Bird community responses to local and landscape variables in the city of Santiago, Chile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.23.33.2.0.2017Keywords:
avifauna, biodiversity hotspot, guilds, Mediterranean ecosystems, urban vegetation, urbanizationAbstract
Urbanization has transformed the landscape affecting ecosystems around the planet. To provide scientific evidence for the conservation of birds in urban environments, we evaluated bird community responses to local habitat and landscape variables in Santiago city, the capital of Chile. We evaluated 118 sites (1 km2 in size) distributed throughout the city, which varied in cover and aggregation of woody cover. At each site, we recorded birds and environmental variables at four sampling points during the breeding and non-breeding seasons. Using community indices (Shannon’s diversity and Pielou’s evenness), we quantified the effect of landscape variables (percent and aggregation of woody vegetation cover) on the bird community. Then, we identified bird guilds, categorized according to diet, foraging substrate, nest substrate and body size. Using canonical correspondence analyses, we observed relationships between bird guilds and environmental variables quantified at the local and landscape scales. We recorded 42 species of birds. We found more diverse and equitable bird communities the higher the cover and aggregation of woody vegetation in the landscape. Granivorous and ground foraging birds dominated the assemblage, being positively associated with the built environment. Vegetation cover at the local and landscape scale had positive effects on most of the identified guilds, including invertebrate-feeding birds, omnivores, carnivores, nectarivores, vegetation foragers, vegetation nesters, ground nesters, nest parasites, medium-sized, and very large birds. Our results show that the bird community responds to environmental variables at local and landscape scales. Greater vegetation cover in cities would contribute to greater diversity and evenness of the bird community, promoting the abundance of different guilds, including those sensitive to the built environment.
References
Alberti, M., J. M. Marzluff, E. Shulenberger, G. Bradley, C. Ryan, and C. Zumbrunnen. 2003. Integrating Humans into Ecology: Opportunities and Challenges for Studying Urban Ecosystems. BioScience 53:1169-1179. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2.
Amaya-Espinel, J. D., M. Hostetler, C. Henríquez, and C. Bonacic. 2019. The influence of building density on Neotropical bird communities found in small urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning 190:103578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.05.009.
Arévalo, C., J. D. Amaya‑Espinel, C. Henríquez, J. T. Ibarra, and C. Bonacic. 2022. Urban noise and surrounding city morphology influence green space occupancy by native birds in a Mediterranean‑type South American metropolis. Scientific Reports 12:4471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08654-7.
Badii, M. H., J. Castillo, K. Cortez, A. Wong, and P. Villalpando. 2007. Análisis de correlación canónica (ACC) e investigación científica. Innovaciones de Negocios 4:405-422. https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn4.8-9.
Benito, J. F., M. A. H. Escobar, and N. R. Villaseñor. 2019. Conservación en la ciudad: ¿Cómo influye la estructura del hábitat sobre la abundancia de especies de aves en una metrópoli Latinoamericana? Gayana 83:114-125. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-65382019000200114.
Bingwen, Z. 2014. Urbanización excesiva y urbanización superficial: una comparación entre América Latina y China. En CEPAL (División de Desarrollo Sostenible y Asentamientos Humanos de la Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe). Urbanización y Políticas de vivienda en China y América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago, Chile: Naciones Unidas. Pp. 200.
Caballero, H., G. Varona, and Y. García. 2004. Estructura ecológica de las comunidades de corales de la costa oriental de bahía de cochinos, Cuba. Revista Investigación Marina 25:23-36.
Cadena, P., and L. Letelier. 2018. Determinantes de los Delitos de Mayor Connotación Social en la Región Metropolitana. Análisis en base a un modelo de regresión logística. Política Criminal 13(26):1170-1189. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992018000201170.
Castro, S. A., N. Guerrero-Leiva, M. Bolados, and J. A. Figueroa. 2018. Riqueza y distribución de la flora urbana de Santiago de Chile: una aproximación basada en interpolación IDW. Caderno de Pesquisa 30: 41-54. https://doi.org/10.17058/cp.v30i1.12198.
Chace, J. F., and J. J. Walsh. 2006. Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape and Urban Planning 74:46-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007.
Chao, A. 1984. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 11:265-270. https://doi.org/10.2307/4615964.
Chiquet, C., J. W. Dover, and P. Mitchell. 2013. Birds and the urban environment: the value of green walls. Urban Ecosystems 16:453-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0277-9.
Ciccolella, P., and I. Mignaqui. 2008. Metrópolis latinoamericanas: fragilidad del Estado, proyecto hegemónico y demandas ciudadanas. Algunas reflexiones a partir del caso de Buenos Aires. Cuadernos del Cendes 25(69):47-68.
Clergeau, P., J. P. Savard, G. Mennechez, and G. Falardeau. 1998. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. The Condor 100(3):413-425. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369707.
Codesido, M., C. González-Fischer, and D. Bilenca. 2008. Asociaciones entre diferentes patrones de uso de la tierra y ensambles de aves en agroecosistemas de la región pampeana, Argentina. Ornitología Neotropical 19(suppl.):575-585.
Colding, J., and S. Barthel. 2017. An urban ecology critique on the “Smart City” model. Journal of Cleaner Production 164:95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.191.
Cunha, J. M. P. da, and J. Rodríguez. 2009. Crecimiento urbano y movilidad en América Latina. Revista Latinoamericana de Población 3(4-5):27-64. https://doi.org/10.31406/relap2009.v3.i1.n4-5.1.
Demmert, L. 2001. Construyendo ciudades inseguras: temor y violencia en Argentina. Revista EURE 28(82):5-20. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612001008200001.
Ditchkoff, S., and S. Saalfeld. 2006. Animal behavior in urban ecosystems: modifications due to human-induced stress. Urban Ecosyst 9:5-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-006-3262-3.
Dragoș, M., A. Petrescu, and G. L. Merciu. 2017. Analysis of vegetation from satellite images correlated to the bird species presence and the state of health of the ecosystems of Bucharest during the period from 1991 to 2006. Geographica Pannonica 21:9-25. https://doi.org/10.5937/GeoPan1701009D.
Emlen, J. T. 1974. An urban bird community in Tucson, Arizona: derivation, structure, regulation. The Condor 76:184-197. https://doi.org/10.2307/1366729.
Estades, C. F., and S. Temple. 1999. Diciduous-Forest bird communities in a fragmented landscape dominates by exotic pine plantations. Ecological applications 9:573-585. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0573:DFBCIA]2.0.CO;2.
Estades, C. F. 1995. Aves y vegetación urbana: el caso de las plazas. Boletín Chileno de Ornitología 2:7-13.
Evans, K. L., D. E. Chamberlain, B. J. Hatchwell, R. D. Gregory, and K. J. Gaston. 2011. What makes an urban bird? Global Change Biology 17:32-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02247.x.
Farina, A. 2000. The Cultural Landscape as a Model for the Integration of Ecology an Economics. BioScience 50:313-320. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0313:TCLAAM]2.3.CO;2.
Fernández-Canero, R., and P. González-Redondo. 2010. Green roofs as a habitat for birds: A review. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 9(15):2041-2052. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.2041.2052.
Gago, C., and U. J. Martínez. 2021. Grandes proyectos urbanos en metrópolis latinoamericanas: estudios de caso en el contexto de las prácticas neoliberales. Investigaciones Geográficas 106:e60464.
Grimm, N. B., S. H. Faeth, N. E. Golubiewsky, C. L. Redman, J. Wu, X. Bai, and J. M. Briggs. 2008. Global Change and the Ecology of Cities. Science 319:756-760. 10.1126/science.1150195.
Gutiérrez-Tapia, P., M. I. Azócar, and S. A. Castro. 2018. A citizen-based platform reveals the distribution of functional groups inside a large city from the Southern Hemisphere: e-Bird and the urban birds of Santiago (Central Chile). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 91:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40693-018-0073-x.
Hammer, Ø., D. A. T. Harper, and P. D. Ryan. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4:1-9.
Hernández, H. J., and N. R. Villaseñor. 2018. Twelve-year change in tree diversity and spatial segregation in the Mediterranean city of Santiago, Chile. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 29:10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.017.
Hostetler, M., and C. S. Holling. 2000. Detecting the scales at which birds respond to structure in urban landscapes. Urban Ecosystems 4:25-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009587719462.
IDE Chile 2019. Red Vial Nacional, Infraestructura de Datos Geoespaciales, Santiago, Chile.
INE. Compendio estadístico 2017. Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Turismo, Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas, Santiago, Santiago Chile.
Jaramillo, A. 2005. Aves de Chile. Lynx Ediciones. Barcelona, España.
Kowarik, I. 2011. Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environmental Pollution 159:1974-1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.022.
Lahosa, J. M. 2002. Delincuencia y ciudad. Hacia una reflexión geográfica comprometida. Revista Bibliográfica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales 7(349). URL: ub.es/geocrit/b3w-349.htm.
Land, D., W. R. Marion, and T. E. O’Meara. 1989. Snag availability and cavity nesting birds in slash pine plantations. The Journal of wildlife management 53:1165-1171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3809628.
Lim, H. C., and N. S. Sodhi. 2004. Responses of avian guilds to urbanization in a tropical city. Landscape and Urban Planing 66:199-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00111-7.
López-Calleja, M. V., and F. Bozinovic. 2003. Dynamic energy and time budgets in hummingbirds: a study in Sephanoides sephaniodes. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 134:283-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00263-5.
Luebert, F., and P. Pliscoff. 2006. Sinopsis bioclimática y vegetacional de Chile. Primera edición. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, Santiago, Chile.
MacGregor-Fors, I., and J. F. Escobar-Ibáñez. 2017. Avian Ecology in Latin American Cityscapes. Primera edición. Springer. Xalapa, Veracruz, México. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63475-3.
Marin, M. 2011. Sobre la biología reproductiva de la Diuca (Diuca diuca) en Chile central. Ornitología Neotropical 22:369-378.
Martínez-Piña, D., and G. González-Cifuentes. 2017. Las Aves de Chile. Guía de Campo y Breve Historia Natural. Ediciones del Naturalista. Santiago, Chile.
Marzluff, J. M. 2001. Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. En M Marzluff, R. Bowman and R. Donnelly (eds.). Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Primera edición. Springer, New York, New York, USA. Pp. 425. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9.
Mcgarigal, K., and S. A. Cushman. 2002. Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecological Applications 12:335-345. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0335:CEOEAT]2.0.CO;2.
McKinney, M. L. 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation 27:247-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005.
Medrano, F., R. Barros, H. V. Norambuena, R. Matus, and F. Schmitt. 2018. Atlas de las Aves Nidificantes de Chile. Red de Observadores de Aves y Vida Silvestre de Chile. Santiago, Chile.
Mella, J., and A. Loutit. 2007. Ecología comunitaria y reproductiva de aves en cerros islas y parques de Santiago. Boletín Chileno de Ornitología 13:13-27.
Melles, S., S. Glenn, and K. Martin. 2003. Urban Bird Diversity and Landscape Complexity: Species-environment Associations Along a Multiscale Habitat Gradient. Conservation Ecology 7:5. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-00478-070105.
Miller, J., and R. Hobbs. 2002. Conservation Where People Live and Work. Conservation Biology 16:330-337. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00420.x.
Muñoz, C., and J. L. Celis-Diez. 2016. Observación de un peuquito (Accipiter chilensis) depredando una paloma (Columba livia) en un parque urbano de Santiago, Chile. Revista Chilena de Ornitología 22:197-199.
Muñoz-Pacheco, C. B., and N. R. Villaseñor. 2021. Avian species richness in cities: A review of the Spanish‑language literature from the Southern Cone of South America. Urban Ecosystems https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01180-w.
Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. Mittermeier, G. A. B. da Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501.
Oksanen, J., G. L. Simpson, F. G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P. R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, et al. 2018. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-1. URL: CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
Ordóñez-Delgado, L., C. Iñiguez-Armijos, M. Díaz, A. Escudero, E. Gosselin, L. P. Waits, and C. I. Espinosa. 2022. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Urbanization: Response of a Bird Community in the Neotropical Andes. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10:844944. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.844944.
Orellana, J. I., C. Smith-Ramírez, J. R. Rau, S. Sade, A. Gantz, and C. E. Valdivia. 2014. Phenological synchrony between the austral thrush Turdus falcklandii (Passeriformes: Turdidae) and its food resources within forests and prairies in southern Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 87:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40693-014-0011-5.
Ortega-Álvarez, R., and I. MacGregor-Fors. 2009. Living in the big city: Effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition. Landscape and Urban Planning 90:189-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.003.
Perepelizin, P., and A. M. Faggi. 2009. Diversidad de aves en tres barrios de la ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Multequina 18:71-85.
Poos, M., and D. Jackson. 2012. Addressing the removal of rare species in multivariate bioassessments: The impact of methodological choices. Ecological Indicators 18:82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.10.008.
R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (version 3.6.2), Vienna, Austria. URL: R-project.org.
Rousseau, J. S., J. P. L. Savard, and R. Titman. 2015. Shrub-nesting birds in urban habitats: their abundance and association with vegetation. Urban Ecosystems 18:871-884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0434-4.
Urquiza, A., and J. Mella. 2002. Riqueza y diversidad de aves en parques de Santiago durante el período estival. Boletín Chileno de Ornitología 9:12-21.
Vergara, J. E. 2017. Verticalización. La edificación en altura en la Región Metropolitana de Santiago (1990-2014). Revista Invi 32(90):9-49. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-83582017000200009.
Villaseñor, N. R., M. A. H. Escobar, and H. J. Hernández. 2021. Can aggregated patterns of urban woody vegetation cover promote greater species diversity, richness and abundance of native birds? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 61:127102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127102.
Villaseñor, N. R., and M. A. H. Escobar. 2019. Cemeteries and biodiversity conservation in cities: how do landscape and patch-level attributes influence bird diversity in urban park cemeteries? Urban Ecosystems 22:1037-1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00877-3.
Walker, J. S., and E. Shochat. 2010. Scalar effects of vegetation on bird communities in an urbanizing desert ecosystem. Urban Ecosystems 13:155-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-009-0112-0.
Welch, J. 1994. Street and park trees of Boston: a comparison of urban forest structure. Landscape and Urban Planning 29:131-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)90023-X.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Joaquín F. Foncea, Martín A. H. Escobar, Nélida R. Villaseñor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.
