Observations, challenges and opportunities in feedlot effluents management in Buenos Aires Province, Argentina

Authors

  • Ana R. García Cátedra de Química Analítica, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
  • Santiago N. Fleite Cátedra de Química Analítica, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
  • Ileana Ciapparelli Cátedra de Química Analítica, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
  • Daniela Vázquez Pugliese Cátedra de Química Analítica, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
  • Cristian Weigandt Cátedra de Química Analítica, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
  • Alicia Fabrizio De Iorio Cátedra de Química Analítica, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.16.25.3.0.238

Abstract

The accumulation of beef cattle manure on feedlot pen surfaces generates large effluent volumes which can impact surface and groundwater quality. The aim of this study is to examine and summarize the available information on feedlot effluents management in Buenos Aires Province, highlighting the environmental effects and the weaknesses and future actions suitable to be implemented. We describe the environmental effects of this activity over waterbodies quality and analyze the existing regulations, with special emphasis on criteria and/or discharge levels proposed by legislation. This study reveals some gaps and incongruence as well as needs and opportunities for adjustment and expanding of existing regulations. Finally, an operating scheme used to frame the analysis of different aspects involved in feedlot effluent management is proposed. Such scheme identifies four components defined considering the development of a Nutrient Management Plan (NMP) and the determination of an Effluent Control Criterion (ECC).

References

ANDRIULO, A; C SASAL; C AMÉNDOLA & F RIMATORI. 2003. Impacto de un sistema intensivo de producción de carne vacuna sobre algunas propiedades del suelo y del agua. INTA, Argentina. Ria, 32(3):27-56.

ARNOLD, ST & EA MEISTER. 1999. Dairy feedlot contributions to ground water contamination: a preliminary study in New Mexico. J. Environ. Health, 62(2):16-19.

CAIRNS, JJ. 1999. Assimilative capacity - the key to sustainable use of the planet. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery, 6:259-263.

CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment). 1999. Canadian environmental quality guidelines, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg. [Doc. en línea] en: http://www.ccme.ca/en/resources/canadian_environmental_quality_guidelines/ index.html. [Consultado: abril de 2015].

CHAPRA, SC. 1997. Surface Water-Quality Modeling. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 844.

CIAPPARELLI, I & AR GARCÍA. 2015. Use of Manure to Wheat Production in an Argentinean Hapludoll soil. J. Pollut. Eff. Cont., 3(1):131.

GARCÍA, AR; SN FLEITE; D VÁZQUEZ PUGLIESE & AF DE IORIO. 2013. Feedlots and pollution—A growing threat to water resources of agro-production zone in Argentina. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(21):11932-11933.

GARCÍA, AR & AF DE IORIO. 2003. Phosphorus distribution in sediments of Morales Stream (tributary of the Matanza-Riachuelo River, Argentina). The influence of organic point source contamination. Hydrobiología, 492:129-138.

GARCÍA, AR; R MAISONNAVE; M MASSOBRIO & AF DE IORIO. 2012. Field-scale evaluation of water fluxes and manure solution leaching in feedlot pen soils. J. Environ. Qual., 41:1591-1599.

GILBERTSON, CB; RN CLARK & NP SWANSON. 1980. Runoff control for livestock feedlots. A state of the art. Agricultural information bulletin 441, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC. Pp. 19.

GILLEY, JE; ED BERRY; RA EIGENBERG; DB MARX & BLW OODBURY. 2008. Spatial variations in nutrient and microbial transport from feedlot surfaces. Trans ASABE, 51(2):675-684.

HERRERO, MA & S GIL. 2008. Consideraciones ambientales de la intensificación en producción animal. Ecol. Austral, 18(3):273-289.

MAISONNAVE, R. 2002. Consecuencias ambientales de la producción de carne en sistemas intensivos. Tesis para optar al título de Master en Ciencias Ambientales. Biblioteca de la Facultad De Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. UBA. Argentina.

MAULE, CP & TA FONSTAD. 2002. Solute migration and moisture flux beneath cattle feedlot pens. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 45:73-81.

MAZZONE, J; P DILLION & P PAVELIC. 1992. A review of the impact of feedlots on groundwater quality. Center For Groundwater Studies. Report no 43. Pp. 25.

MILLER, JJ; B B EASLEY & CS O LSON. 2006. Bedding and within-pen location effects on feedlot pen runoff quality using a rainfall simulator. J. Environ. Qual., 35(2):505-515.

MILLER, JJ; BP HANDEREK; BW BEASLEY; ECS OLSON; LJ YANKE; ET AL. 2004. Quantity and quality of runoff from a beef cattle feedlot in Southern Alberta. J. Environ Qual, 33(3):1088-1097.

ROBERT, S & F SANTANGELO. 2009. Estructura del feedlot en Argentina - Nivel de asociación entre la producción bovina a corral y los titulares de faena. IPCVA-CEPAL.

SENASA (Servicio Nac. de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria). 2008. Indicadores Ganadería Bovina. Información del Sistema Integrado de Gestión para la Sanidad Animal. [Doc. en línea] en: http://www.senasa.gov.ar/indicadores.php?d=1_indicadores_Ganaderia_Bovina&in=1 [Consultado: abril de 2015].

SENASA (Servicio Nac.de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria). 2013. Indicadores Ganadería Bovina. Información del Sistema Integrado de Gestión para la Sanidad Animal. [Doc. en línea] en: http://www.senasa.gov.ar/indicadores.php?d=1_Indicadores_Ganaderia_Bovina&in=1 [Consultado: abril de 2015].

SHOUSE, S. 2012. Small open beef feedlots in Iowa, a producer guide. Iowa State University. [Doc. en línea] en: http://www.agronext.iastate.edu/immag/info/ PM3018 openbeeffeedlots. pdf [Consultado: abril de 2015].

SWEETEN, JM. 1998. Cattle feedlot manure and waste management practices. Pp. 125-156 en: Hatfield, JL & BA Stewart (eds.). Animal waste utilization: effective use of manure as a soil resource. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI.

USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1997. Technical Guidance Manual for Performing Wasteload Allocations, Book II: Streams and Rivers Part 1: Biochemical Oxygen Demand/Dissolved Oxygen and Nutrients/Eutrophication. Washington DC. EPA 823-B-97-0020. Pp. 258.

USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1999. Draft Guidance for water Quality-based Decisions: The TMDL Process (Second Edition). Washington DC. EPA 841-D-99-001. Pp. 107.

USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2001. Development document for the proposed revisions to the national pollutant discharge elimination system regulation and the effluent guidelines for concentrated animal feeding operations. Washington DC. EPA 821-R-01-003. Pp. 767.

VÁZQUEZ PUGLIESE, DE. 2013. Cantidad y calidad química de las escorrentías en un sistema de engorde a corral (feedlot). Trabajo de Intensificación para optar al título de Ingeniera Agrónoma. Director: García, AR. Biblioteca de la Facultad de Agronomía. UBA. Argentina.

Feedlot

Published

2015-12-31

How to Cite

García, A. R., Fleite, S. N., Ciapparelli, I., Vázquez Pugliese, D., Weigandt, C., & Fabrizio De Iorio, A. (2015). Observations, challenges and opportunities in feedlot effluents management in Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Ecología Austral, 25(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.16.25.3.0.238