Participative territory management for the conservation of the Espinal native forests: A case study in Argentina

Evangelina Natale; María I. Fernández; Carola Astudillo; Juan E. Sala; Julia E. Junquera; Gustavo Balbi; Antonia Oggero; Marina De La Reta

doi:10.25260/EA.22.32.3.0.1881

Authors

Evangelina Natale Instituto de Ciencias de La Tierra, Biodiversidad y Ambiente (ICBIA), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (UNRC) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físico-Químicas y Naturales, Departamento de Ciencias Naturales (UNRC). Río Cuarto, Argentina. Fundación Conservación y Desarrollo (ConyDes). 5 Secretaría de Recursos Hídricos de la Provincia de Córdoba
María I. Fernández Instituto de Ciencias de La Tierra, Biodiversidad y Ambiente (ICBIA), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (UNRC) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físico-Químicas y Naturales, Departamento de Ciencias Naturales (UNRC). Río Cuarto, Argentina. Fundación Conservación y Desarrollo (ConyDes). 5 Secretaría de Recursos Hídricos de la Provincia de Córdoba
Carola Astudillo Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, Territoriales y Educativas (ISTE) - (UNRC-CONICET). Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físico-Químicas y Naturales, Departamento de Ciencias Naturales (UNRC). Río Cuarto, Argentina
Juan E. Sala Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos (IBIOMAR-CONICET). Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina. Laboratorio de Problemáticas Socio-Ambientales, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco (UNPSJB). Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina
Julia E. Junquera Fundación Conservación y Desarrollo (ConyDes)
Gustavo Balbi Secretaría de Recursos Hídricos de la Provincia de Córdoba
Antonia Oggero Instituto de Ciencias de La Tierra, Biodiversidad y Ambiente (ICBIA), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (UNRC) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físico-Químicas y Naturales, Departamento de Ciencias Naturales (UNRC). Río Cuarto, Argentina
Marina De La Reta Fundación Conservación y Desarrollo (ConyDes)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.3.0.1881

Keywords:

ecosystem services, institutional cooperation, protected area, social value, participative workshop, biodiversity

Abstract

Natural systems in Argentina have gradually faded as a consequence of land use change, resulting in a diminished capacity to provide the ecosystem services (ES) essential for the well-being of the communities. The basin of the Chocancharava River fits within that context and is immersed in an urban-agricultural matrix that has produced major forest fragmentation. Based on this socio-environmental problem, the present report recounts the challenges and possibilities pertaining to an experience in community management. First of all, a conservation-status assessment of the forest remnants was used as a steppingstone to convene the first meeting of institutions linked to the territory. This interagency coupling allowed for a more holistic diagnosis and the formulation of action plans. The first result was the creation of a peri-urban provincial reserve. Managing the reserve demanded a wider involvement from the community and the provision of a space where all possible voices could be heard. Therefore, the first participative workshop was held, in which ties with the environment were problematized through the ES framework. This experience was of importance when pondering about unilateral decision-making models and grasping the value of community-based networks to generate more inclusive policies. In addition, the workshop provided a space for the co-production of knowledge regarding main actors and tensions about natural resources uses. Furthermore, this process constituted a road of reflection regarding our practices, which are vital for new community processes with results that are legitimate and relevant for the socioecological transformation of the system.

References

Allen, C. R., J. J. Fontaine, K. L. Pope, and A. S. Garmestani. 2011. Adaptive management for a turbulent future. J Environ Manage 92(5):1339-1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.019.

Berbés-Blázquez, M., J. A. González, and U. Pascual. 2016. Towards an ecosystem services approach that addresses social power relations. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 19:134-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.02.003.

Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2003. Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

Bertoni, M., and M. J. López. 2010. Percepciones sociales ambientales: Valores y actitudes hacia la conservación de la Reserva de Biosfera “Parque Atlántico Mar Chiquita” Argentina. Estudios y Perspectivas En Turismo 19:835-849.

Cáceres, D. M., E. Tapella, F. Quétier, and S. Díaz. 2015. The social value of biodiversity and ecosystem services from the perspectives of different social actors. Ecol Soc 20(1):62. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07297-200162.

Colloff, M. J., R. M. Wise, I. Palomo, S. Lavorel, and U. Pascual, 2020. Nature’s contribution to adaptation: insights from examples of the transformation of social-ecological systems. Ecosystems and People 16(1):137-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1754919.

Díaz, S., U. Pascual, M. Stenseke, B. Martín-López, R. T. Watson, Z. Molnár, R. Hill, et al. 2018. Assessing nature's contributions to people. Science 359(6373):270-272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826.

Donald, P. F., and A. D. Evans. 2006. Habitat connectivity and matrix restoration. J Appl Ecol: 43:209-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01146.x.

Durand, L., and J. Jímenez. 2010. Sobre áreas naturales protegidas y la construcción de no-lugares. Notas para México. Revista Lider 16:59-72. https://revistaliderchile.com/index.php/liderchile/article/view/159.

Elosegi, A., and S. Sabater. 2009. Conceptos y técnicas en ecología fluvial. Fundación BBVA, 1 ed. España.

Fernández-Vargas, G. 2017. Análisis de la gestión ambiental desde el concepto de sistemas socio-ecológicos. Estudio de caso cuenca hidrográfica del río Guabas, Colombia. Gestión y Ambiente 20(1):62-81. https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v20n1.62122.

Fischer, J., T. A. Gardner, E. M Bennett, P. Balvanera, R. Biggs, S. Carpenter, T. Tim Daw, C. Folke, R. Hill, T. Hughes, T. Luthe, M. Maass, M. Meacham, N. V. Albert Norström, G. Peterson, C. Queiroz, R. Seppelt, M. Spierenburg, and J. Tenhunen. 2015. Advancing sustainability through mainstreaming a social-ecological systems perspective. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:144-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.002.

Fundación Legado Chile. 2018. Manual para la planificación y gestión de proyectos de conservación de ecosistemas urbanos. Experiencia en Llanquihue. Santiago de Chile. Chile

Funtowicz, S. O., and J. Ravetz. 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7):739-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L.

García-Llorente, M., P. A. Harrison, P. Berry, I. Palomo, E. Gómez-Baggethun, I. Iniesta-Arandia, I. Montes, C. García del Amo and B. Martín-López. 2018. What can conservation strategies learn from the ecosystem services approach? Insights from ecosystem assessments in two Spanish protected areas. Biodivers Conserv 27(7):1575-1597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1152-4.

Grau, H. R., N. I. Gasparri, and T. M. Aide. 2005. Agriculture expansion and deforestation in seasonally dry forests of northwest Argentina. Environ Conserv 32:140-148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892905002092.

Hanspach, J., L. Jamila Haider, E. Oteros‐Rozas, A. Stahl Olafsson, N. M. Gulsrud, C. M. Raymond, M. Totalba, B. Martín-López, C. Bieling, M. Garcia-Martín, C. Albert, T. H. Beery, N. Fagerholm, I. Díaz-Revirego, and A. Drews-Shambroom. 2020. Biocultural approaches to sustainability: A systematic review of the scientific literature. People Nat. (Hoboken) 2(3):643-659. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10120.

Horcea-Milcu, A. I., D. J. Abson, C.I. Apetrei, I. A. Duse, R. Freeth, M. Riechers, D. P. M. Lam, C. Dorninger, and D. J. Lang. 2019. Values in transformational sustainability science: four perspectives for change. Sustain Sci 14(5):1425-1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00656-1.

Ives, C. D., M. Giusti, J. Fischer, D. J. Abson, K. Klaniecki, C. Dorninger, J. Laudan, S. Barthel, P. Abernethy, B. Martin-Lopez, C. M. Raymond, D. Kendal, and H. von Wehrden. 2017. Human-nature connection: a multidisciplinary review. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 26–27:106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.005.

Jacobs, S., N. Dendoncker, B. Martín-López, D. N. Barton, E. Gómez-Baggethun, F. Boeraeve, F. L. McGrathg, et al. 2016. A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions. Ecosyst Serv 22:213-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007.

Jacobs, S., N. Zafra-Calvo, D. González-Jiménez, L. Guibrunet, K. Benessaiah, A. Berghöfer, et al. 2020. Use your power for good: Plural valuation of nature - the Oaxaca statement. Global Sustain 3:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.2.

Jaeger, J. A. G., R. Bertiller, C. Schwick, and F. Kienast. 2010. Suitability criteria for measures of urban sprawl. Ecol Indic 10:397-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.007.

Kareiva, P., and M. Marvier. 2012. What is conservation science? BioScience 62(11):962-969. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.11.5.

Kadykalo, A. N., M. D. López-Rodríguez, J. Ainscough, N. Droste, H. Ryu, G. Ávila-Flores, et al. 2019. Disentangling ‘ecosystem services’ and ‘nature’s contributions to people’. Ecosystems and People 15(1):269-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1669713.

Kornblit, A. L. 2007. Metodologías cualitativas en ciencias sociales. Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos.

Langebeck Cuéllar, E., and J. E. Beltrán Vargas. 2016. Sustentabilidad territorial de los procesos de ocupación urbano–rurales en Usme, Bogotá - Colombia. Gestión y Ambiente 19(1):11-30. URL: tinyurl.com/2kruxn8t.

Martín-López, B., and C. Montes. 2015. Restoring the human capacity for conserving biodiversity: a social-ecological approach. Sustai Sci 10(4):699-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0283-3.

Martín-López, B., E. Gómez-Baggethun, M. García-Llorente, and C. Montes. 2014. Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol Ind 37(PART A):220-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003.

Mastrangelo, M. E., F. Weyland, L. P. Herrera, S. H. Villarino, M. P. Barral, and A. D. Auer. 2015. Ecosystem services research in contrasting socio-ecological contexts of Argentina: Critical assessment and future directions. Ecosyst Serv 16:63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.001.

Minaverry, C. M. 2018. El derecho ambiental en la gestión de los bosques nativos (Espinal) en Argentina. Sociedad y Ambiente 16:157-177. https://doi.org/10.31840/sya.v0i16.1817.

Natale, E., M. Arana, G. Villalba, H. Reinoso, M. De La Reta, and A. Oggero. 2019. Caracterización y estado de conservación de la vegetación ribereña de la cuenca media del río Cuarto. Boletín Sociedad Argentina Botánica 54:105-123. https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v54.n1.23589.

Nayak, P. K., L. E. Oliveira, and F. Berkes. 2014. Resource degradation, marginalization, and poverty in small-scale fisheries: Threats to social-ecological resilience in India and Brazil. Ecol Soc 19(2):73. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06656-190273.

Nel-Lo Andreu, M. 2008. La intensidad de la gestión. La clave para un desarrollo turístico sostenible en áreas protegidas. Diagnóstico de las áreas protegidas de América Central. Boletín De La Asociación De Geógrafos Españoles 47:333-354. URL: tinyurl.com/223k9dc9.

Nelson, M. P., and J. A. Vucetich. 2009. True sustainability needs an ethical revolution. Ecologist (on line). URL: tinyurl.com/2t37ykdp.

Norström, A. V., C. Cvitanovic, M. F, Löf, S. West, C. Wyborn, P. Balvanera, A. T. Bednarek, et al. 2020. Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nat Sustain 3(3):182-190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2.

Oberhuber, T., P. L. Lomas, G. Duch, and M. González Reyes. 2010. El papel de la biodiversidad. Centro de Investigación para la Paz (CIP-Ecosocial). Madrid.

Ortega Uribe, T. O., M. Mastrangelo, D. Torrez, A. Piaz, and F. Gallego. 2015. Estudios transdisciplinarios en socio- ecosistemas: Reflexiones teóricas y su aplicación en contextos latinoamericanos. Investigación Ambiental, Ciencia y Política Pública 6:123-136.

Ostrom, E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419-422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133.

Palomo, I., C. Montes, B. Martín-López, J. A. González, M. García-Llorente, P. Alcorlo, and M. R. G. Mora. 2014. Incorporating the social-ecological approach in protected areas in the anthropocene. BioScience 64(3):181-191. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bit033.

Rathwell, K. J., and G. D. Peterson. 2012. Connecting social networks with ecosystem services for watershed governance: A social-ecological network perspective highlights the critical role of bridging organizations. Ecol Soc 17(2):24. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04810-170224.

Resolución 151/17 2017: Estrategia Nacional sobre la biodiversidad-Plan de acción 2016-2020. República Argentina. Anexo I. Pp. 127.

R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: R-project.org.

Reyers, B., C. Folke, M. L. Moore, R. Biggs, and V. Galaz. 2018. Social-ecological systems insights for navigating the dynamics of the anthropocene. Annu Rev Environ Resour 43:267-289. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085349.

Rincón-Ruiz, A., P. Arias-Arévalo, J. M. Núñez Hernández, H. Cotler, M. Aguado Caso, et al. 2019. Applying integrated valuation of ecosystem services in Latin America: Insights from 21 case studies. Ecosyst Serv 36(45). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100901.

Rincón-Ruíz, A., M. Echeverry-Duque, A. M. Piñeros, C. H. Tapia, A. David, P. Arias-Arévalo, and P. A. Zuluaga. 2014. Integrated Valuation Biodiversity. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH). Bogotá, D.C. Colombia.

Rincón-Ruiz, A., D. Lara, L. G. Castro, and C. Rojas. 2017. Conflictos Socioambientales y Servicios Ecosistémicos en la cuenca del Río Orotoy: Reflexiones para su gestión. Ambiente y Sostenibilidad 3. https://doi.org/10.25100/ays.v0i0.4285.

Rist, S., M. Chidambaranathan, C. Escobar, U. Wiesmann, and A. Zimmermann. 2007. Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. J Rural Stud 23(1):23-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.02.006.

Sala, J. E. 2021. Conservation of Coastal Atlantic Environments in Northern Patagonia: A Critical Review. In: E. Walter Helbling, M. A. Narvarte, R. A. González and V. E. Villafañe (eds.). Global Change in Atlantic Coastal Patagonian Ecosystems. Natural and Social Sciences of Patagonia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86676-1_16.

Sala, J. E., and G. Torchio. 2019. Moving towards public policy-ready science: philosophical insights on the social-ecological systems perspective for conservation science. Ecosystems and People 15(1):232-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1657502.

Vessuri, H., I. Sánchez-Rose, I. Hernández-Valencia, L. Hernández, L. Bravo, and I. Rodríguez. 2014. Desigualdades de conocimiento y estrategias para reducir las asimetrías. El trabajo de campo compartido y la negociación transdisciplinaria. desiguALdades.net. Working Paper Series 62. Berlin: desiguALdades.net International Research Network on Interdependent Inequalities in Latin America. URL: tinyurl.com/m44k6ccw.

Vidal-Abarca, M. R., M. L. Suárez-Alonso, F. Santos-Martín, B. Martín-López, J. Benayas, and C. Montes. 2014. Understanding complex links between fluvial ecosystems and social indicators in Spain: An ecosystem services approach. Ecol Complex 20:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.07.002.

Zafra-Calvo, N., P. Balvanera, U. Pascual, J. Merçon, B. Martín-López, M. van Noordwij, et al. 2020. Plural valuation of nature for equity and sustainability: Insights from the Global South. Glob Environ Change 63:102115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102115.

Zafra-Calvo, N., and J. Geldmann. 2020. Protected areas to deliver biodiversity need management effectiveness and equity. Glob Ecol Conserv 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01026.

Zak, M. R., M. Cabido, D. Cáceres, and S. Díaz. 2008. What drives accelerated land cover change in central Argentina? Synergistic consequences of climatic, socioeconomic, and technological factors. Environ Manage 42(2):181-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9101-y.