Choosing between human trash and trashed forests: Resilience in nonvolant Atlantic Forest small mammals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.23.33.3.0.2034Keywords:
bioindicator, impact, rubbish dump, natural regeneration, rainforestAbstract
Open pit rubbish dumps generate serious environmental problems both in Brazil and elsewhere. The goal of this study was to evaluate the occurrence patterns of an assemblage of small flightless mammals in the area of a landfill deactivated 19 years ago. During nine campaigns, three different sites located in a subtropical protected area near the city of Matinhos, Paraná coast, southern Brazil, were sampled. The selected places were an artificial clearing where urban waste had previously been dumped (Area 1), a site with less anthropic influence with tree species and a poorly developed understorey (Area 2), and a site with well-formed vegetation, with herbaceous, shrubby and tree strata well developed (Area 3). The total capture effort was 5210 trap-nights; 109 captures were made of 82 individuals from five species of Rodentia (all from the subfamily Sigmodontinae) and three species of marsupials (Order Didelphimorphia). The most conserved site (Area 3) had higher abundance than areas 1 and 2 (binomial test; P<0.05). Area 1, considered the most affected, showed less species richness (n=6) than the other two areas (7 and 8 species), although this may be affected by the lower number of captures. The diversity in Area 1, estimated by the Shannon index, was lower than in areas 2 and 3 (Hutcheson’s t tests; H’=1.26 for Area 1 vs. 1.76 and 1.68 for Areas 2 and 3, respectively), although the composition of the assemblage did not differ significantly between the areas (PERMANOVA; P=0.085). Our results show that even after 19 years of inactivity, the deposited waste is still having a negative impact on the environment, and highlight the resilience of some native small mammal species in exploiting the resources of degraded areas.
References
Ayres, M., M. Ayres-Jr., D. L. Ayres, A. de A. S. Dos Santos, and L. L. Ayres. 2007. BioEstat. Aplicações Estatísticas nas äreas das Ciências Bio-Médicas. Sociedade Civil Mamirauá/CNPq, Belém.
Briani, D. C., A. R. T. Palma, E. M. Vieira, and R. P. B. Henriques. 2004. Post-fire succession of small mammals in the Cerrado of central Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:1023-1037. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000014467.27138.0b.
Carballido, M. F., P. Arístide, M. Busch, E. A. Cittadino, and I. E. G. Villafañe. 2011. Are the closed landfills recovered habitats for small rodents? A case study in a riparian site, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Urban Ecosystems 14:699-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0167-6.
Dexter, E., G. Rollwagen‐Bollens, and S. M. Bollens. 2018. The trouble with stress: A flexible method for the evaluation of nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Limnology and Oceanography Methods 16(7):434-443. https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10257.
Dobson, M. C., and A. J. Moffat. 1999. Examination of tree and root performance on closed landfills in Merseyside. Arboricultural Journal 23:261-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.1999.9747244.
Dueser, R. D., and H. H. Shugart-Jr. 1978. Microhabitats in a forest-floor small mammal fauna. Ecology 59:89-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936634.
Espinoza, P. T., E. Martínez A., D. Daza, M. S. Faure, and H. Terraza. 2010. Regional Evaluation on Urban Solid Waste Management in Latin America and the Caribbean - 2010. Report. Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), Lima, Perú.
Fischer, C., C. Thies, and T. Tscharntke. 2011. Small mammals in agricultural landscapes: Opposing responses to farming practices and landscape complexity. Biological Conservation 144:1130-1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.032.
Gatto-Almeida, F., Á. C. Ferreguetti, J. S. Pontes, L. M. Tiepolo, and I. Hass. 2020. The Atlantic Forest as a barrier to invasive rodents: study of a seaport in southern Brazil. Hystrix 31:87-93.
Gatto-Almeida, F., J. S. Pontes, I. J. Sbalqueiro, I. Hass, L. M. Tiepolo, and J. Quadros. 2016. Diversidade, biogeografia, caracterização cariotípica e tricológica dos pequenos mamíferos não voadores do Parque Estadual Rio da Onça, Litoral Sul do Paraná. Papéis Avulsos em Zoologia 56:69-96. https://doi.org/10.11606/0031-1049.2016.56.07.
Grazzini, G., C. M. Mochi-Jr., H. Oliveira, J. S. Pontes, F. Gatto-Almeida, and L. M. Tiepolo. 2015. Identidade, riqueza e abundância de pequenos mamíferos (Rodentia e Didelphimorphia) de área de Floresta com Araucária no Estado do Paraná, Brasil. Papeis Avulsos em Zoologia 55:217-230. https://doi.org/10.1590/0031-1049.2015.55.15.
Griffiths, A. D., S. T. Garnett, and B. W. Brook. 2015. Fire frequency matters more than fire size: Testing the pyrodiversity-biodiversity paradigm for at-risk small mammals in an Australian tropical savanna. Biological Conservation 186:337-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.021.
Hammer, Ø., D. A. T. Harper, and P. D. Ryan. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4:1-9.
Holling, C. S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:1-23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245.
Holling, C. S., and L. H. Gunderson. 2002. Resilience and adaptive cycles. Pp. 25-62 in L. H. Gunderson and C. S. Holling (eds.). Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. 1st ed. Island Press, Washingto, USA.
Hutcheson, K. 1970. A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. Journal of Theoretical Biology 29:151-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(70)90124-4.
Johnstone, C. P., A. Lill, and R. D. Reina. 2014. Habitat loss, fragmentation and degradation effects on small mammals: Analysis with conditional inference tree statistical modelling. Biological Conservation 176:80-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.04.025.
Kaza, S., L. Yao, P. Bhada-Tata, and F. Van Woerden. 2018. What a Waste 2.0 - A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Urban Development Series, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0.
Kutiel, P., Y. Peled, and E. Geffen. 2000. The effect of removing shrub cover on annual plants and small mammals in a coastal sand dune ecosystem. Biological Conservation 94:235-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00172-X.
Lyons, S., L. Murphy, and R. S. J. Tol. 2010. Estimating historical landfill quantities to predict methane emissions. Atmospheric Environment 44:3901-3906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.07.022.
Martin, P. S., C. Gheler-Costa, P. C. Lopes, L. M. Rosalino, and L. M. Verdade. 2012. Terrestrial nonvolant small mammals in agro-silvicultural landscapes of Southeastern Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 282:185-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.002.
Monamy, V., and B. J. Fox. 2000. Small mammal succession is determined by vegetation density rather than time elapsed since disturbance. Austral Ecology 25:580-587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2000.tb00063.x.
Moro, D., and S. Gadal. 2007. Benefits of habitat restoration to small mammal diversity and abundance in a pastoral agricultural landscape in mid-Wales. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:3543-3557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9104-z.
Naxara, L., B. T. Pinotti, and R. Pardini. 2009. Seasonal microhabitat selection by terrestrial rodents in an old-growth Atlantic forest. Journal of Mammalogy 90:404-415. https://doi.org/10.1644/08-MAMM-A-100.1.
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P.R., O'Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H., Szoecs, E., and Wagner, H. (2019) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-6. URL: CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
Olifiers, N., R. Gentile, and J. T. Fiszon. 2005. Relation between small-mammal species composition and anthropic variables in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 65:495-501. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842005000300015.
Pardini, R. 2004. Effects of forest fragmentation on small mammals in an Atlantic Forest landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:2567-2586. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000048452.18878.2d.
Pardini, R., S. Marques, D. Souza, R. Braga-Neto, and J. Paul. 2005. The role of forest structure, fragment size and corridors in maintaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape. Biological Conservation 124:253-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.033.
Pardini, R., and F. Umetsu. 2006. Pequenos mamíferos não-voadores da Reserva Florestal do Morro Grande - distribuição das espécies e da diversidade em uma área de Mata Atlântica. Biota Neotropica 6:1-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032006000200007.
Pastor, J., and A. J. Hernández. 2012. Heavy metals, salts and organic residues in old solid urban waste landfills and surface waters in their discharge areas: Determinants for restoring their impact. Journal of Environmental Management 95:S42-S49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.048.
Penteado, R., M. Cavalli, E. Magnano, and F. Chiampo. 2012. Application of the IPCC model to a Brazilian landfill: First results. Energy Policy 42:551-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.023.
Pianka, E. R. 1994. Biotic Diversity and Community Stability. In E. R. Pianka (ed). Evolutionary Ecology. 5th ed. HCC Publishers, New York, USA.
Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation. The American Naturalist 132:652-661. https://doi.org/10.1086/284880.
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: R-project.org.
Regadío, M., A. I. Ruiz, I. S. de Soto, M. Rodríguez Rastrero, N. Sánchez, et al. 2012. Pollution profiles and physicochemical parameters in old uncontrolled landfills. Waste Management 32:482-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.008.
Roderjan, C. V. 1988. Caracterização da vegetação do Parque Florestal do Rio da Onça. Instituto Ambiental do Paraná - IAP, Curitiba.
Salinas, H., and D. Ramírez-Delgado. 2021. ecolTest: Community Ecology Tests. R Package Version 0.01. URL: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ecolTest.
Santos-Filho, M., C. A. Peres, D. J. da Silva, and T. M. Sanaiotti. 2012. Habitat patch and matrix effects on small-mammal persistence in Amazonian forest fragments. Biodiversity and Conservation 21:1127-1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0248-8.
Trotter, D. H., and J. A. Cooke. 2005. Influence of landfill gas on the microdistribution of grass establishment through natural colonization. Environmental Management 35:303-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0308-7.
Umetsu, F., and R. Pardini. 2007. Small mammals in a mosaic of forest remnants and anthropogenic habitats - evaluating matrix quality in an Atlantic forest landscape. Landscape Ecology 22:517-530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9041-y.
Umetsu, F., J. Paul Metzger, and R. Pardini. 2008. Importance of estimating matrix quality for modeling species distribution in complex tropical landscapes: a test with Atlantic forest small mammals. Ecography 31:359-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.05302.x.
Vieira, E. M., and N. F. Camargo. 2012. Uso do espaço vertical por marsupiais brasileiros. Pp. 345-362 in N. C. Caceres (ed.). Os marsupiais do Brasil꞉ Biologia, Ecologia e Conservação. 2nd edition. Editora UFMS, Campo Grande.
Yamada, T., S. Yoshida, T. Hosaka, and T. Okuda. 2016. Logging residues conserve small mammalian diversity in a Malaysian production forest. Biological Conservation 194:100-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.004.
Zhang, M., Y. Wang, B. Li, C. Guo, G. Huang, et al. 2014. Small mammal community succession on the beach of Dongting Lake, China after the Three Gorges Project. Integrative Zoology 9:294-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12073.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fernanda Gatto-Almeida, Juliana Quadros, Liliani Marilia Tiepolo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.
