The gender dimension in ecology: Perspectives from a diversity of approaches

Authors

  • Paula Meli Laboratorio de Estudios del Antropoceno, Universidad de Concepción. Chile. Fundación Internacional para la Restauración de Ecosistemas Argentina. Argentina. Natura y Ecosistemas Mexicanos. A.C., México
  • Florencia Spirito Laboratorio de Agroecología y Sustentabilidad Alimentaria, Universidad de La Frontera. Chile
  • Josefina L. De Paepe CONICET, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Argentina
  • M. Fernanda Reyes Instituto de Tierras, Agua y Medio Ambiente, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, CONICET, CCT Confluencia. Neuquén, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2631

Keywords:

ecofeminism, equity, inequality, intersectoral, Latin America, socioecological systems, women

Abstract

Ecology is science not exempt from gender inequality. Although women now represent nearly one-third of the global research workforce, their academic trajectories remain marked by the ‘leaky pipeline’ and the ‘glass ceiling’ —symptoms of hierarchies sustained by sexist stereotypes—. In response to this reality, spaces of resistance are emerging, inviting us to rethink ecology through a gender perspective. This perspective seeks to expose the social relations that organize, legitimize and perpetuate hierarchies based on sexual differences and sexist stereotypes. It also aims to identify and address the inequalities women face in academia. This involves not only understanding how knowledge is constructed under historical biases —challenging assumptions of objectivity, neutrality, and universality—, but also questioning science’s supposed objectivity and neutrality, all while incorporating historically invisible dimensions (e.g., territoriality and community-based knowledge). In this special issue we present twelve articles by women authors from six Latin American countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Uruguay). These contributions encompass theoretical and political debates, bibliometric reviews, and field-based case studies that document gaps in scientific productivity, academic leadership, and workplace violence, while also highlighting collective experiences, methodological innovations, and biocultural conservation efforts led by women. Together, these studies demonstrate that gender inequality in Latin American ecology is multifactorial, manifesting in laboratories, classrooms, research fields and rural and Indigenous territories. By making these patterns visible and proposing actionable pathways —from collaborative leadership to integrating local knowledge into public policy—, this volume shows that a more equitable ecology is also an epistemologically stronger and socially relevant science.

References

Amon, M. J. 2017. Looking through the glass ceiling: a qualitative study of STEM women's career narratives. Frontiers in Psychology 8:236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00236.

Blázquez Graf, N., and A. C. Chapa Romero. 2018. Inclusión del análisis de género en la ciencia. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Campagnoli, M. A. 2018. Epistemologías críticas feministas. Aproximaciones actuales. Descentrada 2(2):e047.

Chuliver, M., J. Grosso, G. Fontanarrosa, J. Fratani, D. P., Ferraro, et al. 2021. Gender inequities in herpetology: the case of the Argentine community. Cuadernos de Herpetología 35(2):195-205. https://doi.org/10.31017/CdH.2021.

De Tezanos Pinto, P., J. Bodnar, V. P. Carreira, V. Casa, E. P. Coturel, et al. 2025. Empoderando a las mujeres en Ciencia: Una Guía de Buenas Prácticas. Ecología Austral 35(2bis):948-957. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2476.

Ghion, J., E. A. Queiroz, P. Meli, and D. C. Rother. 2025. Gender and ecology: women representation in the Brazilian Ecology Congress. Ecología Austral 35(2bis):838-844. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2602.

Gómez, M. I., K. Naoki, and P. Velásquez-Noriega. 2025. Género y productividad de las publicaciones en ecología en Bolivia: Un análisis de cuatro décadas. Ecología Austral 35(2bis):808-817. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2549.

Holman, L., D. Stuart-Fox, and C. E. Hauser. 2018. The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS Biology 16(4):e2004956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956.

Kruk, C., G. M. Vélez-Rubio, N. Bortolotto, V. Amara, R. Trinchin, et al. 2025. Mujeres en las ciencias del mar y la ecología acuática en Uruguay. Ecología Austral 35(2bis):845-858. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2483.

Lamas, M. 2015. El género. México: Bonilla Artigas Editores.

Lomáscolo, S. B., M. L. Sandoval-Salinas, A. Novillo, G. Fontanarrosa, M. G. Núñez Montellano, et al. 2024. Perspectives – Academic career in ecology: Effect of gender, caregiving labor, and the working environment. Forest Ecology and Management 560:121801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.121801.

Lomáscolo, S. B., A. Novillo, E. J. I. Pero, M. L. Sandoval-Salinas, M. G. Núñez Montellano, et al. 2025. Avanzar sobre suelo resbaladizo: Desafíos que enfrentan las ecólogas relacionados con el trabajo de campo, los viajes y el entorno de trabajo. Ecología Austral 35(2bis):869-878. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2496.

Ludovico, M. F., A. Amador, G. Monti, and S. P. Dawson. 2019. Women in science in Argentina: institutional changes and persistence of stereotypes. AIP Conference Proceedings 2109(1):50002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5110076.

Magnan, A. K., H. O. Pörtner, V. K. Duvat, M. Garschagen, V. A. Guinder, et al. 2021. Estimating the global risk of anthropogenic climate change. Nature Climate Change 11(10):879-885. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01156-w.

McGuire, K. L., R. B. Primack, and E. C. Losos. 2012. Dramatic improvements and persistent challenges for women ecologists. BioScience 62(2):189-196. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.2.12.

Molpeceres, C., V. Cabral, G. Kaczan, and M. González Insúa. 2025. Aportes al análisis de innovaciones y tecnologías en la producción agroecológica del partido de General Pueyrredón desde una perspectiva de género. Ecología Austral 35(2bis):879-895. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2473.

Núñez Montellano, M. G., M. L. Sandoval-Salinas, P. V. Zelaya, S. Lomáscolo, G. Fontanarrosa, et al. 2025. Crónica de una desigualdad: El caso de la Ecología en Argentina. Ecología Austral 35(2bis):818-837. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2505.

O’Brien, K. R., M. Holmgren, T. Fitzsimmons, M. E. Crane, P. Maxwell, and B. Head. 2019. What Is Gender Equality in Science? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 34(5):395-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.02.009.

Parra, M., C. Nogales, N. Paco, M. Bobadilla, A. Oyharzabal Castro, and S. Sharry. 2025. El uso sostenible de la biodiversidad desde la perspectiva de género en tres ecorregiones argentinas: Yungas, Chaco Seco y Bosque Atlántico. Ecología Austral 35(2bis):896-912. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2471.

Reyes, M. F., F. Spirito, M. Lallement, P. Meli, and J. L. De Paepe. 2025. Gender gaps in Argentine science: the unfixable leaky pipeline. Academia Environmental Sciences and Sustainability 3(2):1-7. https://doi.org/10.20935/AcadEnvSci7863.

Rius, L. F. 2000. Roles de género y mujeres académicas. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 88-89:63. URL: tinyurl.com/yh6vrhtc.

Ross, M. B., B. M. Glennon, R. Murciano-Goroff, E. G. Berkes, B. A. Weinberg, and J. I. Lane. 2022. Women are credited less in science than men. Nature 608(7921):135-145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w.

Salerno, P. E., M. Páez-Vacas, J. M. Guayasamin, and J. L. Stynoski. 2019. Male principal investigators (almost) don't publish with women in ecology and zoology. PLoS ONE 14(6):e0218598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218598.

Santoro, F. R., J. L. Almeida Campos, and B. Arias Toledo. 2025. El desafío de la conciliación: ser madre y el desarrollo de una carrera científica en Argentina y Brasil. Ecología Austral 35(2bis):859-868. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2472.

Shen, H. 2013. Inequality quantified: mind the gender gap. Nature News 495(7439):22-24. https://doi.org/10.1038/495022a.

Spirito, F., P. Meli, M. F. Reyes, G. Núñez-Vivanco, Z. Beloff, and J. L. De Paepe. 2023. Gender stereotypes in ecological research themes: An analysis of the last 20 years of the Argentinian ecology conferences. Austral Ecology 49:e13301. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.13301.

Tauro, A., and L. Linsalata. 2025. Ciencia ecológica y feminismos ecoterritoriales: un diálogo a partir de la noción de cuerpo-territorio. Ecología Austral, Vol. 35(bis):939-947. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2479.

van der Linden, N., G. Roberge, and D. Malkov. 2024. Gender Equality in Research and Innovation - 2024 Review, Elsevier Data Repository, V2. https://doi.org/10.17632/bb5jb7t2zv.2.

Vilá, B. 2025. Mujeres, ciencias ambientales y ecofeminismo: Lo personal es político (y también científico). Ecología Austral 35(2bis):913-925. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2452.

Vilardo, G., P. Fergnani, M. L. Suárez, C. A. Huaylla, D. L. Moreno Azocar, and S. Ruiz-Suarez. 2025. Valores compartidos en la comunidad R-Ladies: hacia la construcción de un liderazgo alternativo al modelo patriarcal. Ecología Austral 35(2bis):926-938. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2474.

Whittington, A., and T. A. Pelletier. 2021. Women in field science: Challenges, strategies, and support systems for success. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 27(6):59-83. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2021035731.

The gender dimension in ecology: Perspectives from a diversity of approaches.

Published

2025-11-28

How to Cite

Meli, P., Spirito, F., De Paepe, J. L., & Reyes, M. F. (2025). The gender dimension in ecology: Perspectives from a diversity of approaches. Ecología Austral, 35(2-bis), 800–807. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.25.35.2.1.2631