The The Argentine Native Plant Nursery Network (REVINA): An ethnobotanical perspective to strengthen ecosystem restoration in Argentina

Authors

  • Mariela V. Lacoretz Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, IEGEBA-CONICET. CABA
  • Ingrid Villanova Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Agricultura Familiar, INTA. Buenos Aires
  • Marcela I. Sánchez Jardín Botánico Arturo E. Ragonese, Instituto de Recursos Biológicos, INTA. Buenos Aires
  • España Verrastro Coordinación de Programas Socioambientales, Secretaría de Extensión, Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Buenos Aires
  • Piedad M. Cristiano Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, IEGEBA-CONICET. CABA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.1.0.1784

Keywords:

ecological restoration, plant production, socially robust science, knowledge co-production

Abstract

The Argentine Native Plant Nursery Network (REVINA) links different social actors involved in native plant production, their valorization and the restoration of Argentina’s ecosystems. It is essential to strengthen the network in order to meet the country’s restoration goals, considering that the nursery community will generate the plant species that will be the primary inputs for restoration projects. In this paper we study the native plant nursery network, the nursery community and the plants they produce, in order to strengthen restoration projects in Argentina through the survey of the participants of the annual meetings of the REVINA in the period 2016-2020. We observed the network has grown remarkably since its creation, reflecting the increasing interest in native plants in recent years. Most of the plant species grown in the nurseries belonged to the Fabaceae family, are woody, and show a strong bias towards species from the centre-east of the country, in line with the number of nurseries concentrated in that region. A great number of nurseries have a small production, although, over the years, larger nurseries joined the network. The perspective used allowed us to obtain a first list of native plant nurseries and the species they cultivate. Finally, some aspects are proposed in order to strengthen this network of actors and thus be able to fulfill the restoration initiatives of the country.

References

Arenas, P. 2012. Etnobotánica en zonas áridas y semiáridas del Cono Sur de Sudamérica. CEFYBO-CONICET. Buenos Aires.

Arenas, P., and G. J. Martínez. 2012. Estudio etnobotánico en regiones áridas y semiáridas de Argentina y zonas limítrofes. Experiencias y reflexiones metodológicas de un grupo de investigación. Pp. 11-43 en Etnobotánica en zonas áridas y semiáridas del Cono Sur de Sudamérica. CEFYBO-CONICET Buenos Aires.

Aronson, J., P. H. S. Brancalion, G. Durigan, R. R. Rodrigues, V. L. Engel, M. Tabarelli, J. M. D. Torezan, S. Gandolfi, A. C. G. de Melo, P. Y. Kageyama, M. C. M. Marques, A. G. Nave, S. V. Martins, F. B. Gandara, A. Reis, L. M. Barbosa, and F. R. Scarano. 2011. What Role Should Government Regulation Play in Ecological Restoration? Ongoing Debate in São Paulo State, Brazil. Restoration Ecology 19:690-695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00815.x.

Bannister, J. R., R. Vargas-Gaete, J. F. Ovalle, M. Acevedo, A. Fuentes-Ramirez, P. J. Donoso, A. Promis, and C. Smith-Ramírez. 2018. Major bottlenecks for the restoration of natural forests in Chile. Restoration Ecology 26:1039-1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12880.

Bardgett, R. D., and D. A. Wardle. 2010. Aboveground-belowground linkages: biotic interactions, ecosystem processes, and global change. Oxford University Press.

Bennett, B. C. 2005. Ethnobotany Education, Opportunities, and Needs in the U.S. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 3:113. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.3.0.113-122.

Bonn Challenge. 2011. Bonn Challenge. Restore our future. URL: bonnchallenge.org/about-the-goal#commitments.

Capparelli, A., N. Hilgert, A. Ladio, V. S. Lema, C. Llano, and M. L. Pochettino. 2011. Paisajes culturales de Argentina: Pasado y presente desde las perspectivas etnobotánica y paleoetnobotánica. Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ecología de Paisajes 2:67-79.

CDB. 2010. Convention on Biological Diversity. URL: cbd.int/countries/profile/?country=ar.

Ceccon, E., M. Méndez-Toribio, and C. Martínez-Garza. 2020. Social Participation in Forest Restoration Projects: Insights from a National Assessment in Mexico. Human Ecology 48:609-617. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00178-w.

Chapin III, F. S., E. S. Zavaleta, V. T. Eviner, R. L. Naylor, P. M. Vitousek, H. L. Reynolds, D. U. Hooper, S. Lavorel, O. E. Sala, and S. E. Hobbie. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234-242. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012241.

Darwinion. 2021. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion. Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares del Conosur Sudamérica). URL: www2.darwin.edu.ar/Proyectos/FloraArgentina/fa.htm.

De Luca, N. C. 2020. Manual de cultivo y forestación de especies nativas para el centro de Argentina. Ecoval Ediciones, Córdoba.

Díaz, S., J. Fargione, F. S. Chapin, and D. Tilman. 2006. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biology 4:1300-1305. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277.

Dumroese, R. K., T. Luna, and T. D. Landis. 2009. Nursery Manual for Native Plants: A guide for tribal nurseries. Volumen 1: Nursery management. Agriculture Handbook. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C.

Eibl, B. 2020. Fuentes y certificación del material de propagación de especies nativas. 1er Congreso Argentino de Semillas. URL: tinyurl.com/ywkuh6mt.

Eynard, C., A. Calviño, and L. Ashworth. 2020. Cultivo de plantas nativas: propagación y viverismo de especies de Argentina central. Ecoval Ediciones, Córdoba.

Forister, M. L., V. Novotny, A. K. Panorska, L. Baje, Y. Basset, P. T. Butterill, L. Cizek, P. D. Coley, F. Dem, I. R. Diniz, P. Drozd, M. Fox, A. E. Glassmire, R. Hazen, J. Hrcek, J. P. Jahner, O. Kaman, T. J. Kozubowski, T. A. Kursar, O. T. Lewis, J. Lill, R. J. Marquis, S. E. Miller, H. C. Morais, M. Murakami, H. Nickel, N. Pardikes, R. E. Ricklefs, M. S. Singer, A. M. Smilanich, J. O. Stireman, S. Villamarín-Cortez, S. Vodka, M. Volf, D. L. Wagner, T. Walla, G. D. Weiblen, and L. A. Dyer. 2015. The global distribution of diet breadth in insect herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112:442-447. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423042112.

Gann, G. D., T. McDonald, B. Walder, J. Aronson, C. R. Nelson, J. Jonson, J. G. Hallett, C. Eisenberg, M. R. Guariguata, J. Liu, F. Hua, C. Echeverría, E. Gonzales, N. Shaw, K. Decleer, and K. W. Dixon. 2019. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition. Restoration Ecology 27:S1-S46. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13035.

Garzón, N. V., C. H. Rodríguez León, E. Ceccon, and D. R. Pérez. 2020. Ecological restoration‐based education in the Colombian Amazon: Toward a new society‐nature relationship. Restoration Ecology 28:1053-1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13216.

Gross, M. 2006. Beyond expertise: Ecological science and the making of socially robust restoration strategies. Journal for Nature Conservation 14:172-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2006.05.004.

Haase, D., and A. Davis. 2017. Developing and supporting quality nursery facilities and staff are necessary to meet global forest and landscape restoration needs. Reforesta:69-93. https://doi.org/10.21750/refor.4.06.45.

Hamilton, A., P. Shengji, J. Kessy, A. A. Khan, S. Lagos-Witte, and Z. K. Shinwari. 2003. The purposes and teaching of applied ethnobotany. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

Handel, S. N. 2017. Growing pains: Hopes and heartaches at native plant nurseries. Ecological Restoration 35:279-280. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.35.4.279.

Harrison, P. A., P. M. Berry, G. Simpson, J. R. Haslett, M. Blicharska, M. Bucur, R. Dunford, B. Egoh, M. Garcia-Llorente, N. Geamănă, W. Geertsema, E. Lommelen, L. Meiresonne, and F. Turkelboom. 2014. Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review. Ecosystem Services 9:191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.006.

Hurrell, J. A. 2014. Urban Ethnobotany in Argentina: Theoretical advances and methodological strategies. Ethnobiology and Conservation 3:1-11. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2014-6-3.3-1-11.

Hurrell, J. A., and U. Paulino de Albuquerque. 2012. Is Ethnobotany an Ecological Science? Steps towards a complex Ethnobotany. Ethnobiology and Conservation 1:4. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2012-8-1.4-1-16.

INASE. 2018. Resolución EX-2018-16915944-APN-DSA#INASE. URL: tinyurl.com/5emfjxae.

INDEC. 2010. Censo Nacional de Población, Hogares y Viviendas 2010. URL: tinyurl.com/2p8k5w7h.

Initiative 20x20. 2014. URL: tinyurl.com/ycksk5p8.

Joseau, M., M. Conles, and G. Verzino. 2013. Conservación de recursos forestales nativos de Argentina: El cultivo de plantas leñosas en vivero y a campo. Editorial Brujas, Córdoba.

Lacoretz, M. V, C. Malavert, C. Rolandi, C. Zilli, N. Madanes, and P. M. Cristiano. 2021. Caracterización de viveros de plantas nativas y su posible aporte a la restauración de los talares bonaerenses. Ecología Austral 31:242-250. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.21.31.2.0.1240.

León-Lobos, P., M. A. Bustamante-Sánchez, C. R. Nelson, D. Alarcón, R. Hasbún, M. Way, H. W. Pritchard, and J. J. Armesto. 2020. Lack of adequate seed supply is a major bottleneck for effective ecosystem restoration in Chile: friendly amendment to Bannister et al. (2018). Restoration Ecology 28:277-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13113.

Ley Nro. 26331. 2007. Presupuestos mínimos de protección ambiental de los bosques nativos. URL: tinyurl.com/y74883ns.

Martínez, G., C. Romero, C. Pen, M. Villar, and P. Durando. 2016. Etnobotánica participativa en escuelas rurales de la comuna Paso Viejo (Departamento Cruz del Eje, Córdoba, Argentina). Bonplandia 25:145-162. https://doi.org/10.30972/bon.2521263.

MEA. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being. Island press.

Monasterio, G. 2016. Plantemos un árbol! Guía práctica para cultivar tus propios árboles. Editor Literario Rosanna Caramella, Salta.

Muiño, W. A. 2011. La etnobotánica médica del área de transición pampeano cuyana. Bonplandia 20:353-369. https://doi.org/10.30972/bon.2021419

Norström, A. V., C. Cvitanovic, M. F. Löf, S. West, C. Wyborn, P. Balvanera, A. T. Bednarek, E. M. Bennett, R. Biggs, A. de Bremond, B. M. Campbell, J. G. Canadell, S. R. Carpenter, C. Folke, E. A. Fulton, O. Gaffney, S. Gelcich, J. B. Jouffray, M. Leach, M. Le Tissier, B. Martín-López, E. Louder, M. F. Loutre, A. M. Meadow, H. Nagendra, D. Payne, G. D. Peterson, B. Reyers, R. Scholes, C. I. Speranza, M. Spierenburg, M. Stafford-Smith, M. Tengö, S. van der Hel, I. van Putten, and H. Österblom. 2020. Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability 3:182-190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2.

Nowotny, H., P. B. Scott, and M. T. Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. John Wiley and Sons.

Pérez, D., P. Meli, D. Renison, F. R. Barri, A. M. Beider, G. A. Burgueño, A. D. D. Galván, S. Dardelli, M. de Paz, F. M. Farinaccio, G. Papazian, M. Sirombra, and R. Torres. 2018. La Red de Restauración Ecológica de la Argentina (REA): Avances, vacíos y rumbo a seguir. Ecología Austral 28:353-360. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.18.28.2.0.659.

Pérez, D. R., F. Del Mar González, M. E. R. Araujo, D. A. Paredes, and E. Meinardi. 2019. Restoration of society-nature relationship based on education: A model and progress in Patagonian Drylands. Ecological Restoration 37:182-191. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.37.3.182.

PNRBN. 2019. Plan Nacional de Restauración de Bosques Nativos. Resolución 267 / 2019. Secretaría de Gobierno de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable. URL: tinyurl.com/4fh7jprr.

Pochettino, M. L., J. A. Hurrell, and M. M. Bonicatto. 2014. Horticultura periurbana: estudios etnobotánicos en huertos familiares y comerciales de la Argentina. Ambienta 107:2-15.

PPRPA-NB. 2020. Plan Provincial de Recuperación del Patrimonio Ambiental-Nativas Bonaerenses. OPDS, Gobierno de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. URL: tinyurl.com/2p9cw7d6.

QGIS Development Team. 2019. Quantum GIS Geographic Information System (QGIS 3.8 Zanzibar). Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. URL: qgis.org/es/site.

R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R v.4.0.4. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: R-project.org.

Rosso, C. N., and G. F. Scarpa. 2019. Etnobotánica médica moqoit y su comparación con grupos criollos del Chaco argentino. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 54:637-662. https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v54.n4.24868.

Rovere, A. E., S. Molares, and A. H. Ladio. 2013. Plantas utilizadas en cercos vivos de ciudades patagónicas: Aportes de la etnobotánica para la conservación. Ecologia Austral 23:165-173. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.13.23.3.0.1171.

Sánchez, M. I., P. Aboitiz, and I. Villanova. 2020. La Red de Viveros de Plantas Nativas-REVINA, situación actual y necesidades de semillas. 1er Congreso Argentino de Semillas. URL: tinyurl.com/ywkuh6mt.

Suárez, M. E. 2014. Etnobotánica wichí del bosque xerófito en el Chaco Semiárido salteño. Editorial autores de Argentina.

Vera, C. 2018. Farmers transformed how we investigate climate. Nature 562:9. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06856-6.

La Red de Viveros de Plantas Nativas de Argentina (REVINA): Una perspectiva etnobotánica para fortalecer la restauración de ecosistemas en la Argentina

Published

2022-01-29

How to Cite

Lacoretz, M. V., Villanova, I., Sánchez, M. I., Verrastro, E., & Cristiano, P. M. (2022). The The Argentine Native Plant Nursery Network (REVINA): An ethnobotanical perspective to strengthen ecosystem restoration in Argentina. Ecología Austral, 32(1), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.1.0.1784