Can artificial perches attract seed-dispersing birds in disturbed dry montane forests?

Authors

  • Viviana S. Berrios Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa) y Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Salta, Argentina
  • Andrés Tálamo Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA (IBIGEO), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa). Salta, Argentina
  • Enrique J. Derlindati Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa). Salta, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.24.34.1.0.2179

Keywords:

ecological restoration, Tyrannidae, Corvidae, natural perches, secondary forest remnants, distance to forest edge, fires

Abstract

The subtropical montane forests of northwest Argentina are among the biomes with the highest restoration priority worldwide. Disturbances due to burning and overgrazing turned some sectors into pastures, but there are still secondary forest remnants with diverse birdlife that could provide effective dispersers to the sites to be restored. The lack of vertebrate-mediated seed dispersal limits the recovery of disturbed forests. An ecological restoration tool that can enhance the seed dispersal by birds is the use of artificial perches. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of this perches in attracting seed-dispersing birds. We work in an area formerly affected by fires and livestock, where we installed 24 artificial perches and selected 24 natural perches at two distances from the remaining forest. We recorded the diversity of birds at 20-m-radius bird-watching points in forest remnants and on artificial and natural perches in disturbed areas for 15 minutes in the morning, two consecutive days every 15 days in summer. We found differences in the species composition of forest remnants, artificial perches, and natural perches from disturbed sites, but we did not find differences in the species composition as a function of the distance of the perches from the forest edge. Neither did we find effects on the abundance of birds depending on the type of perch or the distance to the edge of the forest. Artificial perches were more attractive than natural perches for tyranid and corvid dispersers; however, they were not used by the characteristic frugivores of secondary forest remnants.

References

Albornoz, F. E., A. Gaxiola, B. J. Seaman, F. I. Pugnaire, and J. Armesto. 2013. Nucleation-driven regeneration promotes post-fire recovery in a Chilean temperate forest. Plant Ecology 214:765-776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-013-0206-x.

Albrecht, J., D. G. Berens, N. Blüthgen, B. Jaroszewicz, N. Selva, et al. 2013. Logging and forest edges reduce redundancy in plant–frugivore networks in an old‐growth European forest. Journal of Ecology 101(4):990-999. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12105.

Alderete, C., and P. Capllonch. 2010. Pesos de aves suboscines de Argentina. Nótulas Faunísticas, 2da. Serie 58:1-12.

Alencar, L., and E. Guilherme. 2020. Bird-plant interactions on the edge of a forest fragment in southwestern Brazilian Amazonia. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences 42:1-11. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v42i1.51485.

Alessio, V. G., A. H. Beltzer, R. C. Lajmanovich, and M. A. Quiroga. 2005. Ecología alimentaria de algunas especies de Passeriformes (Furnariidae, Tyrannidae, Icteridae y Emberizidae): consideraciones sobre algunos aspectos del nicho ecológico. Temas de la Biodiversidad del Litoral fluvial argentino II INSUGEO, Miscelánea 14:441-482.

Athiê, S., and M. M. Dias. 2016. Use of perches and seed dispersal by birds in an abandoned pasture in the Porto Ferreira state park, southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 76:80-92. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.13114.

Bates, D., M. Mächler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1):1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

Bibby, C. J., N. D. Burgess, D. A. Hill, and S. Mustoe. 2000. Bird census techniques. Second edition. Elsevier. London, UK.

Blake, J. G., and B. A. Loiselle. 2009. Species composition of Neotropical understory bird communities: local versus regional perspectives based on capture data. Biotropica 41(1):85-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00445.x.

Castilhos de Freitas, T., G. Crizel Gomes, A. Ramos Molina, E. de Souza Gomes Guarino, C. Agra Iserhard, et al. 2022. Artificial perches increase bird-mediated seed rain in agricultural fallow area in southern Brazil. Web Ecology 22(2):59-74. https://doi.org/10.5194/we-22-59-2022.

Cavallero, L., E. Raffaele, and M. A. Aizen. 2013. Birds as mediators of passive restoration during early post-fire recovery. Biological Conservation 158:342-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.004.

Chazdon, R. L. 2003. Tropical Forest Recovery: Legacies of Human Impact and Natural Disturbances. Anon. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 6(1-2):51-71. https://doi.org/10.1078/1433-8319-00042.

Cintra, R. 1997. Spatial distribution and foraging tactics of tyrant flycatchers in two habitats in the Brazilian Amazon. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 32(1):17-27. https://doi.org/10.1076/snfe.32.1.17.13459.

Da Silva, J. M. C., C. Uhl, and G. Murray. 1996. Plant succession, landscape management, and the ecology of frugivorous birds in abandoned Amazonian pastures. Conservation Biology 10(2):491-503. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020491.x.

del Hoyo, J., A. Elliott, J. Sargatal, D. A. Christie, and E. de Juana. 2020. Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

Dos Santos, M. M. G., and V. de Patta Pillar. 2007. Influência de poleiros naturais e artificiais na expansão da Floresta com Araucária sobre os campos, em São Francisco de Paula, RS. Revista Brasileira de Biociências 5(S1):594-596.

Fontúrbel, F. E., A. B. Candia, J. Malebrán, D. A. Salazar, C. González‐Browne, et al. 2015. Meta‐analysis of anthropogenic habitat disturbance effects on animal‐mediated seed dispersal. Global Change Biology 21(11):3951-3960. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13025.

Gabriel, V. D. A., and M. A. Pizo. 2005. Foraging behavior of tyrant flycatchers (Aves, Tyrannidae) in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 22:1072-1077. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752005000400036.

Galetti, M., R. Guevara, and M. C. Cortes. 2013. Functional extinction of birds drives rapid evolutionary changes in seed size. Science 340:1086-1090. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1233774.

Graham, L. L., and S. E. Page. 2012. Artificial bird perches for the regeneration of degraded tropical peat swamp forest: a restoration tool with limited potential. Restoration Ecology 20(5):631-637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00805.x.

Grau, H. R., J. Carilla, R. Gil-Montero, R. Villalba, E. Araoz, et al. 2010. Environmental history and forest regeneration dynamics in a degraded valley of north-west Argentina’s cloud forests. Pp. 597-604 en L. A. Bruijnzeel, F. N. Scatena and L. S. Hamilton (eds.). Tropical Montane Cloud Forests Science for Conservation and Management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778384.064.

Guidetti, B. Y., G. C. Amico, S. Dardanelli, and M. A. Rodríguez-Cabal. 2016. Artificial perches promote vegetation restoration. Plant Ecology 217(7):935-942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0619-4.

Guidetti, B. Y., S. Dardanelli, F. M. L. Miño, and G. C. Amico. 2022. Artificial Perches for Birds in Deforested Areas Favour a Seed Rain Similar to Woodland Remnants. Plant Ecology 223:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-022-01272-3.

Herrera, C. M. 2002. Seed dispersal by vertebrates. Pp. 185-208 en C. M Herrera and O. Pellmyr (eds.). Plant- animal interactions: An evolutionary approach. Blackwell USA.

Holl, K. D. 1998. Do bird perching structures elevate seed rain and seedling establishment in abandoned tropical pasture? Restoration Ecology 6(3):253-261. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.1998.00638.x.

Holl, K. D. 2002. Effect of shrubs on tree seedling establishment in an abandoned tropical pasture. Journal of Ecology 90(1):179-187. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00637.x.

Hutto, R. L., S. M. Pletschet, and P. Hendricks. 1986. A fixed-radius point count method for nonbreeding and breeding season use. The Auk 103(3):593-602. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/103.3.593.

Jetz, W., D. S. Wilcove, and A. P. Dobson. 2007. Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global biodiversity of birds. PLOS Biology 5(6):e157. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050157.

John, R. 2004. Volume 9 Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails. Pp. 631 en J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott and D. Christie (eds.). Handbook of Birds of the World. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain. https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v118i4.843.

Lundberg, J., and F. Moberg. 2003. Mobile link organisms and ecosystem functioning: implications for ecosystem resilience and management. Ecosystems 6(1):0087-0098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0150-4.

McClanahan, T. R., and R. W. Wolfe. 1993. Accelerating forest succession in a fragmented landscape: the role of birds and perches. Conservation Biology 7(2):279-288. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07020279.x.

McConkey, K. R., S. Prasad, R. T. Corlett, A. Campos-Arceiz, J. F. Brodie, et al. 2012. Seed dispersal in changing landscapes. Biological Conservation 146(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.018.

McDonnell, M. J., and E. W. Stiles. 1983. The structural complexity of old field vegetation and the recruitment of bird-dispersed plant species. Oecologia 56(1):109-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378225.

McIntyre, S., and R. Hobbs. 1999. A framework for conceptualizing human effects on landscapes and its relevance to management and research models. Conservation Biology 13(6):1282-1292. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97509.x.

Navarro, G., and M. Maldonado (eds.). 2002. Geografía ecológica de Bolivia: Vegetación y ambientes acuáticos. Centro de Ecología Simón I. Patiño, Departamento de Difusión, Cochabamba, Bolivia. Pp. 719.

Neumann, R., J. Samaniego, C. Matalía, F. Lisi, and J. L Garrido (eds.). 1994. Reserva Forestal y De Fauna En Campo Alegre. Proyecto C.A.M. Anon. 1. Club Amigos de la Montaña. Salta, Argentina.

Oliveira, A. K. M., R. A. Bocchese, K. R. F. Pereira, and Carvalho. 2018. Seed deposition by birds on artificial perches at different distances from a gallery forest in the cerrado area. Floresta 48(3):363-372. https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v48i3.55228.

Padrón, B., M. Nogales, A. Traveset, M. Vila, A. Martínez-Abraín, et al. 2011. Integration of invasive Opuntia spp. by native and alien seed dispersers in the Mediterranean area and the Canary Islands. Biological Invasions 13(4):831-844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9872-y.

R Core Team 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: R-project.org.

Rougès, M., and J. G. Blake. 2001. Tasas de captura y dietas de aves del sotobosque en el Parque Biológico Sierra de San Javier, Tucumán. Hornero 16(1):7-15. https://doi.org/10.56178/eh.v16i1.909.

Scott, R., P. Pattanakaew, J. F. Maxwell, S. Elliott, and G. Gale. 2000. The effect of artificial perches and local vegetation on bird-dispersed seed deposition into regenerating sites. Pp 327-337 en S. Elliott, J. Kerby, D. Blakesley, K. Hardwick, K. Woods and V. Anusarnsunthorn (eds.). Forest Restoration for Wildlife Conservation. International Tropical Timber Organization and the Forest Restoration Research Unit, Chiang Mai University.

Secretaria de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable (SADS). 2014. Estadística de incendios forestales 2013. Programa Nacional de Estadística Forestal. Secretaria de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable. Informe Técnico, Salta, Argentina. Pp. 131.

Shiels, A., and L. Walker. 2003. Bird perches increase forest seeds on Puerto Rican landslides. Restoration Ecology 11:457-465. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.rec0269.x.

Slocum, M. G., and C. C. Horvitz. 2000. Seed arrival under different genera of trees in a neotropical pasture. Plant Ecology 149:51-6. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009892821864.

Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) International, Grupo de trabajo sobre ciencia y políticas. 2004. Principios de SER International sobre la restauración ecológica.

Stouffer, P. C., R. T. Chesser, and A. E. Jahn. 2020. Tropical Kingbird (Tyrannus melancholicus). Version 1.0. En S. M. Billerman (ed.). Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.trokin.01.

Tobias, J. A., C. Sheard, A. L. Pigot, A. J. Devenish, J. Yang, F. Sayol, et al. 2022. AVONET: morphological, ecological and geographical data for all birds. Ecology Letters 25(3):581-597. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13898.

Tomazi, A. L., C. E. Zimmermann, and R. R. Laps. 2010. Poleiros artificiais como modelo de nucleação para restauração de ambientes ciliares: caracterização da chuva de sementes e regeneração natural. Biotemas 23:125-135. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2010v23n3p125.

Valiente‐Banuet, A., M. A. Aizen, J. M. Alcántara, J. Arroyo, A. Cocucci, et al. 2015. Beyond species loss: the extinction of ecological interactions in a changing world. Functional Ecology 29(3):299-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12356.

Vicente-González, L., and J. L. Vicente-Villardon. 2021. PERMANOVA: Multivariate Analysis of Variance Based on Distances and Permutations. R package version 0.2.0. URL: CRAN.R-project.org/package=PERMANOVA.

Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York.

Young, T. P. 2000. Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Biological Conservation 92(10):73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00057-9.

Zanini, L., and G. Ganade. 2005. Restoration of Araucaria Forest: the role of perches, pioneer vegetation, and soil fertility. Restoration Ecology 13(3):507-514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00063.x.

Published

2024-02-13

How to Cite

Berrios, V. S., Tálamo, A., & Derlindati, E. J. (2024). Can artificial perches attract seed-dispersing birds in disturbed dry montane forests?. Ecología Austral, 34(1), 096–105. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.24.34.1.0.2179