Fifty years of research on South American drylands: Mapping the scientific contributions of the Argentine Institute for Dryland Research

Solana Tabeni; M. Florencia Miguel; Diego P. Vázquez; S. Yasmin Bobadilla; Andrea P. Tarquino-Carbonell; Vanina Egea; Agustina A. Ojeda

doi:10.25260/EA.24.34.1.0.2244

Authors

Solana Tabeni Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas (IADIZA), CCT-CONICET Mendoza, UNCuyo, Gobierno de Mendoza
Dr Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas (IADIZA), CCT-CONICET Mendoza, UNCuyo, Gobierno de Mendoza
Dr Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas (IADIZA), CCT-CONICET Mendoza, UNCuyo, Gobierno de Mendoza
S. Yasmin Bobadilla Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas (IADIZA), CCT-CONICET Mendoza, UNCuyo, Gobierno de Mendoza
Andrea P. Tarquino-Carbonell Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas (IADIZA), CCT-CONICET Mendoza, UNCuyo, Gobierno de Mendoza
Vanina Egea Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas (IADIZA), CCT-CONICET Mendoza, UNCuyo, Gobierno de Mendoza
Agustina A. Ojeda Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas (IADIZA), CCT-CONICET Mendoza, UNCuyo, Gobierno de Mendoza

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.24.34.1.0.2244

Keywords:

arid ecosystems, bibliometric analysis, knowledge evolution, scientific knowledge, temporal analysis

Abstract

Dryland ecosystems are among the most widespread biomes on Earth and sustain nearly 40% of the global human population. Knowledge on drylands throughout the world has come from diverse disciplinary fields including natural and social sciences. The use of quantitative tools, such as science mapping or bibliometric analysis, may help to explore the structure of knowledge and to identify emerging issues. Here, we analyzed the dynamics of scientific production on dryland ecosystems throughout fifty years since the creation of the Argentine Institute for Dryland Research (IADIZA). We focused on IADIZA as a case study because it is one of the oldest dryland research institutions in South America whose contributions may exemplify research trajectories in drylands. We conducted a systematic search in Scopus for the 1972-2022 period, complemented with the institute’s records, which resulted in 1828 publications. We identified 48 research themes studied at IADIZA. The diversity of themes has increased through time, moving from the early descriptive studies of species and communities to the current focus on pa�erns and processes. From 2000 to the present, we detected a remarkable incorporation of new concepts, indicating that the conservation and management of natural resources, the systematics and taxonomy of species and ecological interactions constitute the central research themes, along with emerging themes such as genetics, evolution and urban ecology. In conclusion, our synthesis offers a clear description of the dynamics of research themes in the study of drylands and indicates a growing international interest in IADIZA’s contributions to dryland functioning.

References

Armas, C., J. R. Gutiérrez, D. A. Kelt and P. L. Meserve. 2016. Twenty-five years of research in the north-central Chilean semiarid zone: the Fray Jorge Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research (LTSER) site and Norte Chico. Journal of Arid Environments 126:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.12.008.

Azoulay, P., J. Graff-Zivin, B. Uzzi, D. Wang, H. Williams, J. A. Evans, et al. 2018. Toward a more scientific science. Science 361(6408):1194-1197. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav2484.

Behnke, R. H., and M. Mortimore (eds.). 2016. The End of Desertification? Disputing Environmental Change in the Drylands. Springer Earth System Sciences. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Pp. 560. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16014-1.

Björk, B. C., A. Roos, and M. Lauri. 2008. Global annual volume of peer reviewed scholarly articles and the share available via different Open Access options. Proceedings of ELPUB.

Callon, M., J. Courtial, and F. Laville. 1991. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research - The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 22(1):155-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280.

Castro, A. J., C. Quintas-Soriano, and B. N. Egoh. 2018. Ecosystem services in dryland systems of the world. Journal of Arid Environments 159:1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2018.09.006.

Chen, C. 2017. Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of data and information science 2(2):1-40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006.

Chen, R. H. G., and C. M. Chen. 2016. Visualizing the world’s scientific publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67(10):2477-2488. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23591.

Chen, W., Y. Geng, S. Zhong, M. Zhuang, and H. Pan. 2020. A bibliometric analysis of ecosystem services evaluation from 1997 to 2016. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27(19):23503-23513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08760-x.

Coban, O., G. B. De Deyn, and M. van der Ploeg. 2022. Soil microbiota as game-changers in restoration of degraded lands. Science 375(6584):abe0725. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe0725.

Cobo, M. J., A. G. López‐Herrera, E. Herrera‐Viedma, and F. Herrera. 2011. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(7):1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525.

Cobo, M. J., A. G. López‐Herrera, E. Herrera‐Viedma, and F. Herrera. 2012. SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(8):1609-1630. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22688.

Davis, D. K. 2016. Deserts and Drylands Before the Age of Desertification. Pp. 203-223 in R. Behnke and M. Mortimore (eds.). The End of Desertification? Springer Earth System Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16014-1_8.

Enserink, M. 2018. Research on research. Science 1178-1179. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.361.6408.117.

Evans, J. A. 2008. Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship. Science 321(5887):395-399. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150473.

Fortunato, S., C. T. Bergstrom, K. Börner, J. A. Evans, D. Helbing, S. Milojević, et al. 2018. Science of science. Science 359(6379):eaao0185. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao018.

Gonçalves, P. H. S., T. Gonçalves-Souza, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2020. Chronic anthropogenic disturbances in ecology: a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics 123(2):1103-1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03403-x.

Guan, Y., R. Kang, and J. Liu. 2019. Evolution of the field of ecological restoration over the last three decades: a bibliometric analysis. Restoration Ecology 27(3):647-660. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12899.

Hackett, E. J., E. Leahey, J. N. Parker, I. Rafols, S. E. Hampton, U. Corte, et al. 2021. Do synthesis centers synthesize? A semantic analysis of topical diversity in research. Research Policy 50(1):104069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104069.

Hanan, N. P., E. Milne, E. Aynekulu, Q. Yu, and J. Anchang. A Role for Drylands in a Carbon

Neutral World? 2021. Front Environ Sci 9: 786087. https://doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.786087.

Hu, H., J. Dai, Y. Jin, and X. Liu. 2021. Bibliometric analysis on desertification restoration based on CiteSpace. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 14:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06309-3.

Hulme, P. E. 2022. Importance of greater interdisciplinarity and geographic scope when tackling the driving forces behind biological invasions. Conservation Biology 36(2):e13817. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13817.

Hutchinson, C. F., and S. M. Herrmann. 2007. The future of arid lands-revisited: a review of 50 years of drylands research (Vol. 32). Springer Science and Business Media.

Jinha, A. E. 2010. Article 50 million: An estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence. Learned Publishing 23(3):258-263. https://doi.org/10.1087/20100308.

Katz, J. S., and B. R. Martin. 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26(1):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1.

Kennedy, C. M., J. R. Oakleaf, D. M. Theobald, S. Baruch-Mordo, and J. Kiesecker. 2019. Managing the middle: a shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient. Global Change Biology 25(3):811-826. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14549.

Lang, D., and G. Chien. 2018. wordcloud2: Create Word Cloud by ‘htmlwidget’. R package version 0.2.1. URL: CRAN.R-project.org/package=wordcloud2.

Liu, X., L. Zhang, and S. Hong. 2011. Global biodiversity research during 1900-2009: a bibliometric analysis. Biodiversity and Conservation 20(4):807-826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9981-z.

QGIS Development Team 2022. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. URL: qgis.osgeo.org.

Maestre, F. T., B. M. Benito, M. Berdugo, L. Concostrina‐Zubiri, M. Delgado‐Baquerizo, D. J. Eldridge, et al. 2021. Biogeography of global drylands. New Phytologist 231(2):540-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17395.

Miguel, M. F., H. S. Butterfield, and C. J. Lortie. 2020. A meta-analysis contrasting active versus passive restoration practices in dryland agricultural ecosystems. PeerJ 8:e10428. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10428.

Meyer, D., A. Zeileis, and K. Hornik. 2020. vcd: Visualizing Categorical Data. R package version 1.4-8.

Noyons, E., H. Moed, and A. Van Raan.1999. Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping. Scientometrics 46(3):591-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02459614.

R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: R-project.org.

Ramankutty, N., A. T. Evan, C. Monfreda, and J. A. Foley. 2008. Farming the planet: 1. geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 22:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002952.

Reynolds, J. F. 2021. Desertification is a prisoner of history: An essay on why young scientists should care. Ecosistemas 30(3):2302. https://doi.org/10.7818/ECOS.2302.

Roig, V. 1991. Desertification and distribution of mammals in the Southern Cone of South America. Parte III Conservation policy and management. Pp. 239-279 in M. A. Mares and D. J. Schmidly (eds.). Latin American Mammalogy. History, biodiversity and conservation. University of Oklahoma Press.

Samoylenko, I., T. C. Chao, W. C. Liu, and C. M. Chen. 2006. Visualizing the scientific world and its evolution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(11):1461-1469. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20450.

Schimel, D. S. 2010. Drylands in the earth system. Science 327(5964):418-419. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1184946.

Shi, Y. F., F. F. Huang, S. H. Shi, Y. S. Jiang, and X. M. Huang. 2021. Research trends and focus on the deserts of Northern China: A bibliometric analysis during 1986-2020. Frontiers in Earth Science 9:1064. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.777626.

Shiffrin, R. M., and K. Börner. 2004. Mapping knowledge domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(suppl_1):5183-5185. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307852100.

Silcock, J. L., and R. J. Fensham. 2019. Degraded or just dusty? Examining ecological change in arid lands. Bioscience 69(7):508-522. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz054.

Sivakumar, M. V., and R. Stefanski. 2007. Climate and land degradation—an overview. Pp. 105-135 in M. V. Sivakumar and R. Stefanski (eds.). Climate and land degradation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Stork, H., and J. J. Astrin. 2014. Trends in biodiversity research—a bibliometric assessment. Open Journal of Ecology 4(07):354. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2014.47033.

Veth, P. 2005. Between the desert and the sea: Archaeologies of the Western Desert and Pilbara regions, Australia. Pp. 132-141 in M. A. Smith and P. Hesse (eds.). 23 Degrees South: The Archaeology and Environmental History of Southern Hemisphere Deserts. National Museum of Australia Press.

Vieira, E. S. 2023. The influence of research collaboration on citation impact: the countries in the European Innovation Scoreboard. Scientometrics 128:3555-3579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04715-4.

Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York.

Whitford, W. G. 2002. Ecology of desert systems. Page xvi. Pp. 343. Framework. Academic Press. URL: books.google.com/books.

Wuchty, S., B. F. Jones, and B. Uzzi. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036-1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099.

Xie, H., Y. Zhang, Z. Wu, and T. Lv. 2020. A bibliometric analysis on land degradation: Current status, development, and future directions. Land 9(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9010028.

Zhang, Y., and Y. Chen. 2020. Research trends and areas of focus on the Chinese Loess Plateau: A bibliometric analysis during 1991-2018. Catena 194:104798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104798.

Zhang, X., R. C. Estoque, H. Xie, Y. Murayama, and M. Ranagalage. 2019. Bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles on ecosystem services. PLOS ONE 14(2):e0210707. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210707.