La investigación científica y la conservación de la biodiversidad en parques nacionales de la Argentina. Dónde estamos y hacia dónde podríamos ir

Laura Borsellino; Emmanuel Zufiaurre; David Bilenca

doi:10.25260/EA.22.32.2.0.1942

Authors

Laura Borsellino Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental. CABA, Argentina. CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA), Grupo de Estudios sobre Biodiversidad en Agroecosistemas (GEBA). CABA, Argentina
Emmanuel Zufiaurre Universidad Nacional de San Antonio de Areco (UNSAdA), Grupo para el Estudio del Manejo y Control Biológico de Plagas Agrícolas. San Antonio de Areco, Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires CITNOBA (UNNOBA-UNSAdA-CONICET). Pergamino, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7078-5905
David Bilenca Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental. CABA, Argentina. CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA), Grupo de Estudios sobre Biodiversidad en Agroecosistemas (GEBA). CABA, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0984-2629

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.2.0.1942

Keywords:

Conservation goals, conservation research, conservation values, management plans, National Parks Administration, protected areas

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) are key to biodiversity conservation, being essential to address their conservation priorities to implement specific management recommendations. In this work we set out: 1) detect to what extent the scientific researches carried out in PAs in Argentina address the conservation priorities for their management, and 2) to investigate the motivations that guide researchers to carry out their studies in these PAs. We checked the overlap between the knowledge needs declared in the management plans of the PAs under the National Parks Administration (APN) with the research permits granted in the National Parks (NPs). In addition, we performed a survey among researchers who had carried out studies in some national park. More than three quarters of the researches carried out in NPs during 2012-2016 were not oriented to answering the research priorities indicated in the respective management plans analyzed, and only half of the conservation goals/values of these PAs were addressed in some study. Moreover, two-thirds of the researchers surveyed carried out their work according to their own lines of research, and only 15% to meet the APN requirements. We observed a mismatch between the scientific knowledge needs for the management of NPs and the researches being carried out there, but we detected a considerable volume of research that could eventually be reoriented, at least partially, and cover gaps in knowledge. Recently, APN joined the Inter-Institutional Council for Science and Technology and convened a scholarship program co-financed with CONICET, which allows to be auspicious with respect to reinforcing the coordination between the scientific community and the management needs of PAs. This work offers a baseline to evaluate the effectiveness of these measures in the medium term.

References

Administración de Parques Nacionales (APN). 2010. Guía para la elaboración de planes de gestión de áreas protegidas. Dirección Nacional de Conservación de Áreas Protegidas, Argentina.

Arlettaz, R., M. Schaub, J. Fournier, T. S. Reichlin, A. Sierro, J. E. Watson, and V. Braunisch. 2010. From publications to public actions: When conservation biologists bridge the gap between research and implementation. BioScience 60:835-842.

Boakes, E. H., N. J. B. Isaac, R. A. Fuller, G. M. Mace, and P. J. K. McGowan. 2018. Examining the

relationship between local extinction risk and position in range. Conservation Biology 32:229-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12979.

Brooks, T. M., M. I. Bakarr, T. Boucher, G. A. B. Da Fonseca, C. Hilton-Taylor, J. M. Hoekstra, T. Moritz, S. Olivieri, J. Parrish, R. L. Pressey, A. S. L. Rodrigues, W. Sechrest, A. Stattersfield, W. Strahm, and S. N. Stuart. 2004. Coverage provided by the global protected-area system: Is it enough? BioScience 54:1081-1091.

Chen, C., J. F. Brodie, R. Kays, T. J. Davies, R. Liu, J. T. Fisher, J. Ahumada, W. McShea, D. Sheil, B. Agwanda, et al. 2022. Global camera trap synthesis highlights the importance of protected areas in maintaining mammal diversity. Conservation Letters e12865. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12865.

Coetzee, B. W. T. 2017. Evaluating the ecological performance of protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 26:231-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1235-2.

Coetzee, B. W. T., K. J. Gaston, and S. L. Chown. 2014. Local scale comparisons of biodiversity as a test for global protected area ecological performance: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9:e105824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105824.

Ehrlich, P. R., and E. O. Wilson. 1991. Biodiversity studies: Science and policy. Science 253:758-762. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.253.5021.758.

Ervin, J., N. Sekhran, A. Dinu. S. Gidda, M. Vergeichik, and J. Mee. 2010. Protected Areas for the 21st Century: Lessons from UNDP/GEF’s Portfolio. New York: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and Montreal: Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).

Flaspolher, D. J., B. R. Bub, and B. A. Kaplin. 2000. Application of conservation biology research to management. Conservation Biology 14:1898-1902. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99443.x.

Geldmann, J., M. Barnes, L. Coad, I. D. Craigie, M. Hockings, and N. D. Burgess. 2013. Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biological Conservation 161:230-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.018.

Gray, C. L., S. L. L. Hill, T. Newbold, L. N. Hudson, L. Boïrger, S. Contu, A. J. Hoskins, S. Ferrier, A. Purvis, and J. P. W. Scharlemann. 2016. Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nature Communications 7:12306. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12306.

Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. En S. Díaz, J. Settele, E. S. Brondízio, H. T. Ngo, M. Guèze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K. A. Brauman, S. H. M. Butchart, K. M. A. Chan, L. A. Garibaldi, K. Ichii, J. Liu, S. M. Subramanian, G. F. Midgley, P. Miloslavich, Z. Molnár, D. Obura, A. Pfaff, S. Polasky, A. Purvis, J. Razzaque, B. Reyers, R. Roy Chowdhury, Y. J. Shin, I. J. Visseren-Hamakers, K. J. Willis and C. N. Zayas (eds.). IPBES Secretariat. Bonn, Germany.

International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. En N. Dudley (ed.). IUCN. Gland, Switzerland.

Jenkins, C. N., and L. Joppa. 2009. Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system. Biological Conservation 142:2166-2174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.04.016.

Laurance, W. F. 2013. Does research help to safeguard protected areas? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28:261-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.017.

Leverington, F., K. L. Costa, J. Courrau, H. Pavese, C. Nolte, M. Marr, L. Coad, N. Burgess, B. Bomhard, and M. Hockings. 2010. Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas - a global study. Second edition. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Lubchenco, J., A. M. Olson, L. B. Brubaker, S. R. Carpenter, M. M. Holland, S. P. Hubbell, S. A. Levin, J. A. MacMahon, P. A. Matson, J. M. Melillo, H. A. Mooney, C. H. Peterson, H. R. Pulliam, L. A. Real, P. J. Regal, and P. G. Risser. 1991. The sustainable biosphere initiative: An ecological research agenda. A report from the Ecological Society of America. Ecology 72:371-412.

Mastrángelo, M. E., N. Pérez-Harguindeguy, L. Enrico, E. Bennett, S. Lavorel, G. S. Cumming, D. Abeygunawardane, L. D. Amarilla, B. Burkhard, B. N. Egoh, L. Frishkoff, L. Galetto, S. Huber,

D. S. Karp, A. Ke, E. Kowaljow, A. Kronenburg-García, B. Locatelli, B. Martín-López, P. Meyfroidt, T. H. Mwampamba, J. Nel, K. A. Nicholas, C. Nicholson, E. Oteros-Rozas, S. J. Rahlao, C. Raudsepp-Hearne, T. Ricketts, U. B. Shrestha, C. Torres, K. J. Winkler, and K. Zoeller. 2019. Key knowledge gaps to achieve global sustainability goals. Nature Sustainability 2:1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0412-1.

Rodríguez, D., L. Álvarez, and J. Dorado. 2020. Acercando la investigación a la gestión en la red de Áreas de Conservación de Mendoza, Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical 27:126-143. https://doi.org/10.31687/saremMN.20.27.1.0.13.

Simonetti, J. A. 2011. Conservation biology in Chile: Are we fulfilling our social contract? Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 84:161-170.

Sutherland, W. J., A. S. Pullin, P. M. Dolman, and T. M. Knight. 2004. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:305-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018.

Sutherland, W. J., and R. P. Freckleton. 2012. Making predictive ecology more relevant to policy makers and practitioners. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 367:322-330. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0181.

Sunderland, T., J. Sunderland-Groves, P. Shanley, and B. Campbell. 2009. Bridging the Gap: How Can Information Access and Exchange Between Conservation Biologists and Field Practitioners be Improved for Better Conservation Outcomes? Biotropica 41:549-554.

UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. 2021. Protected Planet Report 2020. En H. C. Bingham, E. Lewis, J. Tayleur, C. Cunningham, N. Kingston, N. D. Burgess, N. Ash, T. Sandwith and K. MacKinnon (eds.). UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. Cambridge UK. Gland, Switzerland.