Conservation of ecosystem services in high-altitude Andean wetlands: social participation in the creation of a natural protected area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.17.27.1.1.271Abstract
The goal of the present work is to synthesize the process of collective construction developed to protect the high-altitude wetlands of the Blanco River basin, located in the Andes Mountains, Province of Mendoza. The participatory process arose out of an initiative of basin residents and users, and was conducted by the Integrative Committee for Creation of Potrerillos Municipal Environmental Protected Area (MEPA), composed of civil society organizations, government agencies and scientific institutions. The major pressures affecting the wetlands, identified through participatory assessment of the socio-ecosystem are: water pollution, reduction and total loss of habitat, stoppage of groundwater flows, artificial drainage, poldering of the meadow, and fragmentation of the wetland system, among other pressures. In order to identify priority sites for conservation of the ecosystem services (ES) wetlands provide, local people identified and prioritized the six most important of them, according to their perception: water for human consumption, agriculture and industry, aesthetic, spiritual and non-use representations, recreation and ecotourism, erosion control, water regulation and regulation of the biotic environment. The areas supplying ES were identified on the map of land use and land cover of the basin, with the wetland area, with tourist use and water catchment, and the watershed’s headwaters standing out as areas with higher ES provision. This process culminated in the creation of a protected area to halt the intense degradation affecting the wetland system, promoting maintenance of the natural area and improving its provision of ES. This collective process allowed integrating local and scientific knowledge, becoming an experience to be replicated in other areas in terms of conservation and land management. Among its major strengths is a strong coordination between the different social actors involved, which allowed success in reaching the implementation stage of a public policy for conservation.
https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.17.27.1.1.271
References
Abraham, E., and M. Salomón. 2011. Experiencias de combate a la desertificación en Mendoza. En: Desertificação e mudanças climáticas no semiárido brasileiro. Ricardo da Cunha Correia Lima, Arnóbio de Mendonça Barreto Cavalcante, Aldrin Martin Perez-Marin (Editores). Campina Grande, Instituto Nacional do Semiárido Campina Grande, PB. Brasil, INSA-PB, D451. Módulo 10:183-206. ISBN 978-85-64265-02-8.
Abraham, E., D. Soria, C. Rubio, M. C. Rubio, and J. Virgillito. 2014. Modelo Territorial Actual, Mendoza, Argentina. Subsistema Físico-Biológico o Natural de la Provincia de Mendoza. Proyecto. Ordenamiento Territorial para un Desarrollo Sustentable, PID-2009-00008. Foncyt, UNCuyo and CONICET. URL: www.mendoza-conicet.gob.ar/otm.
Berkes, F., and C. Folke. 1998. Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Bruniard, E. 1982. La diagonal árida argentina. Un límite climático real. Revista Geográfica. IPGH 95:5-20. Mexico.
Burkart, R., N. Bárbaro, R. Sánchez, and D. Gómez. 1999. Ecorregiones de la Argentina. Administración de Parques Nacionales. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
CBD/Pnuma. 1999. Development ob Biological Diversity - Study Note of the General Secretary, Fifth Meeting of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice, Montreal, Canada, 31 January-4 February 2000. Doc. UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/5/12, 22 October 1999.
Chevalier, J., and D. Bucles. 2009. Guía para la Investigación Colaborativa y la Movilización Social. SAS2 (Social Analisys System) Ottawa. Canadá.
Costanza, R., R. d'Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260.
Costanza, R., and S. Farber. 2002. Introduction to the special issue on the dynamics and value of ecosystem services: integrating economic and ecological perspectives. Ecological Economics 41:367-373.
Daily, E., S. Polasky, J. Goldstein, et al. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Ecol Environ 7(1):21-28.
DEIE (Dirección de Estadísticas e Investigaciones Económicas). 2001. Censo Nacional e Población. Ministerio de Producción, Tecnología e Innovación. Gobierno de Mendoza. Available in: www.deie.mendoza.gov.ar.
DEIE (Dirección de Estadísticas e Investigaciones Económicas). 2010. Censo Nacional e Población. Ministerio de Producción, Tecnología e Innovación. Gobierno de Mendoza. Available in: www.deie.mendoza.gov.ar.
De Groot, R., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7:260-272.
DGI (Departamento General de Irrigación). 2006. Estudio de caracterización del sistema hídrico superficial de la provincia de Mendoza. Componente Calidad de Agua y Suelos Programa de Riego y Drenaje de la Provincia de Mendoza.
Dudley, N. (ed.). 2008. Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. IUCN, Gland.
Fisher, B., K. Turner, and P. Morling. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68(3):643-653.
Foley, J., R. DeFries, G. Asner, C. Barford, G. Bonan, et al. 2005. Global Consequences of Land Use. Science 309:570-579. Doi: 10.1126/science.1111772.
Folke, C. 1998. Ecosystem approaches to the management and allocation of critical resources. Pp. 313-345. In: M. L. Pace and P. M. Groffman (eds.). Successes, limitations and frontiers in ecosystem science. Springer-Verlag, New York. Pp. 499.
Gudiño, M. 2006. Impacto de la obra Presa Potrerillos en los habitantes de la villa y su entorno inmediato. Revista Proyección año 2, vol. 1, número 2. Mendoza, Argentina. ISSN 1852-0006.
Haines-Young, R., and M. Potschin. 2011. Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES): 2011 Update. Contract No. EEA/BSS/07/007, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007: synthesis report. In: Core Writing TeamPachauri RK, Reisinger A, editors. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC. Pp. 104.
IUCN. 1994. Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories. IUCN, Cambridge, UK and Gland, Suiza. Pp. 261.
Kusler, J., M. Brinson, W. Niering, J. Patterson, V. Burkett, and D. Willard. 1999. Wetlands and climate change: scientific knowledge and management options. White Paper Institute for Wetland Science and Public Policy. Association of Wetland Managers/Wetland International, Berne.
Jóbbagy, E., M. Nosetto, P. Villagra, and R. Jackson. 2011. Water subsidies from mountains to deserts: Their role in sustaining groundwater-fed oases in a sandy landscape. Ecological Applications 21:678-694.
Lambin, E., B. Turner, H. Geist, S. Agbola, and A. Angelsen. 2001. The causes of land‐use and land‐cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Change 11(4):261-69.
Laterra, P., E. Jobbágy, and J. Paruelo (eds.). 2010. El Valor Ecológico, Social y Económico de los Servicios Ecosistémicos. Conceptos, Herramientas y Estudio de Casos. Ediciones INTA. ISBN: 978-987-679-018-5.
Martín-López, B., M. García-Llorente, E. Gómez-Baggethun, and C. Montes. 2010. Evaluación de los servicios de los ecosistemas del sistema socio-ecológico de Doñana. Forum de Sostenibilidad 4:77-96.
Martín-López, B., and C. Montes. 2011. Biodiversidad y servicios de los ecosistemas. Observatorio de la Sostenibilidad en España (OSE). Pp. 444-465.
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Policy responses. Washington, DC, USA. Island Press. Pp. 621.
Meffe, G., and C. Carroll. 1997. Principles of Conservation Biology. 2° Ed. Massachusetts, US, Sinauer. Pp. 729.
Mezger, M., M. Rounsevell, L. Acosta-Michlik, R. Leemans, and D. Schroter. 2006. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114:69-85.
Nahuelhual, L., A. Carmona, P. Lozada, A. Jaramillo, and M. Aguayo. 2013. Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural Ecosystem service: An application at the local level in Southern Chile. Applied Geography 40:71-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.004.
Nosetto, M., E. Jobbágy, and J. Paruelo. 2005. Land use change and water 750 losses: the case of grassland afforestation across a soil textural gradient in Central 751 Argentina. Global Change Biology 11:1101-1117.
Ostrom, E. 2009. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science 325(5939):419-422.
Paruelo J., J. Guerschman, G. Piñeiro, E. Jobbágy, S. Verón, G. Baldi, and S. Baeza. 2006. Cambios en el uso de la tierra en Argentina y Uruguay: marcos conceptuales para su análisis. Agrociencias X:47‐61.
RAMSAR Convention. 2002a. Resolution No. VIII.3 de la COP 8. Climate Change and Wetlands: Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation. Valencia, España.
RAMSAR Convention. 2002b. Resolution No. VIII.35 of COP 8. Repercussion of natural disasters, particularly drought, in wetland ecosystems. Valencia, España.
RAMSAR Convention. 2002c. Resolution No.VIII.11 of COP 8. Additional orientation to identify and determine types of wetlands insufficiently represented as Wetlands of International Importance. Valencia, España.
RAMSAR Convention. 2005. Resolution No. IX.1 of COP 9. Annex A. A conceptual framework for rational use of wetlands and maintenance of their ecological features. Kampala, Uganda.
RAMSAR Convention. 2015a. Resolution No. XI.14 of COP 12. Wetlands and their functions for mitigation of climate change. Punta del Este, Uruguay.
RAMSAR Convention. 2015b. Resolution No. XII.11 of COP 12. Peatbogs, climate change and rational use; implications for Ramsar Convention. Punta del Este, Uruguay.
Reed, M., and L. Stringer. 2015. Impulse Report for the 3rd UNCCD Scientific Conference United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. Birmingham City University and University of Leeds, Cancún, Mexico.
Roig, F., M. González Loyarte, E. Abraham, E. Méndez, V. Roig, and E. Martínez Carretero. 1991. Maps of desertification Hazards of Central Western Argentina, Mendoza Province. Study case. In: UNEP (ed.) "World Atlas of thematic Indicators of Desertification”, E. Arnold, London.
Rowe, G., and J. Frewer. 2000. Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science Technology Human Values 25(1)3-29. DOI: 10.1177/016224390002500101.
Rowe, G., and J. Frewer. 2004. Evaluating public-participation exercises: a research agenda. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 29(4):512-556. DOI: 10.1177/0162243903259197.
Rubio, C. 2012. Unpublished. Inventario y propuesta de conservación de los humedales de la cuenca del río Blanco. Luján de Cuyo, Mendoza. Licentiate thesis, National University of Cuyo. Mendoza, Argentina.
Rubio, C., S. Fermani, and V. Parera. 2014. Evolución de la conservación en la provincia de Mendoza. Desafíos en el proceso de ordenamiento territorial en tierras secas. Zonas Áridas. Lima. Vol. 15:195-210.
Salomón, M. 2010. Modelo de gestión para la administración hídrica descentralizada y participativa, su aplicación a través de las organizaciones de usuarios. Asociación de Inspecciones de Cauces 1º Zona Río Mendoza I Seminario Uso Racional del Agua en Proyectos de Irrigación. USRA. Neiva. Colombia. Pp. 10.
UNEP. 1997. World Atlas of Desertification. 2nd. ed. Oxford University Press. Pp. 182.
Villalba, R., and J. Boninsegna. 2009. Implicancias del cambio climático en la Provincia de Mendoza (ANEXO), Informe Ambiental 2009, Government of Mendoza. Pp. 203. Available in: https://es.scribd.com/document/323170636/Informe-Ambiental-2009.
Young, O., E. Lambin, F. Alcock, et al. 2006. A Portfolio approach to analyzing complex human-environment interactions: institutions and land change. Ecol Soc 11:31.
Zorrilla-Miras, P., I. Palomo, E. Gómez-Baggethun, B. Martín-López, P. Lomas, and C. Montes. 2014. Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: a case study in the Doñana marshes (SW Spain). Landscape and Urban Planning 22:160:174.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 María Clara Rubio, Cecilia Rubio, Mario A. Salomón, Elena Abraham
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.
