Patrones de invasión de los pastizales de Uruguay a escala regional

Authors

  • Daniella Bresciano Facultad de Agronomía. Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Claudia Rodríguez
  • Felipe Lezama
  • Alice Altesor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.14.24.1.0.40

Abstract

Ecología Austral, 24:83-93 (2014)

Studies on the relationship between the richness of native and exotic plants have generated conflicting evidence depending, among others, on the spatial scale of analysis. This study assessed the invasion by exotic species in natural grasslands of Uruguay at a regional scale. We analyzed 313 vegetation census from four geomorphological regions: Cuesta Basaltica, Cuenca Sedimentaria, Centro Sur and Sierras del Este. The results showed that the relationship between native and exotic richness was negative for Centro Sur while the effect of native species richness on exotic plant cover was negative for Centro Sur and Cuenca Sedimentaria. In most analyses, the functional type C4 grasses was negatively associated with the exotic richness and cover, and strongly inhibits Cynodon dactylon, the only C4 exotic grass species present in the sites. Conversely, C3 species showed irregular patterns of association with the exotics. Also, exotic richness was positively related with the percentage of agricultural use and vegetation cover. Our results suggest that propagule pressure and productivity favour the introduction and establishment of exotic species, but they are largely controlled by the composition of the resident community, in particular by the presence of C4 perennial grasses, which are the group with the highest cover in these communities. This could explain the very low incidence of exotic species in Uruguayan grasslands.

References

ALTESOR, A; G PIÑEIRO; F LEZAMA; RB JACKSON; M SARASOLA; ET AL. 2006. Ecosystem changes associated with grazing in subhumid South American grasslands. J. Veg. Sci., 17:323-332.

BAEZA, S; F GALLEGO; F LEZAMA; A ALTESOR & JM PARUELO. 2011. Cartografía de los pastizales naturales en las regiones geomorfológicas de Uruguay predominantemente ganaderas. Pp. 33-54 en: Altesor, A; W Ayala; JM Paruelo, JM (eds.). Bases ecológicas y tecnológicas para el manejo de pastizales. Serie FPTA INIA 26, Uruguay.

BLUM, A; I NARBONDO; G OYHANTCABAL & D SANCHO. 2008. Soja transgénica y sus impactos en Uruguay. La nueva colonización. Ed. M.I. Cárcamo. RAPAL - Uruguay.

BRAUN BLANQUET, J. 1950. Sociología vegetal. ACME. Buenos Aires.

CATFORD, J; R JANSSON & C NILSSON. 2009. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Diversity Distrib., 15:22-40.

CHANETON, EJ; SB PERELMAN; M OMACINI & RJC LEÓN. 2002. Grazing, environmental heterogeneity, and alien plant invasions in temperate Pampa grasslands. Biol. Invasions, 4:7-24.

CRAWLEY, MJ; SL BROWN; MS HEARD & GR EDWARDS. 1999. Invasion-resistance in experimental grassland communities: species richness or species identity? Ecol. Lett., 2:140-148.

DALEO, P; J ALBERTI & O IRIBARNE. 2009. Biological invasions and the neutral theory. Diversity Distrib., 15:547-553.

D’ANTONIO, C; J LEVINE & M THOMSEN. 2001. Ecosystem resistance to invasion and the role of propagule supply: a California perspective. J. Med. Ecol., 2:233-245.

DAVIES, KF; P CHESSON; S HARRISON; BD INOUYE; BA MELOBOURNE; ET AL. 2005. Spatial heterogeneity explains the scale dependence of the native-exotic diversity relationship. Ecology, 86:1602-1610.

DAVIS, MA; JP GRIME & K THOMPSON. 2000. Fluctuation resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol., 88:528-534.

ELTON, CS. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London, UK.

EMERY, SM. 2007. Limiting similarity between invaders and dominant species in herbaceous plant communities? J. Ecol., 95:1027-1035.

FARGIONE, J & D TILMAN. 2005. Diversity decreases invasion via both sampling and complementarity effects. Ecol. Lett., 8:604-611.

FARGIONE, J; CS BROWN & D TILMAN. 2003. Community assembly and invasion: an experimental test of neutral versus niche processes. PNAS, 100:8916-8920.

FONSECA, CR; DL GUADAGNIN; C EMER; S MASCIANDRI; P GERMAIN; ET AL. 2013. Invasive alien plants in the Pampas grasslands; a tri-national cooperation challange. Biol. Invas., doi: 10.1007/s10530-013-0406-2.

FRIDLEY, JD. 2013. Generalized linear models in R. http://plantecology.syr.edu/fridley/bio793/glm.html. Acceso: 5 de agosto de 2013.

FRIDLEY, JD; JJ STACHOWICZ; S NAEEM; DF SAX; W SEABLOOM; ET AL. 2007. The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology, 88:3-17.

HARETCHE, F & C RODRÍGUEZ. 2004. Banco de semillas de un pastizal uruguayo bajo diferentes condiciones de pastoreo. Ecología Austral, 16:105-113.

HIERRO, JL; JL MARON & RM CALLAWAY 2005. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J. Ecol., 93:5-15.

HUBBELL, ST. 2005. Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Funct. Ecol., 19:166-172.

HUBBELL SP. 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

HUSTON, M. 2004. Management strategies for plant invasions: manipulating productivity, disturbance, and competition, Diversity Distrib., 10:167-178

HUSTON, MA. 1979. A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am. Nat., 113:81-101.

LEONI, E; A ALTESOR & JM PARUELO. 2009. Explaining patterns of production from individual level traits. J. Veg. Sci., 20:612-619.

LEVINE, JM; PB ADLER & SG YELENIK. 2004. A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol. Lett., 7:975-989.

LEZAMA, F; S BAEZA; A ALTESOR; A CESA; EJ CHANETON; ET AL. 2013. Variation of grazing-induced vegetation changes across a large-scale productivity gradient. J. Veg. Sci., Doi:10.1111/jvs.12053.

LEZAMA, F; A ALTESOR; M PEREIRA & JM PARUELO. 2011. Descripción de la heterogeneidad florística de las principales regiones geomorfológicas de Uruguay. Pp.15-32 en: Altesor, A; W Ayala & JM Paruelo (eds.). Bases ecológicas y tecnológicas para el manejo de pastizales. Serie FPTA - INIA 26. Uruguay.

LEZAMA, F; A ALTESOR; RJ LEÓN & JM PARUELO. 2006. Heterogeneidad de la vegetación en pastizales naturales de la región basáltica de Uruguay. Ecología Austral, 16:167-182.

LONSDALE, WP. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology, 8:1522-1536.

MACK, RN; D SIMBERLOFF; WM LONSDALE; H EVANS; M CLOUT; ET AL. 2000. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl., 10:689-710.

MATTEUCCI, S & A COLMA. 1982. Metodología para el estudio de la vegetación. Monografía OEA, Washington, DC. Pp. 53-54.

MEDEIROS, RB & T FOCHT. 2007. Invasão, prevenção, controle e utilização do capim-annoni

(Eragrostis plana Nees) no Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Revista Agropecuária Gaúcha, 13:105-114.

MGAP, DIEA. 2001. Censo General Agropecuario. 2000. http://www.mgap.gub.uy/Dieaanterior/CENSOVOL2/indice.htm.

MILLOT, JC; D RISSO & R METHOL. 1987. Relevamiento de pasturas naturales y mejoramientos extensivos en áreas ganaderas del Uruguay. Informe Técnico, Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca. Montevideo. Uruguay.

MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D& H ELLENBERG. 1974. Aim and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley, Nueva York.

PANARIO, D. 1988. Geomorfología del Uruguay. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias, Universidad de la República. Montevideo, Uruguay.

PARUELO, JM; JP GUERSCHMAN; G PIÑEIRO; EG JOBBÁGY; SR VERÓN; ET AL. 2006. Cambios en el uso de la tierra en Argentina y Uruguay: marcos conceptuales para su análisis. Agrociencia, 10:47-61.

PERELMAN, SB; WB BATISTA; E CHANETON & RJC LEÓN. 2007. Habitat stress, species pool size, and biotic resistance influence exotic plant richness in the Flooding Pampa grasslands. J. Ecol., 95:662-673.

PETERMANN, JS; AJF FERGUS; C ROSCHER; LA TURNBULL; A WEIGELT; ET AL. 2010. Biology, chance, or history? The predictible reassembly of temperate grassland communities. Ecology, 91:408-421.

RODRÍGUEZ, C; E LEONI; F LEZAMA & A ALTESOR. 2003. Temporal trends in species composition and plant traits in natural grasslands of Uruguay. J. Veg. Sci., 14:433-440.

ROSENGURTT, B. 1979 Tablas de comportamiento de las especies de plantas de campos naturales en el Uruguay. Publicación de la Facultad de Agronomía. Montevideo, Uruguay.

SAGE, RF; M LI & RK MONSON. 1999. The taxonomic distribution of C4 photosynthesis. Pp. 551-581 en: Sage, RF & RK Monson (eds.). C4 plant biology. Academic Press.

SEABLOOM, E; ET BORER; Y BUCKLEY; WE CLELAND; K DAVIES; ET AL. 2013. Predicting invasion in grassland ecosystems: is exotic dominance the real embarrassment

of richness? Glob. Change Biol., doi: 10.1111/gcb.12370.

SHEA, K & P CHESSON. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol., 17:170-176.

SMITH, MD & AK KNAPP. 1999. Exotic plant species in a C4-dominated grassland: invasibility, disturbance, and community structure. Oecologia, 120:605-612.

SORIANO, A. 1992. Río de la Plata grasslands. Pp. 367-407 en: Coupland, RT (ed.). Natural grasslands. Introduction and western hemisphere. Elsevier.

SOUZA, L; WA BUNN; D SIMBERLOFF; RM LAWTON & NJ SANDERS. 2011. Biotic and abiotic influences on native and exotic richness relationship across spatial scales: favourable environments for native species are higly invasible. Funct. Ecol., 25:1106-1112.

VITOUSEK, PM; CM D'ANTONIO; LL LOOPE & R WESTBROOKS. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am. Sci., 84:468-478.

WHITAKKER, RH. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21:213-251.

Published

2014-04-01

How to Cite

Bresciano, D., Rodríguez, C., Lezama, F., & Altesor, A. (2014). Patrones de invasión de los pastizales de Uruguay a escala regional. Ecología Austral, 24(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.14.24.1.0.40