The niche concept in metacommunities

Authors

  • Mathew A. Leibold Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
  • Pamela Geddes Department of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Keywords:

neutral theory, resource competition, food webs, community assembly, invasibility, dispersal

Abstract

The science of ecology studies how biological systems interact with their environment. The niche concept lies at the heart of this study because it describes how organisms at different levels of organization interact with their environment at different spatio-temporal scales. However, because different definitions and different perspectives about this concept have existed, confusion has emerged. In this paper we review how such perspectives might be synthesized and we consider how niche relations influence species interactions in metacommunities. We contrast some of the resulting insights with previous work focused on local communities and we use this synthesis to discuss the possible importance of drift mechanisms that exist in the absence of niche differences among species.<

References

AMARASEKARE, P & RM NISBET. 2001. Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics, and the local coexistence of competing species. American Naturalist 158:572-584.

CHASE, JM; P AMARASEKEARE; K COTTENIE; A GONZÁLEZ; R HOLT ET AL. 2005. Competing theories for competitive metacommunities. In: M Holyoak; MA Leibold & RD Holt (eds.). Metacommunity Ecology: Emerging views of community structure and dynamics above the local scale. University of Chicago Press.

CHASE, JM & MA LEIBOLD. 2003. Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches. University of Chicago Press.

ELTON, C. 1927. Animal Ecology. Sidgwick and Jackson. London, England.

GRINNELL, J. 1917. The niche-relationships of the California thrasher. Auk 34:427-433.

GROVER, JP. 1994. Assembly rules for communities for nutrient limited plants and specialist herbivores. American Naturalist 143:258 282.

HASTINGS, A. 1980. Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theoretical Population Biology 18:363-373.

HOLT, RD. 1977. Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theoretical Population Biology 12:237-266.

HOLT, RD; JP GROVER & D TILMAN. 1994. Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. American Naturalist 144:741-771.

HUBBELL, SP. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

HUTCHINSON, GE. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Springs Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22:415427.

LEIBOLD, MA. 1995. The niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community context. Ecology 76:1371-1382.

LEIBOLD, MA. 1996. A graphical model of keystone predators in food webs: trophic regulation of abundance, incidence and diversity patterns in communities. American Naturalist 147:784812.

LEIBOLD, MA. 1998. Similarity and local coexistence of species from regional biotas. Evolutionary Ecology 12:95-110.

LEIBOLD, MA; M HOLYOAK & RD HOLT. 2005. Adaptive and co-adaptive dynamics in metacommunities. In: M Holyoak; MA Leibold & RD Holt (eds.). Metacommunity Ecology: Emerging views of community structure and dynamics above the local scale. University of Chicago Press.

LEIBOLD, MA; M HOLYOAK; N MOUQUET; P AMARASEKARE; JM CHASE ET AL. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for large scale community ecology? Ecology Letters 7:601- 613.

LEIBOLD, MA & MA MCPEEK. En prensa. Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. Ecology.

LEVINS, R & D CULVER. 1971. Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 68:1246-1248.

MACARTHUR, RH. 1972. Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Harper and Row. New York, USA.

MCPEEK, MA. 1996. Linking local species interactions to rates of speciation in communities. Ecology 77:1355-1366.

MCPEEK, MA. 2004. The growth/predation-risk trade-off: so what is the mechanism? American Naturalist 163:E88-E111.

MCPEEK, MA & JM BROWN. 2000. Building a regional species pool: Diversification of the Enallagma damselflies in eastern North American waters. Ecology 81:904-920.

MCPEEK, MA & R GOMULKIEWICZ. 2005. Assembling and depleting species richness in metacommunities: insights from ecology, population genetics and macroevolution. In: M Holyoak; MA Leibold & RD Holt (eds.). Metacommunity Ecology: Emerging views of community structure and dynamics above the local scale. University of Chicago Press.

MOUQUET, N & M LOREAU. 2002. Coexistence in metacommunities: The regional similarity hypothesis. American Naturalist 159:420-426.

MOUQUET, N & M LOREAU. 2003. Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. American Naturalist 162:544-557.

PETRAITIS, PS. 1989. The representation of niche breadth overlap on Tilman consumer-resource graphs. Oikos 56:289-292.

TILMAN, D. 1982. Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press. Princeton, USA.

TURGEON, J & MA MCPEEK. 2002. Phylogeographic analysis of a recent radiation of Enallagma damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Molecular Ecology 11:1989-2002.

VOLKOV I; JR BANAVAR; SP HUBBELL & A MARITAN. 2003. Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature 424:1035-1037.

WITT, JDS; DW BLINN & PDN HEBERT. 2003. The recent evolutionary origin of the phenotypically novel amphipod Hyalella montezuma offers an ecological explanation for morphological stasis in a closely allied species complex. Molecular Ecology 12:405-413.

WITT, JDS & PDN HEBERT. 2000. Cryptic species diversity and evolution in the amphipod genus Hyalella within central glaciated North America: a molecular phylogenetic approach. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:687-698.

WOOTTON, JT. 2005. Field parameterization and experimental test of the neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature 433:309-312.

Downloads

Published

2005-12-01

How to Cite

Leibold, M. A., & Geddes, P. (2005). The niche concept in metacommunities. Ecología Austral, 15(2), 117–129. Retrieved from https://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1460

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 2 (2005)

Section

Special Section

License

Authors retain their rights as follows: 1) by granting the journal the right to its first publication, and 2) by registering the published article with a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which allows authors and third parties to view and use it as long as they clearly mention its origin (citation or reference, including authorship and first publication in this journal). Authors can make other non-exclusive distribution agreements as long as they clearly indicate their origin and are encouraged to widely share and disseminate the published version of their work.