Quality assessment and restoration perspectives of riparian forest in an Andean river from Patagonia, Argentina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.20.30.1.0.928Abstract
The river banks are one of the most important aspects to quantifying and qualifying the ecological status of aquatic ecosystems. An evaluation of the quality of the riparian forests and the restoration perspectives of the Carrileufu river, from its sources in Cholila lake to its mouth in Rivadavia lake, NW of Chubut was raised. Two stretches of the tributary Pedregoso river were also included. A physical and ecological characterization was carried out at the ecosystem level and at the stretch level, registering environmental variables, plant community attributes and the active and inactive geomorphological processes in the river environment. The QBRp index was applied in twelve stretches of 100 m in length, subject to one or more land uses (i.e., exotic plantations, urbanization, agriculture, livestock, recreational-tourist activity). A multicriteria analysis was applied, with the information relieved as input, which allowed defining the feasibility of restoration and the most appropriate management for each stretch of the river. The values of the QBRp index varied between intermediate to very good river bank quality, without bad or bad quality; observing an inverse relationship between the riparian forest quality and the overlap and intensity of land uses. Regarding to restoration prospects, three stretches presented a feasibility defined as ´simple´, four of them ´moderate and five showed a ´difficult´ one. Different management ways for their recovery were established, ranging from conservation/regeneration, restoration, complex restoration/revegetation, and even rehabilitation of the more degraded stretches.
https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.20.30.1.0.928
References
Allan, J. D. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:257-84. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122.
Boudell, J. A., M. D. Dixon, S. B. Rood, and J. C. Stromberg. 2015. Restoring functional riparian ecosystems: concepts and applications. Ecohydrology 8(5):747-752. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1664.
Brice, J. C. 1964. Channel patterns and terraces of the Loup Rivers. US Geological Survey Professional Paper, Nebraska, 422-D. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp422D.
Calderón, M. 2007. Hidrología. Plan Estratégico de Manejo Conjunto de las áreas este y norte linderas con el Parque Nacional Los Alerces, Chubut - Argentina. Informe Final-CFI.
Ceccon, E. 2003. Los bosques ribereños y la restauración y conservación de las cuencas hidrográficas. Ciencias 72:46-53.
Cisneros, J., C. Cholaky, A. Cantero Gutiérrez, J. González, M. Reynero, A. Diez, and L. Bergesio. 2012. Erosión hídrica. Principios y técnicas de manejo. Ed. UniRío, Córdoba. Pp. 290.
Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura (CHS). 2008. Restauración de riberas. Manual para la restauración de Riberas en la cuenca del Río Segura. Ed. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y medio Rural y Marino. Pp. 230.
Correa, M. O. (dir.). 1978-1999. Flora Patagónica. Tomo VIII: parte I, II, III, IVa, IVb, V, y VIII. Colección científica del INTA, Buenos Aires.
DeFries, R. S., J. A. Foley, and G. P. Asner. 2004. Land‐use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Front Ecol Environ 2:249-257. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0249:LCBHNA]2.0.CO;2.
Dudgeon, D., A. H. Arthington, M. O. Gessner, Z. Kawabata, D. J. Knowler, C. Lévêque, R. J. Naiman, A. Prieur-Richard, D. Soto. M. L. J. Stiassny, and C. A. Sullivan. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81:163-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006950.
Elosegi, A., and J. Díez. 2009. La vegetación terrestre asociada al río: el bosque de ribera. Pp. 311-321 en A. Elosegi and S. Sabater (eds.). Conceptos y técnicas en ecología fluvial. Fundación BBVA, España.
Ezcurra, C., and C. A. M. Brion. 2005. Plantas del Nahuel Huapi. Catálogo de la Flora Vascular del Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi, Argentina. Ed. Bavaria, San Carlos de Bariloche. Pp. 1-70.
Fernández, R. D., S. J. Ceballos, A. L. González Achem, M. V. Hidalgo, and H. R. Fernández. 2016. Quality and Conservation of Riparian Forest in a Mountain Subtropical Basin of Argentina. International Journal of Ecology. Artículo ID 4842165. Pp. 10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4842165.
Gantes, P., L. Falco, and A. Sánchez Caro. 2014. Efecto del ganado sobre la estructura de la vegetación en las riberas de un arroyo pampeano. Biología Acuática 30:123-131.
García Quiroga, F., and J. Abad Soria. 2014. Los corredores ecológicos y su importancia ambiental: Propuestas de actuación para fomentar la permeabilidad y conectividad aplicadas al entorno del río Cardeña (Ávila y Segovia). Observatorio Medioambiental 17:253-298. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_OBMD.2014.v17.47194.
González del Tánago, M., D. García de Jalón, and M. Román. 2012. River restoration in Spain: Theoretical and practical approach in the context of the European Water Framework Directive. Environ Manage 50(1):123-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9862-1.
Gordon, N. D., T. A. McMahon, B. L. Finlayson, C. J. Gippel, and R. J. Nathan. 2004. Stream hydrology. An introduction for ecologists. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Sussex, England, 2nd edition. Pp. 429.
Gregory, S. V., F. J. Swanson, W. A. McKee, and K. W. Cummins. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 41:540-551. https://doi.org/10.2307/1311607.
Harding, J. S. 2003. Historic deforestation and the fate of endemic invertebrate species in streams. New Zeal J Mar Fresh 37:333-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2003.9517171.
HIDRI (Agència Catalana de l’Aigua). 2006. Protocolo para la valoración de la calidad hidromorfológica de los ríos. España.
Hill, M. O., and A. J. E. Smith. 1976. Principal component analysis of taxonomic data with multi-state discrete characters. Taxon 25:249-255. https://doi.org/10.2307/1219449.
Kauffman, J. B., R. L. Beschta, N. Otting, and D. Lytjen. 1997. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22(5):12-24. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1997)022%3C0012:AEPORA%3E2.0.CO;2.
Kutschker, A.; C. Brand, M. L. Miserendino. 2009. Evaluación de la calidad de los bosques de ribera en ríos del NO del Chubut sometidos a distintos usos de la tierra. Ecología Austral 19:19-34.
MacFarlane, W. W., J. T. Gilbert, J. D. Gilbert, W. C. Saunders, N. Hough-Snee, C. Hafen, J. M. Wheaton, and S. N. Bennett. 2018. What are the conditions of riparian ecosystems? Identifying impaired floodplain ecosystems across the western U.S. using the Riparian Condition Assessment (RCA) tool. Environ Manage 62:548-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1061-2.
Mander, O., Y. Hayakawa, and V. Kuusemets. 2005. Purification processes, ecological functions, planning and design of riparian buffer in agricultural watersheds. Ecol Eng 24:421-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.01.015.
Martínez, O. A. 2007. Geología y Geomorfología. Plan Estratégico de Manejo Conjunto de las áreas este y norte linderas con el Parque Nacional Los Alerces, Chubut - Argentina. Informe Final CFI.
Maurín, J. D. 2014. Propuesta para la determinación de la Línea de Ribera en San Juan. Fiscalía de Estado de la Provincia de San Juan. Pp. 243-260.
Meli, P., M. Martínez-Ramos, and J. M. Rey-Benayas. 2013. Selecting species for passive and active riparian restoration in Southern Mexico. Restor Ecol 21(2):163-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00934.x.
Miserendino, M. L., C. Brand, and C. Y. Di Prinzio. 2008. Assessing Urban Impacts on Water Quality, Benthic Communities and Fish in Streams of the Andes Mountains, Patagonia (Argentina). Water Air Soil Poll 194(1):91-110.
Miserendino, M. L., R. Casaux, M. Archangelsky, C. Y. Di Prinzio, C. Brand, and A. M. Kutschker. 2011. Assessing land-use effects on water quality, in-stream habitat, riparian ecosystems and biodiversity in Patagonian Northwest streams. Sci Total Environ 409:572-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9701-4.
Munné, A., C. Solá, and N. Prat. 1998. QBR: Un índice rápido para la evaluación de la calidad de los ecosistemas de ribera. Tecnología del Agua 175:20-37.
Munné, A., N. Prat, C. Solá, N. Bonada, and M. R. Rieradevall. 2003. A simple field method for assessing the ecological quality of riparian habitat in rivers and streams: QBR index. Aquat Conserv 13:147-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.529.
Naiman, R. J., and H. Décamps. 1997. The ecology of interfaces : Riparian Zones. Annu Rev Ecol S 28:621-658. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621.
Naiman, R. J., K. L. Fetherston, S. McKay, and J. Chen. 1998. Riparian forests. Pp. 289-323 in R. J. Naiman and R. E. Bilby. River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion. New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1652-0_12.
Papazian, G. 2009. Evaluación de la calidad de los bosques de ribera en el río Percy, Chubut (Argentina). Tesis de Grado, FCN-UNPSJB. Esquel, Chubut. Pp. 61.
Quinn, J. M., L. K. Boothroyd, and B. J. Smith. 2004. Riparian buffers mitigate effects of pine plantation logging on New Zealand streams: 2. Invertebrate communities. Forest Ecol Manag 191(1-3):129-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.11.013.
Rood, S. B., S. G. Bigelow, M. L. Polzin, K. M. Gill, and C. A. Coburn. 2014. Biological bank protection: trees are more effective than grasses at resisting erosion from major river floods. 8(5):772-779. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1544.
Sabater, S., J. C. Donato, A. Giorgi, and A. Elosegi. 2009. El río como ecosistema. Pp. 23-37 en A. Elosegi and S. Sabater (eds.). Conceptos y técnicas en ecología fluvial. Fundación BBVA, España.
Scott, L. N., A. M. Villamagna, and P. L. Angermeier. 2018 A new modeling approach to prioritize riparian restoration to reduce sediment loading in two Virginia river basins. Environ Manage 62(4):721-739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1078-6.
Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) International, Grupo de trabajo sobre ciencia y políticas. 2004. Principios de SER International sobre la restauración ecológica. URL: www.ser.org.
Sirombra, M. G., and L. M. Mesa. 2012. A method for assessing the ecological quality ofriparian forests in subtropical Andean streams: QBRy index. Ecol Indic 20:324-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.021.
Stella, J. C., P. M. Rodríguez-González, S. Dufour, and J. Bendix. 2013. Riparian vegetation research in Mediterranean climate regions: common patterns, ecological processes, and considerations for management. Hydrobiologia 719(1):291-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1304-9.
Stromberg, J. C. 2001. Restoration of riparian vegetation in the South-Western United States: importance of flow regimes and fluvial dynamism. J Arid Environ 49(1):17-34. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.2001.0833.
Subsecretaría de Recursos Hídricos (SSRH). 2002. Altas Digital de los Recursos Hídricos Superficiales de la República Argentina. URL: www.hidricosargentina.gov.ar/cartografia chubut.pdf.
Swanson, S., D. Kozlowski, R. Hall, D. Heggem, and J. Lin. 2017. Riparian proper functioning condition assessment to improve watershed management for water quality. J Soil Water Conserv 72(2):168-182. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.72.2.168.
Valero, E., J. Picos, and X. Álvarez. Characterization of riparian forest quality of the Umia River for a proposed restoration. Ecol Eng 67:216-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.084.
Vizcaíno, P., F. Magdaleno, A. Seves, S. Merino, M. González del Tánago, and D. García de Jalón. 2003. Los cambios geomorfológicos del río Jarama como base para su restauración. Limnetica 22(3-4):1-8.
Ward, J. V. 1989. The four dimensional mature of lotic ecosystems. J North Am Benth Soc 8(1):2-8. https://doi.org/10.2307/1467397.
Zuloaga, F., O. Morrone, and M. Belgrano (eds.). 2008. Catálogo de las plantas vasculares del Cono Sur. Ann Miss Bot Gard 107:1-3486. URL: www.darwin.edu.ar/Proyectos/FloraArgentina.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Adriana M. Kutschker, Gabriela Papazian, Oscar A. Martínez, Nancy Ibañez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.
