RJC LEÓN & JP BUSSACCA. 1997. Floristic changes related to grazing intensity ina Patagonian shrub steppe. Ecography 20:400-406.

PYYKKO, M. 1966. The leaf anatomy of East Patagonian xeromorphic plants. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 3:453-622.

RHOADES, DF & RG CATES. 1976. Toward a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. Pp. 168- 213 en: JW Wallace & RL Mansell (eds). Biochemical interactions between plants and insects. Recent advances in Phytochemistry. Vol. 10. Plenum. New York.

SOMLO, R; C DURAÑONA & R ORTÍZ. 1985. Valor nutritivo de especies forrajeras patagónicas. Rev. Arg. Prod. Anim. 5:589-605.

SOMLO, R; A PELLIZA; P WILLEMS; V NAKAMATSU & A MANERO. 1997. Atlas dietario de herbívoros patagónicos. PRODESAR-INTA-GTZ. San Carlos de Bariloche.

WINK, M. 1988. Plant breeding: importance of plant secondaries metabolites for protection against pathogens and herbivores. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75:225-233.

Downloads

Published

2003-12-01

How to Cite

Cavagnaro, F. P., Golluscio, R. A., Wassner, D. F., & Ravetta, D. A. (2003). Chemical characterization of Patagonian shrubs with different herbivore preference. Ecología Austral, 13(2), 215–222. Retrieved from https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1534

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2003)

Section

Articles

License

Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.