This is an outdated version published on 2025-03-09. Read the most recent version.

The roles of natural history during ecological research

Authors

  • Luis Marone Desert Community Ecology Research Team (ECODES), Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas (IADIZA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Mendoza, Argentina
  • Fabián M. Jaksic Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile and Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES). Santiago, Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.1.0.2482

Keywords:

assumption, epistemology, explanation, hypothesis, prediction, problematization

Abstract

It is commonly posited that natural history is an essentially descriptive activity focused on local case studies, lacking an explicit link with theory. Still, some authors suggest that patient observation of natural history must be valued as ‘an essential first step in the scientific method’. We think that there is a strong connection between ecology and natural history, and thus delve into such relationship to propose that a) natural history observations are necessary for science problematization (i.e., for the detection of meaningful ecological research problems) and, in some specific contexts, for generating low-level or pattern hypotheses. Notwithstanding, these natural history observations themselves play a secondary role in inspiring explanatory, mechanismic or theoretical hypotheses, and b) a fundamental role of natural history during ecological research is to provide key assumptions (i.e., initial conditions) used to define the experimental design and collect the appropriate data, as well as to deduce hypotheses and predictions. This latter function fruitfully articulates natural history with ecological theory.

References

Allen, J. F. 2001. Bioinformatics and discovery: induction beckons again. BioEssays 23:104-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-1878(200101)23:1%3C104::AID-BIES1013%3E3.3.CO;2-U.

Anderson, J. G. T. 2017. Why Ecology needs Natural History. American Scientist 105:290-297. https://doi.org/10.1511/2017.105.5.290.

Baker, M., and D. Penny. 2016. Is there a reproducibility crisis? Nature 533:452-454. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a.

Berryman, A. A. 2003. On principles, laws and theory in population ecology. Oikos 103:695-701. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12810.x.

Bunge, M. 1998. Philosophy of science. Revised Edition. Transaction, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315126371.

Bunge, M. 2001 [1963]. Induction in science. Pp. 142-152 in M. Mahner (ed.). Scientific realism. Selected essays of Mario Bunge. Prometheus Books, New York.

Camín, S. R., V. R. Cueto, J. Lopez de Casenave, and L. Marone. 2015. Exploring food preferences and the limits of feeding flex¬ibility of seed-eating desert birds. Emu 115:261-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.02875.

Camín, S. R., I. Figgini, and L. Marone. 2022. ¿Predicen los rasgos biológicos de las aves su ocupación del gradiente de urbanización en el área metropolitana de Mendoza? Ecología Austral 32:1078-1088. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.3.0.1862.

Colyvan, M., and L. R. Ginzburg. 2003. Laws of nature and laws of ecology. Oikos 101:649-653. https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0706.2003.12349.X.

Colyvan, M., and L. R. Ginzburg. 2010. Analogical thinking in Ecology: Looking beyond disciplinary boundaries. The Quarterly Review of Biology 85:171-182. https://doi.org/10.1086/652321.

Cousens, R. D. 2023. Effective Ecology: Seeking Success in a Hard Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003314332.

Elton, C. S. 1927. Animal ecology. Sidgwick and Jackson, London. ISBN 13:9780412200809.

Fleischner, T. L. 2001. Natural History and the spiral of offering. Wild Earth 11:10-13.

Friedman, J., and A. Van Natto. 2023. Assembling the ecological puzzle. Pp. 81-94 in R. D. Cousens (ed.). Effective Ecology: Seeking Success in a Hard Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003314332-6.

Jaksic, F. M. 1981. Recognition of morphological adaptations in animals: The hypothetico-deductive method. BioScience 31:667-670. https://doi.org/10.2307/1308640.

Jaksic, F. M. 1999. ¿Qué fue de la Historia Natural? Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 72:5-6.

Jaksic, F. M. 2022. Historical account and current ecological knowledge of the southernmost lizard in the world, Liolaemus magellanicus (Squamata: Liolaemidae). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 95:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40693-022-00112-y.

Kaiser, J. 2021. Key cancer results failed to be reproduced. Science 374:1311. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.acx9788.

Laudan, L. 1981. Science and hypotheses: historical essays on scientific methodology. D. Reidel Publishing Co, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7288-0.

Leveau, L. M., J. Jokimaki, and M. L. Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki. 2017. Scale dependence of biotic homogenisation by urbanisation: A comparison of urban bird communities between central Argentina and northern Finland. European Journal of Ecology 3:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1515/eje-2017-0011.

Marone, L. 2019. Sur les types de problèmes rencontrés en science, en technologie et dans les professions: fondements d’une politique scientifique. Métascience 1:105-120. https://doi.org/10.3917/metas.001.0107.

Marone, L. 2024. The role of theory in mitigating the ‘reproducibility crisis’. Ecología Austral 34:134-140. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.24.34.1.0.2291.

Marone, L., and L. Galetto. 2011. El doble papel de las hipótesis en la investigación ecológica y su relación con el método hipotético deductivo. Ecología Austral 21:201-216.

Marone, L., and S. R. Camín. 2022. Seed preferences suggest a high vulnerability of the Yellow Cardinal (Gubernatix cristata) to habitat degradation in Argentina. Emu 3-4: 208-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/01584197.2022.2112696.

Marone, L., V. R. Cueto, J. Lopez de Casenave, A. Zarco, and S. R. Camín. 2022. Plausible causes of seed preferences and diet composition in seed-eating passerines. Journal of Avian Biology 2022:e02875. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.02875.

Marone, L., M. Olmedo, D. Y. Valdés, A. Zarco, J. Lopez de Casenave, and R. G. Pol. 2017. Diet switching of seed-eating birds wintering in grazed habitats of the central Monte Desert, Argentina. Condor 119:673-682. https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-17-61.1.

Oza, A. 2023. Reproducibility goes on trial in ecology. Nature 622:677-678. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03177-1.

Peters, R. H. 1991. A critique for ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 0 521 39588 7.

Peterson, E. L. 2020. What methods do life scientists use? A brief history with philosophical implications. Pp. 168-192 in K. Kampourakis and T. Uller (eds.). Philosophy of Science for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108648981.010.

Popper, K. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. Basic Books, New York. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271626032800174.

Sagario, M. C., V. R. Cueto, A. Zarco, R. G. Pol, and L. Marone. 2020. Predicting how seed-eating passerines respond to cattle grazing in a semi-arid grassland using seed preferences and diet. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 289:e106736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106736.

The roles of natural history during ecological research

Downloads

Published

2025-03-09

Versions

How to Cite

Marone, L., & Jaksic, F. M. (2025). The roles of natural history during ecological research. Ecología Austral, 35(1), 043–052. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.1.0.2482